Literature DB >> 22491980

Floquet stability analysis of the longitudinal dynamics of two hovering model insects.

Jiang Hao Wu1, Mao Sun.   

Abstract

Because of the periodically varying aerodynamic and inertial forces of the flapping wings, a hovering or constant-speed flying insect is a cyclically forcing system, and, generally, the flight is not in a fixed-point equilibrium, but in a cyclic-motion equilibrium. Current stability theory of insect flight is based on the averaged model and treats the flight as a fixed-point equilibrium. In the present study, we treated the flight as a cyclic-motion equilibrium and used the Floquet theory to analyse the longitudinal stability of insect flight. Two hovering model insects were considered-a dronefly and a hawkmoth. The former had relatively high wingbeat frequency and small wing-mass to body-mass ratio, and hence very small amplitude of body oscillation; while the latter had relatively low wingbeat frequency and large wing-mass to body-mass ratio, and hence relatively large amplitude of body oscillation. For comparison, analysis using the averaged-model theory (fixed-point stability analysis) was also made. Results of both the cyclic-motion stability analysis and the fixed-point stability analysis were tested by numerical simulation using complete equations of motion coupled with the Navier-Stokes equations. The Floquet theory (cyclic-motion stability analysis) agreed well with the simulation for both the model dronefly and the model hawkmoth; but the averaged-model theory gave good results only for the dronefly. Thus, for an insect with relatively large body oscillation at wingbeat frequency, cyclic-motion stability analysis is required, and for their control analysis, the existing well-developed control theories for systems of fixed-point equilibrium are no longer applicable and new methods that take the cyclic variation of the flight dynamics into account are needed.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22491980      PMCID: PMC3405748          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  12 in total

1.  Effects of wing deformation on aerodynamic forces in hovering hoverflies.

Authors:  Gang Du; Mao Sun
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Flight control in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: the inverse problem of hovering.

Authors:  T L Hedrick; T L Daniel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Hovering of model insects: simulation by coupling equations of motion with Navier-Stokes equations.

Authors:  Jiang Hao Wu; Yan Lai Zhang; Mao Sun
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Nonlinear time-periodic models of the longitudinal flight dynamics of desert locusts Schistocerca gregaria.

Authors:  Graham K Taylor; Rafał Zbikowski
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation.

Authors:  A P Willmott; C P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight.

Authors:  A P Willmott; C P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Dynamic flight stability in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria.

Authors:  Graham K Taylor; Adrian L R Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Into thin air: Contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta.

Authors:  S A Combes; T L Daniel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of hovering droneflies.

Authors:  Yanpeng Liu; Mao Sun
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion.

Authors:  Mao Sun; Jian Tang
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  9 in total

1.  Nonlinear flight dynamics and stability of hovering model insects.

Authors:  Bin Liang; Mao Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Dynamics and flight control of a flapping-wing robotic insect in the presence of wind gusts.

Authors:  Pakpong Chirarattananon; Yufeng Chen; E Farrell Helbling; Kevin Y Ma; Richard Cheng; Robert J Wood
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Chordwise wing flexibility may passively stabilize hovering insects.

Authors:  James E Bluman; Madhu K Sridhar; Chang-Kwon Kang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Predicting fruit fly's sensing rate with insect flight simulations.

Authors:  Song Chang; Z Jane Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The roles of vision and antennal mechanoreception in hawkmoth flight control.

Authors:  Ajinkya Dahake; Anna L Stöckl; James J Foster; Sanjay P Sane; Almut Kelber
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Vision-based flight control in the hawkmoth Hyles lineata.

Authors:  Shane P Windsor; Richard J Bomphrey; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Forward flight of birds revisited. Part 2: short-term dynamic stability and trim.

Authors:  G Iosilevskii
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  A semi-empirical model of the aerodynamics of manoeuvring insect flight.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Dual dimensionality reduction reveals independent encoding of motor features in a muscle synergy for insect flight control.

Authors:  Simon Sponberg; Thomas L Daniel; Adrienne L Fairhall
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.