Literature DB >> 19446433

Profiling the activity of environmental chemicals in prenatal developmental toxicity studies using the U.S. EPA's ToxRefDB.

Thomas B Knudsen1, Matthew T Martin, Robert J Kavlock, Richard S Judson, David J Dix, Amar V Singh.   

Abstract

As the primary source for regulatory developmental toxicity information, prenatal studies characterize maternal effects and fetal endpoints including malformations, resorptions, and fetal weight reduction. Results from 383 rat and 368 rabbit prenatal studies on 387 chemicals, mostly pesticides, were entered into the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Toxicity Reference Database (ToxRefDB) using harmonized terminology. An initial assessment of these data was performed with the goal of profiling environmental chemicals based on maternal and fetal endpoints for anchoring in vitro data provided in the EPA's ToxCast research program. Using 30 years worth of standard prenatal studies, maternal and fetal effects were culled from the database and analyzed by target-description fields and lowest effect levels (LELs). Focusing on inter-species comparison, the complexity of fetal target organ response to maternal dosing with environmental chemicals during the period of major organogenesis revealed hierarchical relationships. Of 283 chemicals tested in both species, 53 chemicals (18.7%) had LELs on development (dLEL) that were either specific, with no maternal toxicity (mLEL), or sensitive (dLEL<mLEL) to exposure in one species or another. The primary expressions of developmental toxicity in pregnant rats were fetal weight reduction, skeletal variations and abnormalities, and fetal urogenital defects. General pregnancy/fetal losses were over-represented in the rabbit as were structural malformations to the visceral body wall and CNS. Based upon administered doses, there was a clear hierarchy to the sensitivity and specificity of dLELs in comparing species, with rat development being more sensitive with regards to the number of endpoints affected and the number of active chemicals. Many of these relationships are consistent with previous database studies of developmental toxicology, indicating that they are driven by the biology of the test species. This novel data model provides an important public resource for cross-scale modeling and predictive understanding of developmental processes and toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19446433     DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Toxicol        ISSN: 0890-6238            Impact factor:   3.143


  31 in total

Review 1.  Developing novel in vitro methods for the risk assessment of developmental and placental toxicants in the environment.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fry; Jacqueline Bangma; John Szilagyi; Julia E Rager
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  In silico prediction of the developmental toxicity of diverse organic chemicals in rodents for regulatory purposes.

Authors:  Nikita Basant; Shikha Gupta; Kunwar P Singh
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  The Next Generation Blueprint of Computational Toxicology at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Authors:  Russell S Thomas; Tina Bahadori; Timothy J Buckley; John Cowden; Chad Deisenroth; Kathie L Dionisio; Jeffrey B Frithsen; Christopher M Grulke; Maureen R Gwinn; Joshua A Harrill; Mark Higuchi; Keith A Houck; Michael F Hughes; E Sidney Hunter; Kristin K Isaacs; Richard S Judson; Thomas B Knudsen; Jason C Lambert; Monica Linnenbrink; Todd M Martin; Seth R Newton; Stephanie Padilla; Grace Patlewicz; Katie Paul-Friedman; Katherine A Phillips; Ann M Richard; Reeder Sams; Timothy J Shafer; R Woodrow Setzer; Imran Shah; Jane E Simmons; Steven O Simmons; Amar Singh; Jon R Sobus; Mark Strynar; Adam Swank; Rogelio Tornero-Valez; Elin M Ulrich; Daniel L Villeneuve; John F Wambaugh; Barbara A Wetmore; Antony J Williams
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Suspect Screening Analysis of Chemicals in Consumer Products.

Authors:  Katherine A Phillips; Alice Yau; Kristin A Favela; Kristin K Isaacs; Andrew McEachran; Christopher Grulke; Ann M Richard; Antony J Williams; Jon R Sobus; Russell S Thomas; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Retrospective mining of toxicology data to discover multispecies and chemical class effects: Anemia as a case study.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Matthew T Martin; Grace Patlewicz; Charles E Wood
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Systems Modeling of Developmental Vascular Toxicity.

Authors:  Katerine S Saili; Jill A Franzosa; Nancy C Baker; Robert G Ellis-Hutchings; Raja S Settivari; Edward W Carney; Richard Spencer; Todd J Zurlinden; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Shuaizhang Li; Menghang Xia; Thomas B Knudsen
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2019-06-01

7.  ToxRefDB version 2.0: Improved utility for predictive and retrospective toxicology analyses.

Authors:  Sean Watford; Ly Ly Pham; Jessica Wignall; Robert Shin; Matthew T Martin; Katie Paul Friedman
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2019-07-21       Impact factor: 3.143

8.  A novel framework for predicting in vivo toxicities from in vitro data using optimal methods for dense and sparse matrix reordering and logistic regression.

Authors:  Peter A DiMaggio; Ashwin Subramani; Richard S Judson; Christodoulos A Floudas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Genetic toxicology in the 21st century: reflections and future directions.

Authors:  Brinda Mahadevan; Ronald D Snyder; Michael D Waters; R Daniel Benz; Raymond A Kemper; Raymond R Tice; Ann M Richard
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  In vitro screening of environmental chemicals for targeted testing prioritization: the ToxCast project.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Robert J Kavlock; Thomas B Knudsen; Matthew T Martin; Holly M Mortensen; David M Reif; Daniel M Rotroff; Imran Shah; Ann M Richard; David J Dix
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.