Literature DB >> 20702588

A novel framework for predicting in vivo toxicities from in vitro data using optimal methods for dense and sparse matrix reordering and logistic regression.

Peter A DiMaggio1, Ashwin Subramani, Richard S Judson, Christodoulos A Floudas.   

Abstract

In this work, we combine the strengths of mixed-integer linear optimization (MILP) and logistic regression for predicting the in vivo toxicity of chemicals using only their measured in vitro assay data. The proposed approach utilizes a biclustering method based on iterative optimal reordering (DiMaggio, P. A., McAllister, S. R., Floudas, C. A., Feng, X. J., Rabinowitz, J. D., and Rabitz, H. A. (2008). Biclustering via optimal re-ordering of data matrices in systems biology: rigorous methods and comparative studies. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 458-474.; DiMaggio, P. A., McAllister, S. R., Floudas, C. A., Feng, X. J., Rabinowitz, J. D., and Rabitz, H. A. (2010b). A network flow model for biclustering via optimal re-ordering of data matrices. J. Global. Optim. 47, 343-354.) to identify biclusters corresponding to subsets of chemicals that have similar responses over distinct subsets of the in vitro assays. The biclustering of the in vitro assays is shown to result in significant clustering based on assay target (e.g., cytochrome P450 [CYP] and nuclear receptors) and type (e.g., downregulated BioMAP and biochemical high-throughput screening protein kinase activity assays). An optimal method based on mixed-integer linear optimization for reordering sparse data matrices (DiMaggio, P. A., McAllister, S. R., Floudas, C. A., Feng, X. J., Li, G. Y., Rabinowitz, J. D., and Rabitz, H. A. (2010a). Enhancing molecular discovery using descriptor-free rearrangement clustering techniques for sparse data sets. AIChE J. 56, 405-418.; McAllister, S. R., DiMaggio, P. A., and Floudas, C. A. (2009). Mathematical modeling and efficient optimization methods for the distance-dependent rearrangement clustering problem. J. Global. Optim. 45, 111-129) is then applied to the in vivo data set (21.7% sparse) in order to cluster end points that have similar lowest effect level (LEL) values, where it is observed that the end points are effectively clustered according to (1) animal species (i.e., the chronic mouse and chronic rat end points were clearly separated) and (2) similar physiological attributes (i.e., liver- and reproductive-related end points were found to separately cluster together). As the liver and reproductive end points exhibited the largest degree of correlation, we further analyzed them using regularized logistic regression in a rank-and-drop framework to identify which subset of in vitro features could be utilized for in vivo toxicity prediction. It was observed that the in vivo end points that had similar LEL responses over the 309 chemicals (as determined by the sparse clustering results) also shared a significant subset of selected in vitro descriptors. Comparing the significant descriptors between the two different categories of end points revealed a specificity of the CYP assays for the liver end points and preferential selection of the estrogen/androgen nuclear receptors by the reproductive end points.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20702588      PMCID: PMC2955210          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  20 in total

1.  Characterization of compound mechanisms and secondary activities by BioMAP analysis.

Authors:  Ellen L Berg; Eric J Kunkel; Evangelos Hytopoulos; Ivan Plavec
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  David J Dix; Keith A Houck; Matthew T Martin; Ann M Richard; R Woodrow Setzer; Robert J Kavlock
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Biclustering models for structured microarray data.

Authors:  Heather L Turner; Trevor C Bailey; Wojtek J Krzanowski; Cheryl A Hemingway
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  Regulation of cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes by nuclear receptors.

Authors:  P Honkakoski; M Negishi
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 5.  In vitro and in vivo drug interactions involving human CYP3A.

Authors:  K E Thummel; G R Wilkinson
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 6.  Xenobiotic-inducible transcription of cytochrome P450 genes.

Authors:  M S Denison; J P Whitlock
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-08-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Hepatocarcinogenic potential of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in rodents and its implications on human risk.

Authors:  W W Huber; B Grasl-Kraupp; R Schulte-Hermann
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.635

8.  Evaluation of normalization and pre-clustering issues in a novel clustering approach: global optimum search with enhanced positioning.

Authors:  Meng P Tan; James R Broach; Christodoulos A Floudas
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.122

9.  Screening for estrogen and androgen receptor activities in 200 pesticides by in vitro reporter gene assays using Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kojima; Eiji Katsura; Shinji Takeuchi; Kazuhito Niiyama; Kunihiko Kobayashi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  A comparison of machine learning algorithms for chemical toxicity classification using a simulated multi-scale data model.

Authors:  Richard Judson; Fathi Elloumi; R Woodrow Setzer; Zhen Li; Imran Shah
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

1.  Relating Essential Proteins to Drug Side-Effects Using Canonical Component Analysis: A Structure-Based Approach.

Authors:  Tianyun Liu; Russ B Altman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 2.  Paradigm shift in toxicity testing and modeling.

Authors:  Hongmao Sun; Menghang Xia; Christopher P Austin; Ruili Huang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Structure prediction of loops with fixed and flexible stems.

Authors:  A Subramani; C A Floudas
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  ASTRO-FOLD 2.0: an Enhanced Framework for Protein Structure Prediction.

Authors:  A Subramani; Y Wei; C A Floudas
Journal:  AIChE J       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.993

5.  β-sheet topology prediction with high precision and recall for β and mixed α/β proteins.

Authors:  Ashwin Subramani; Christodoulos A Floudas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Breakthroughs in modern cancer therapy and elusive cardiotoxicity: Critical research-practice gaps, challenges, and insights.

Authors:  Ping-Pin Zheng; Jin Li; Johan M Kros
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 12.944

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.