Literature DB >> 21538556

Genetic toxicology in the 21st century: reflections and future directions.

Brinda Mahadevan1, Ronald D Snyder, Michael D Waters, R Daniel Benz, Raymond A Kemper, Raymond R Tice, Ann M Richard.   

Abstract

A symposium at the 40th anniversary of the Environmental Mutagen Society, held from October 24-28, 2009 in St. Louis, MO, surveyed the current status and future directions of genetic toxicology. This article summarizes the presentations and provides a perspective on the future. An abbreviated history is presented, highlighting the current standard battery of genotoxicity assays and persistent challenges. Application of computational toxicology to safety testing within a regulatory setting is discussed as a means for reducing the need for animal testing and human clinical trials, and current approaches and applications of in silico genotoxicity screening approaches across the pharmaceutical industry were surveyed and are reported here. The expanded use of toxicogenomics to illuminate mechanisms and bridge genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, and new public efforts to use high-throughput screening technologies to address lack of toxicity evaluation for the backlog of thousands of industrial chemicals in the environment are detailed. The Tox21 project involves coordinated efforts of four U.S. Government regulatory/research entities to use new and innovative assays to characterize key steps in toxicity pathways, including genotoxic and nongenotoxic mechanisms for carcinogenesis. Progress to date, highlighting preliminary test results from the National Toxicology Program is summarized. Finally, an overview is presented of ToxCast™, a related research program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, using a broad array of high throughput and high content technologies for toxicity profiling of environmental chemicals, and computational toxicology modeling. Progress and challenges, including the pressing need to incorporate metabolic activation capability, are summarized.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21538556      PMCID: PMC3160238          DOI: 10.1002/em.20653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  73 in total

1.  Use of toxicological information in drug design.

Authors:  E J Matthews; R D Benz; J F Contrera
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.518

2.  Derivation and validation of toxicophores for mutagenicity prediction.

Authors:  Jeroen Kazius; Ross McGuire; Roberta Bursi
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.

Authors:  David Kirkland; Marilyn Aardema; Lutz Müller; Hayashi Makoto
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 4.  Assessment of atypical DNA intercalating agents in biological and in silico systems.

Authors:  Ronald D Snyder
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; George M Gray; John R Bucher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  In Silico Screening of Chemicals for Genetic Toxicity Using MDL-QSAR, Nonparametric Discriminant Analysis, E-State, Connectivity, and Molecular Property Descriptors.

Authors:  Joseph F Contrera; Edwin J Matthews; Naomi L Kruhlak; R Daniel Benz
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.987

7.  Predictive toxicogenomics approaches reveal underlying molecular mechanisms of nongenotoxic carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Alex Y Nie; Michael McMillian; J Brandon Parker; Angelique Leone; Stewart Bryant; Lynn Yieh; Anton Bittner; Jay Nelson; Andrew Carmen; Jackson Wan; Peter G Lord
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.784

8.  Predicting the hepatocarcinogenic potential of alkenylbenzene flavoring agents using toxicogenomics and machine learning.

Authors:  Scott S Auerbach; Ruchir R Shah; Deepak Mav; Cynthia S Smith; Nigel J Walker; Molly K Vallant; Gary A Boorman; Richard D Irwin
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  Profiling chemicals based on chronic toxicity results from the U.S. EPA ToxRef Database.

Authors:  Matthew T Martin; Richard S Judson; David M Reif; Robert J Kavlock; David J Dix
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The carcinogenesis bioassay in perspective: application in identifying human cancer hazards.

Authors:  V A Fung; J C Barrett; J Huff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  25 in total

1.  Criteria for environmentally associated autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Frederick W Miller; K Michael Pollard; Christine G Parks; Dori R Germolec; Patrick S C Leung; Carlo Selmi; Michael C Humble; Noel R Rose
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 7.094

Review 2.  A high-fidelity method for genomic sequencing of single somatic cells reveals a very high mutational burden.

Authors:  Jan Vijg; Xiao Dong; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2017-07

Review 3.  Functional genomic screening approaches in mechanistic toxicology and potential future applications of CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Hua Shen; Cliona M McHale; Martyn T Smith; Luoping Zhang
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 5.657

Review 4.  The Impact of Novel Assessment Methodologies in Toxicology on Green Chemistry and Chemical Alternatives.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Nigel Greene
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Genetic toxicology in silico protocol.

Authors:  Catrin Hasselgren; Ernst Ahlberg; Yumi Akahori; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Franck Atienzar; Scott Auerbach; Lisa Beilke; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Ewan D Booth; Dave Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Zoryana Cammerer; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Laura Custer; Krista Dobo; Tatyana Doktorova; David Faulkner; Kevin A Ford; Marie C Fortin; Markus Frericks; Samantha E Gad-McDonald; Nichola Gellatly; Helga Gerets; Véronique Gervais; Susanne Glowienke; Jacky Van Gompel; James S Harvey; Jedd Hillegass; Masamitsu Honma; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Chia-Wen Hsu; Tara S Barton-Maclaren; Candice Johnson; Robert Jolly; David Jones; Ray Kemper; Michelle O Kenyon; Naomi L Kruhlak; Sunil A Kulkarni; Klaus Kümmerer; Penny Leavitt; Scott Masten; Scott Miller; Chandrika Moudgal; Wolfgang Muster; Alexandre Paulino; Elena Lo Piparo; Mark Powley; Donald P Quigley; M Vijayaray Reddy; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Benoit Schilter; Ronald D Snyder; Lidiya Stavitskaya; Reinhard Stidl; David T Szabo; Andrew Teasdale; Raymond R Tice; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Anna Vuorinen; Brian A Wall; Pete Watts; Angela T White; Joerg Wichard; Kristine L Witt; Adam Woolley; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Incorporation of metabolic activation potentiates cyclophosphamide-induced DNA damage response in isogenic DT40 mutant cells.

Authors:  Kiyohiro Hashimoto; Shunichi Takeda; James A Swenberg; Jun Nakamura
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  GFP-fused yeast cells as whole-cell biosensors for genotoxicity evaluation of nitrosamines.

Authors:  Ying He; Haotian Ding; Xingya Xia; Wenyi Qi; Huaisong Wang; Wenyuan Liu; Feng Zheng
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Biological clues to potent DNA-damaging activities in food and flavoring.

Authors:  M Zulfiquer Hossain; Samuel F Gilbert; Kalpesh Patel; Soma Ghosh; Anil K Bhunia; Scott E Kern
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 6.023

9.  Non-monotonic dose responses in studies of endocrine disrupting chemicals: bisphenol a as a case study.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Development of a Medium-term Animal Model Using gpt Delta Rats to Evaluate Chemical Carcinogenicity and Genotoxicity.

Authors:  Kohei Matsushita; Aki Kijima; Yuji Ishii; Shinji Takasu; Meilan Jin; Ken Kuroda; Hiroaki Kawaguchi; Noriaki Miyoshi; Takehiko Nohmi; Kumiko Ogawa; Takashi Umemura
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 1.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.