Literature DB >> 30090388

In silico prediction of the developmental toxicity of diverse organic chemicals in rodents for regulatory purposes.

Nikita Basant1, Shikha Gupta2, Kunwar P Singh2.   

Abstract

The experimental determination of the developmental toxicity potential (LEL) of chemicals is not only tedious, time and resource intensive, but it also involves unethical tests on animals. In this study, we have established quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models for predicting the developmental toxicity potential of chemicals in rodents following the OECD guidelines. Accordingly, decision tree forest (DTF) and decision tree boost (DTB) based local (L-QSAR), global (G-QSAR) and interspecies quantitative structure activity-activity relationship (ISC QSAAR) models were developed for estimating the LEL (lowest effective level) dose of chemicals for developmental toxicity in rats and rabbits. The structural features of chemicals responsible for developmental toxicity in rodents were extracted and used in QSAR/QSAAR analysis. The external predictive power of the developed models was evaluated through the internal and external validation procedures. In test data, the L-QSAR models (DTF, DTB) yielded R2 values of >0.846 (rat) and >0.906 (rabbit), whereas in G-QSAR, the correlation value was >0.870 between the measured and predicted endpoint values. In ISC QSAAR models, the R2 values in test data were 0.830 (DTF) and 0.927 (DTB), respectively. Values of various statistical validation coefficients derived from the test data (except rm2 in DTF based rat L-QSAR and ISC QSAAR models) were above their respective threshold limits, thus putting a high confidence in this analysis. The prediction quality of the developed QSAR/QSAAR models was also assessed using the mean absolute error (MAE) criteria and found good. The applicability domains of the constructed models were defined using the descriptor range, leverage, and standardization approaches. The results suggest that the developed QSAR/QSAAR models can reliably predict the developmental toxicity potential of structurally diverse chemicals in rodents, generating useful toxicity data for risk assessment in humans.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 30090388      PMCID: PMC6061034          DOI: 10.1039/c5tx00493d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)        ISSN: 2045-452X            Impact factor:   3.524


  30 in total

1.  Development of binary classification of structural chromosome aberrations for a diverse set of organic compounds from molecular structure.

Authors:  J R Serra; E D Thompson; P C Jurs
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 52.

Authors:  Tatiana I Netzeva; Andrew Worth; Tom Aldenberg; Romualdo Benigni; Mark T D Cronin; Paolo Gramatica; Joanna S Jaworska; Scott Kahn; Gilles Klopman; Carol A Marchant; Glenn Myatt; Nina Nikolova-Jeliazkova; Grace Y Patlewicz; Roger Perkins; David Roberts; Terry Schultz; David W Stanton; Johannes J M van de Sandt; Weida Tong; Gilman Veith; Chihae Yang
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.303

3.  Genomics and developmental risk assessment.

Authors:  George P Daston
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2007-01

4.  Toxicology for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Thomas Hartung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  PaDEL-descriptor: an open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints.

Authors:  Chun Wei Yap
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens.

Authors:  L M Shi; H Fang; W Tong; J Wu; R Perkins; R M Blair; W S Branham; S L Dial; C L Moland; D M Sheehan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

7.  Transfer across the perfused human placenta of antipyrine, sodium and leucine.

Authors:  H Schneider; M Panigel; J Dancis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1972-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Predicting aquatic toxicities of chemical pesticides in multiple test species using nonlinear QSTR modeling approaches.

Authors:  Nikita Basant; Shikha Gupta; Kunwar P Singh
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Carbamazepine and its metabolites in human perfused placenta and in maternal and cord blood.

Authors:  P Pienimäki; A L Hartikainen; P Arvela; T Partanen; R Herva; O Pelkonen; K Vähäkangas
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Profiling chemicals based on chronic toxicity results from the U.S. EPA ToxRef Database.

Authors:  Matthew T Martin; Richard S Judson; David M Reif; Robert J Kavlock; David J Dix
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR) Model for Predicting Teratogenic Risk of Antiseizure Medications in Pregnancy by Using Support Vector Machine.

Authors:  Liyuan Kang; Yifei Duan; Cheng Chen; Shihai Li; Menglong Li; Lei Chen; Zhining Wen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Predicting Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Based On the Combination of Chemical Structures and Biological Data.

Authors:  Heather L Ciallella; Daniel P Russo; Swati Sharma; Yafan Li; Eddie Sloter; Len Sweet; Heng Huang; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 11.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.