Literature DB >> 31233757

Developing novel in vitro methods for the risk assessment of developmental and placental toxicants in the environment.

Rebecca C Fry1, Jacqueline Bangma2, John Szilagyi2, Julia E Rager3.   

Abstract

During pregnancy, the placenta is critical for the regulation of maternal homeostasis and fetal growth and development. Exposures to environmental chemicals during pregnancy can be detrimental to the health of the placenta and therefore adversely impact maternal and fetal health. Though research on placental-derived developmental toxicity is expanding, testing is limited by the resources required for traditional test methods based on whole animal experimentation. Alternative strategies utilizing in vitro methods are well suited to contribute to more efficient screening of chemical toxicity and identification of biological mechanisms underlying toxicity outcomes. This review aims to summarize methods that can be used to evaluate toxicity resulting from exposures during the prenatal period, with a focus on newer in vitro methods centered on placental toxicity. The following key aspects are reviewed: (i) traditional test methods based on animal developmental toxicity testing, (ii) in vitro methods using monocultures and explant models, as well as more recently developed methods, including co-cultures, placenta-on-a-chip, and 3-dimensional (3D) cell models, (iii) endpoints that are commonly measured using in vitro designs, and (iv) the translation of in vitro methods into chemical evaluations and risk assessment applications. We conclude that findings from in vitro placental models can contribute to the screening of potentially hazardous chemicals, elucidation of chemical mechanism of action, incorporation into adverse outcome pathways, estimation of doses eliciting toxicity, derivation of extrapolation factors, and characterization of overall risk of adverse outcomes, representing key components of chemical regulation in the 21st century.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative methods; Developmental toxicity; Environmental chemicals; In vitro; Placenta; Pregnancy; Prenatal exposure; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31233757      PMCID: PMC6684208          DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2019.114635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  114 in total

1.  Tissue engineering human placenta trophoblast cells in 3-D fibrous matrix: spatial effects on cell proliferation and function.

Authors:  T Ma; Y Li; S T Yang; D A Kniss
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

2.  Cell culture models of trophoblast II: trophoblast cell lines--a workshop report.

Authors:  A King; L Thomas; P Bischof
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  A pediatric perspective on the unique vulnerability and resilience of the embryo and the child to environmental toxicants: the importance of rigorous research concerning age and agent.

Authors:  Robert L Brent; Susanne Tanski; Michael Weitzman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Recent developments in regulatory requirements for developmental toxicology.

Authors:  C A Kimmel; S L Makris
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2001-03-31       Impact factor: 4.372

5.  Screening of selected pesticides for inhibition of CYP19 aromatase activity in vitro.

Authors:  A M Vinggaard; C Hnida; V Breinholt; J C Larsen
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Cytogenetic and DNA-fingerprint characterization of choriocarcinoma cell lines and a trophoblast/choriocarcinoma cell hybrid.

Authors:  H G Frank; B Gunawan; I Ebeling-Stark; H J Schulten; H Funayama; U Cremer; B Huppertz; G Gaus; P Kaufmann; L Füzesi
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2000-01-01

7.  Effects of cadmium cell viability, trophoblastic development, and expression of low density lipoprotein receptor transcripts in cultured human placental cells.

Authors:  L S Jolibois; M E Burow; K F Swan; W J George; M B Anderson; M C Henson
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 8.  Efflux transporters of the human placenta.

Authors:  Amber M Young; Courtni E Allen; Kenneth L Audus
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 9.  A comparison of placental development and endocrine functions between the human and mouse model.

Authors:  A Malassiné; J L Frendo; D Evain-Brion
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 10.  Cancer and developmental exposure to endocrine disruptors.

Authors:  Linda S Birnbaum; Suzanne E Fenton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  15 in total

1.  Placenta as a target of trichloroethylene toxicity.

Authors:  Elana R Elkin; Sean M Harris; Anthony L Su; Lawrence H Lash; Rita Loch-Caruso
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.238

2.  Microfluidic systems for modeling human development.

Authors:  Makenzie G Bonner; Hemanth Gudapati; Xingrui Mou; Samira Musah
Journal:  Development       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Integrative exposomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic analyses of human placental samples links understudied chemicals to preeclampsia.

Authors:  Alex Chao; Jarod Grossman; Celeste Carberry; Yunjia Lai; Antony J Williams; Jeffrey M Minucci; S Thomas Purucker; John Szilagyi; Kun Lu; Kim Boggess; Rebecca C Fry; Jon R Sobus; Julia E Rager
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 13.352

Review 4.  Using liver models generated from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) for evaluating chemical-induced modifications and disease across liver developmental stages.

Authors:  Celeste K Carberry; Stephen S Ferguson; Adriana S Beltran; Rebecca C Fry; Julia E Rager
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 5.  Placenta Disrupted: Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Pregnancy.

Authors:  Jeremy Gingrich; Elvis Ticiani; Almudena Veiga-Lopez
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 12.015

6.  Predictive modeling of biological responses in the rat liver using in vitro Tox21 bioactivity: Benefits from high-throughput toxicokinetics.

Authors:  Caroline Ring; Nisha S Sipes; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Celeste Carberry; Lauren E Koval; William D Klaren; Mark A Harris; Scott S Auerbach; Julia E Rager
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-19

7.  Placental genomic and epigenomic signatures associated with infant birth weight highlight mechanisms involved in collagen and growth factor signaling.

Authors:  Alexis Payton; Jeliyah Clark; Lauren Eaves; Hudson P Santos; Lisa Smeester; Jacqueline T Bangma; T Michael O'Shea; Rebecca C Fry; Julia E Rager
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 8.  Placental outcomes of phthalate exposure.

Authors:  Genoa R Warner; Raquel S Dettogni; Indrani C Bagchi; Jodi A Flaws; Jones B Graceli
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.421

9.  Modernization of chemical risk assessment to make use of novel toxicological data.

Authors: 
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Comparing the Predictivity of Human Placental Gene, microRNA, and CpG Methylation Signatures in Relation to Perinatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Jeliyah Clark; Vennela Avula; Caroline Ring; Lauren A Eaves; Thomas Howard; Hudson P Santos; Lisa Smeester; Jacqueline T Bangma; Thomas Michael O'Shea; Rebecca C Fry; Julia E Rager
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.109

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.