Literature DB >> 19439516

Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines.

Peter D Keightley1, Urmi Trivedi, Marian Thomson, Fiona Oliver, Sujai Kumar, Mark L Blaxter.   

Abstract

We inferred the rate and properties of new spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster by carrying out whole-genome shotgun sequencing-by-synthesis of three mutation accumulation (MA) lines that had been maintained by close inbreeding for an average of 262 generations. We tested for the presence of new mutations by generating alignments of each MA line to the D. melanogaster reference genome sequence and then compared these alignments base by base. We determined empirically that at least five reads at a site within each line are required for accurate single nucleotide mutation calling. We mapped a total of 174 single-nucleotide mutations, giving a single nucleotide mutation rate of 3.5 x 10(-9) per site per generation. There were no false positives in a random sample of 40 of these mutations checked by Sanger sequencing. Variation in the numbers of mutations among the MA lines was small and nonsignificant. Numbers of transition and transversion mutations were 86 and 88, respectively, implying that transition mutation rate is close to 2x the transversion rate. We observed 1.5x as many G or C --> A or T as A or T --> G or C mutations, implying that the G or C --> A or T mutation rate is close to 2x the A or T --> G or C mutation rate. The base composition of the genome is therefore not at an equilibrium determined solely by mutation. The predicted G + C content at mutational equilibrium (33%) is similar to that observed in transposable element remnants. Nearest-neighbor mutational context dependencies are nonsignificant, suggesting that this is a weak phenomenon in Drosophila. We also saw nonsignificant differences in the mutation rate between transcribed and untranscribed regions, implying that any transcription-coupled repair process is weak. Of seven short indel mutations confirmed, six were deletions, consistent with the deletion bias that is thought to exist in Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19439516      PMCID: PMC2704435          DOI: 10.1101/gr.091231.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  24 in total

1.  THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY.

Authors:  T MUKAI
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila.

Authors:  Cathy Haag-Liautard; Mark Dorris; Xulio Maside; Steven Macaskill; Daniel L Halligan; David Houle; Brian Charlesworth; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The response to artificial selection from new mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Caballero; M A Toro; C López-Fanjul
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila.

Authors:  D A Petrov; E R Lozovskaya; D L Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-11-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Genomic heterogeneity of background substitutional patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Patterns of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila and mammalian genomes.

Authors:  D A Petrov; D L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  David J Begun; Alisha K Holloway; Kristian Stevens; Ladeana W Hillier; Yu-Ping Poh; Matthew W Hahn; Phillip M Nista; Corbin D Jones; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Lior Pachter; Eugene Myers; Charles H Langley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila.

Authors:  E N Moriyama; J R Powell
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Genomic selective constraints in murid noncoding DNA.

Authors:  Daniel J Gaffney; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  182 in total

1.  Pervasive multinucleotide mutational events in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider; Jonathan N Hourmozdi; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Charles H Langley; Kristian Stevens; Charis Cardeno; Yuh Chwen G Lee; Daniel R Schrider; John E Pool; Sasha A Langley; Charlyn Suarez; Russell B Corbett-Detig; Bryan Kolaczkowski; Shu Fang; Phillip M Nista; Alisha K Holloway; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Yun S Song; Matthew W Hahn; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Mutation and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Phylogenomic analysis of the uracil-DNA glycosylase superfamily.

Authors:  J Ignacio Lucas-Lledó; Rohan Maddamsetti; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  The effects of demography and linkage on the estimation of selection and mutation parameters.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Simultaneous Estimation of Additive and Mutational Genetic Variance in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; J David Aguirre; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Stabilizing selection, purifying selection, and mutational bias in finite populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The effect of spontaneous mutations on competitive ability.

Authors:  S Schaack; D E Allen; L C Latta; K K Morgan; M Lynch
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Universally high transcript error rates in bacteria.

Authors:  Weiyi Li; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.