Literature DB >> 15520267

Genomic heterogeneity of background substitutional patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.

Nadia D Singh1, Peter F Arndt, Dmitri A Petrov.   

Abstract

Mutation is the underlying force that provides the variation upon which evolutionary forces can act. It is important to understand how mutation rates vary within genomes and how the probabilities of fixation of new mutations vary as well. If substitutional processes across the genome are heterogeneous, then examining patterns of coding sequence evolution without taking these underlying variations into account may be misleading. Here we present the first rigorous test of substitution rate heterogeneity in the Drosophila melanogaster genome using almost 1500 nonfunctional fragments of the transposable element DNAREP1_DM. Not only do our analyses suggest that substitutional patterns in heterochromatic and euchromatic sequences are different, but also they provide support in favor of a recombination-associated substitutional bias toward G and C in this species. The magnitude of this bias is entirely sufficient to explain recombination-associated patterns of codon usage on the autosomes of the D. melanogaster genome. We also document a bias toward lower GC content in the pattern of small insertions and deletions (indels). In addition, the GC content of noncoding DNA in Drosophila is higher than would be predicted on the basis of the pattern of nucleotide substitutions and small indels. However, we argue that the fast turnover of noncoding sequences in Drosophila makes it difficult to assess the importance of the GC biases in nucleotide substitutions and small indels in shaping the base composition of noncoding sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15520267      PMCID: PMC1449091          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.032250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  40 in total

Review 1.  Variation in recombination rate across the genome: evidence and implications.

Authors:  Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans.

Authors:  Ines Hellmann; Ingo Ebersberger; Susan E Ptak; Svante Pääbo; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  DNA sequence evolution with neighbor-dependent mutation.

Authors:  Peter F Arndt; Christopher B Burge; Terence Hwa
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Size matters: non-LTR retrotransposable elements and ectopic recombination in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dmitri A Petrov; Yael T Aminetzach; Jerel C Davis; Douda Bensasson; Aaron E Hirsh
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Rapid sequence turnover at an intergenic locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Distinct changes of genomic biases in nucleotide substitution at the time of Mammalian radiation.

Authors:  Peter F Arndt; Dmitri A Petrov; Terence Hwa
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-07-28       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Neutral effect of recombination on base composition in Drosophila.

Authors:  Gabriel Marais; Dominique Mouchiroud; Laurent Duret
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Hill-Robertson interference in Drosophila melanogaster: reply to Marais, Mouchiroud and Duret.

Authors:  Richard M Kliman; Jody Hey
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Molecular paleontology of transposable elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Vladimir V Kapitonov; Jerzy Jurka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  55 in total

1.  Adaptive impact of the chimeric gene Quetzalcoatl in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Rebekah L Rogers; Trevor Bedford; Ana M Lyons; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  GC-biased segregation of noncoding polymorphisms in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nicolas Galtier; Eric Bazin; Nicolas Bierne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Fine-scale crossover rate heterogeneity in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Cirulli; Richard M Kliman; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  No effect of recombination on the efficacy of natural selection in primates.

Authors:  Kevin Bullaughey; Molly Przeworski; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Studying patterns of recent evolution at synonymous sites and intronic sites in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  The correlation between recombination rate and dinucleotide bias in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Guoqing Liu; Hong Li
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Overdispersion of the molecular clock: temporal variation of gene-specific substitution rates in Drosophila.

Authors:  Trevor Bedford; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Recombination yet inefficient selection along the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup's fourth chromosome.

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Yue Zhang; Tomoyuki Kado; Chuanzhu Fan; Ruoping Zhao; Hideki Innan; Wen Wang; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Genome-wide patterns of adaptation to temperate environments associated with transposable elements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Josefa González; Talia L Karasov; Philipp W Messer; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Quantifying adaptive evolution in the Drosophila immune system.

Authors:  Darren J Obbard; John J Welch; Kang-Wook Kim; Francis M Jiggins
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.