Literature DB >> 17203060

Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila.

Cathy Haag-Liautard1, Mark Dorris, Xulio Maside, Steven Macaskill, Daniel L Halligan, David Houle, Brian Charlesworth, Peter D Keightley.   

Abstract

Spontaneous mutations are the source of genetic variation required for evolutionary change, and are therefore important for many aspects of evolutionary biology. For example, the divergence between taxa at neutrally evolving sites in the genome is proportional to the per nucleotide mutation rate, u (ref. 1), and this can be used to date speciation events by assuming a molecular clock. The overall rate of occurrence of deleterious mutations in the genome each generation (U) appears in theories of nucleotide divergence and polymorphism, the evolution of sex and recombination, and the evolutionary consequences of inbreeding. However, estimates of U based on changes in allozymes or DNA sequences and fitness traits are discordant. Here we directly estimate u in Drosophila melanogaster by scanning 20 million bases of DNA from three sets of mutation accumulation lines by using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. From 37 mutation events that we detected, we obtained a mean estimate for u of 8.4 x 10(-9) per generation. Moreover, we detected significant heterogeneity in u among the three mutation-accumulation-line genotypes. By multiplying u by an estimate of the fraction of mutations that are deleterious in natural populations of Drosophila, we estimate that U is 1.2 per diploid genome. This high rate suggests that selection against deleterious mutations may have a key role in explaining patterns of genetic variation in the genome, and help to maintain recombination and sexual reproduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17203060     DOI: 10.1038/nature05388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  170 in total

1.  Optimized filtering reduces the error rate in detecting genomic variants by short-read sequencing.

Authors:  Joke Reumers; Peter De Rijk; Hui Zhao; Anthony Liekens; Dominiek Smeets; John Cleary; Peter Van Loo; Maarten Van Den Bossche; Kirsten Catthoor; Bernard Sabbe; Evelyn Despierre; Ignace Vergote; Brian Hilbush; Diether Lambrechts; Jurgen Del-Favero
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Evidence for elevated mutation rates in low-quality genotypes.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Alan Hodgkinson; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  The fuel of evolution.

Authors:  C López-Fanjul; A García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Genetic linkage and natural selection.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Mutation and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.

Authors:  M A Mallet; A K Chippindale
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.