Literature DB >> 19425661

Sensitivity of the human auditory system to temporal fine structure at high frequencies.

Brian C J Moore1, Aleksander Sek.   

Abstract

The frequency of sounds is coded partly by phase locking to the temporal fine structure (TFS) of the waveform evoked on the basilar membrane. On the basis of data obtained using sinusoids, it is usually assumed that in mammals, including humans, TFS information becomes unusable for frequencies above about 5000 Hz. Here, sensitivity to the TFS of complex sounds up to much higher frequencies is demonstrated. Subjects discriminated a harmonic complex tone, with a fundamental frequency F0, from a tone in which all harmonics were shifted upwards by the same amount in hertz. The phases of the components were selected randomly for every stimulus. Both tones had an envelope repetition rate equal to F0, but the tones differed in their TFS. To prevent discrimination based on spectral cues, the tones were passed through a fixed bandpass filter, centered at 14F0. A background noise was used to mask combination tones. Performance was well above chance for most subjects when F0 was 800 or 1000 Hz and all audible components were above 8000 Hz. Supplementary experiments confirmed that performance was not based on changes in the excitation pattern or on the discrimination of partially resolved components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19425661     DOI: 10.1121/1.3106525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Implications of within-fiber temporal coding for perceptual studies of F0 discrimination and discrimination of harmonic and inharmonic tone complexes.

Authors:  Sushrut Kale; Christophe Micheyl; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06

3.  On the possibility of a place code for the low pitch of high-frequency complex tones.

Authors:  Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Pitch perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Pitch perception beyond the traditional existence region of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler; Adam Loper; Sébastien Santurette
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The burst gap is a peripheral temporal code for pitch perception that is shared across audition and touch.

Authors:  Deepak Sharma; Kevin K W Ng; Ingvars Birznieks; Richard M Vickery
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Susan R S Bissmeyer; Andres Camarena
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-03

8.  The role of excitation-pattern cues in the detection of frequency shifts in bandpass-filtered complex tones.

Authors:  Frederic Marmel; Christopher J Plack; Kathryn Hopkins; Robert P Carlyon; Hedwig E Gockel; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  On musical interval perception for complex tones at very high frequencies.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory frequency and intensity discrimination explained using a cortical population rate code.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Paul R Schrater; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.