Literature DB >> 19412318

Finding a mate at a cocktail party: Spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs.

Mark A Bee1.   

Abstract

The 'cocktail party problem' refers to the difficulty that humans have in recognizing speech in noisy social environments. Many non-human animals also communicate acoustically in noisy social aggregations, and thus also encounter - and solve - cocktail-party-like problems. Relatively few studies, however, have investigated the processes by which non-human animals solve sound source segregation problems in the behaviourally relevant context of acoustic communication. In humans, 'spatial release from masking' contributes to sound source segregation by improving the ability of listeners to recognize speech that is spatially separated from other sources of speech or 'speech-shaped' masking noise. Using a phonotaxis paradigm, I tested the hypothesis that spatial release from masking improves the ability of female grey treefrogs, Hyla chrysoscelis, to discriminate between conspecific and heterospecific calls that were spatially separated from two sources of 'chorus-shaped' masking noise by either 15° or 90°. As the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was decreased from +3 dB to -15 dB (by decreasing the signal level in 6-dB steps), fewer females made a choice and the likelihood of a female choosing the heterospecific call also increased. At a SNR of -3 dB, females oriented toward and chose the conspecific call in the 90° separation condition, but not when signals and maskers were separated by 15°. These results support the hypothesis that a well-known solution to the cocktail party problem in humans - spatial release from masking - also plays a role in acoustic signal recognition in animals that communicate in biological equivalents of cocktail-party-like environments.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19412318      PMCID: PMC2430100          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  19 in total

Review 1.  Neural basis of hearing in real-world situations.

Authors:  A S Feng; R Ratnam
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.

Authors:  Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources.

Authors:  John F Culling; Monica L Hawley; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Polyploids with different origins and ancestors form a single sexual polyploid species.

Authors:  Alisha K Holloway; David C Cannatella; H Carl Gerhardt; David M Hillis
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Detection of auditory signals by frog inferior collicular neurons in the presence of spatially separated noise.

Authors:  R Ratnam; A S Feng
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Free-field binaural unmasking in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Micheal L Dent; Ole N Larsen; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Auditory scene analysis by songbirds: stream segregation of birdsong by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  S H Hulse; S A MacDougall-Shackleton; A B Wisniewski
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Non-territorial nightingales prospect territories during the dawn chorus.

Authors:  Valentin Amrhein; Hansjoerg P Kunc; Marc Naguib
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Some auditory discrimination experiments on marine fish.

Authors:  C J Chapman; A D Johnstone
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  42 in total

1.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Multiple signals and male spacing affect female preference at cocktail parties in treefrogs.

Authors:  Christina Richardson; Thierry Lengagne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Joshua J Schwartz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs.

Authors:  Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Ecology of acoustic signalling and the problem of masking interference in insects.

Authors:  Arne K D Schmidt; Rohini Balakrishnan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Sound transmission and the recognition of temporally degraded sexual advertisement signals in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Authors:  Michael C Kuczynski; Alejandro Vélez; Joshua J Schwartz; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 7.  Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 8.  Sound source perception in anuran amphibians.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: Signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Spatial hearing in Cope's gray treefrog: I. Open and closed loop experiments on sound localization in the presence and absence of noise.

Authors:  Michael S Caldwell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.