Literature DB >> 21811239

Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs.

Hamilton E Farris1, Michael J Ryan.   

Abstract

Whereas many studies on mate choice have measured the relative attractiveness of acoustic sexual signals, there is little understanding of another critical process: grouping and assigning the signals to their sources. For female túngara frogs, assigning the distinct components of male calls to the correct source is a challenge because males sing in aggregations, producing overlapping calls that lead to perceptual errors analogous to those of the 'cocktail party problem'. Here we show that for presentation of >2 call components, however, subjects are more likely to group the two components with the smallest relative differences in call parameters, including relative spatial separation (a primitive acoustic cue) and relative similarity to the species-specific call sequence (a schema-based cue). Thus, like humans, the cognitive rules for the perception of auditory groups amidst multiple sound sources include the use of relative comparisons, a flexible strategy for dynamic acoustic environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21811239     DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  33 in total

1.  The influence of spatial separation on divided listening.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Frederick J Gallun; Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Combination of binaural information across frequency bands.

Authors:  T N Buell; E R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Directional hearing in the gray tree frog Hyla versicolor: eardrum vibrations and phonotaxis.

Authors:  M B Jørgensen; H C Gerhardt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Effects of ear of entry and perceived location of synchronous and asynchronous components on mistuning detection.

Authors:  H Gockel; R P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Complexity increases working memory for mating signals.

Authors:  Karin L Akre; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Perceived continuity of gliding and steady-state tones through interrupting noise.

Authors:  V Ciocca; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-11

7.  Perceiving vowels in the presence of another sound: constraints on formant perception.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Brian R Glasberg; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Does common spatial origin promote the auditory grouping of temporally separated signal elements in grey treefrogs?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Kasen K Riemersma
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  12 in total

1.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Schema vs. primitive perceptual grouping: the relative weighting of sequential vs. spatial cues during an auditory grouping task in frogs.

Authors:  Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Animal models for auditory streaming.

Authors:  Naoya Itatani; Georg M Klump
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 5.  Sound source perception in anuran amphibians.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Spatial hearing in Cope's gray treefrog: I. Open and closed loop experiments on sound localization in the presence and absence of noise.

Authors:  Michael S Caldwell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Spatial hearing in Cope's gray treefrog: II. Frequency-dependent directionality in the amplitude and phase of tympanum vibrations.

Authors:  Michael S Caldwell; Norman Lee; Katrina M Schrode; Anastasia R Johns; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Female túngara frogs do not experience the continuity illusion.

Authors:  Alexander T Baugh; Michael J Ryan; Ximena E Bernal; A Stanley Rand; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Do frog-eating bats perceptually bind the complex components of frog calls?

Authors:  Patricia L Jones; Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan; Rachel A Page
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.