Literature DB >> 9862889

Detection of auditory signals by frog inferior collicular neurons in the presence of spatially separated noise.

R Ratnam1, A S Feng.   

Abstract

Detection of auditory signals by frog inferior collicular neurons in the presence of spatially separated noise. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2848-2859, 1998. Psychophysical studies have shown that the ability to detect auditory signals embedded in noise improves when signal and noise sources are widely separated in space; this allows humans to analyze complex auditory scenes, as in the cocktail-part effect. Although these studies established that improvements in detection threshold (DT) are due to binaural hearing, few physiological studies were undertaken, and very little is known about the response of single neurons to spatially separated signal and noise sources. To address this issue we examined the responses of neurons in the frog inferior colliculus (IC) to a probe stimulus embedded in a spatially separated masker. Frogs perform auditory scene analysis because females select mates in dense choruses by means of auditory cues. Results of the extracellular single-unit recordings demonstrate that 22% of neurons (A-type) exhibited improvements in signal DTs when probe and masker sources were progressively separated in azimuth. In contrast, 24% of neurons (V-type) showed the opposite pattern, namely, signal DTs were lowest when probe and masker were colocalized (in many instances lower than the DT to probe alone) and increased when the two sound sources were separated. The remaining neurons demonstrated a mix of these two types of patterns. An intriguing finding was the strong correlation between A-type masking release patterns and phasic neurons and a weaker correlation between V-type patterns and tonic neurons. Although not decisive, these results suggest that phasic units may play a role in release from masking observed psychophysically. Analysis of the data also revealed a strong and nonlinear interaction among probe, masker, and masker azimuth and that signal DTs were influenced by two factors: 1) the unit's sensitivity to probe in the presence of masker and 2) the criterion level for estimating DT. For some units, it was possible to examine the interaction between these two factors and gain insights into the variation of DTs with masker azimuth. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to signal detection in the auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9862889     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.2848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  18 in total

1.  GABA is involved in spatial unmasking in the frog auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Wen-Yu Lin; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 3.  Sound source perception in anuran amphibians.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Spatial release from masking improves sound pattern discrimination along a biologically relevant pulse-rate continuum in gray treefrogs.

Authors:  Jessica L Ward; Nathan P Buerkle; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Sound level discrimination by gray treefrogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Alejandro Vélez; James D Forester
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  When signal meets noise: immunity of the frog ear to interference.

Authors:  Mario Penna; Juan Pablo Gormaz; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-04-30

10.  Inherent Directionality Determines Spatial Release from Masking at the Tympanum in a Vertebrate with Internally Coupled Ears.

Authors:  Michael S Caldwell; Norman Lee; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.