Literature DB >> 19894854

Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.

Mark A Bee1, Joshua J Schwartz.   

Abstract

Anuran amphibians are superb animal models for investigating the mechanisms underlying acoustic signal perception amid high levels of background noise generated by large social aggregations of vocalizing individuals. Yet there are not well-established methods for quantifying a number of key measures of auditory perception in frogs, in part, because frogs are notoriously difficult subjects for traditional psychoacoustic experiments based on classical or operant conditioning. A common experimental approach for studying frog hearing and acoustic communication involves behavioral phonotaxis experiments, in which patterns of movement directed toward sound sources indicate the subjects' perceptual experiences. In this study, three different phonotaxis experiments were conducted using the same target signals and noise maskers to compare different experimental methods and analytical tools for deriving estimates of signal recognition thresholds in the presence or absence of "chorus-shaped noise" (i.e., artificial noise with a spectrum similar to that of real breeding choruses). Estimates of recognition thresholds based on measures of angular orientation, response probabilities, and response latencies were quite similar in both two-choice and no-choice phonotaxis tests. These results establish important baselines for comparing different methods of estimating signal recognition thresholds in frogs tested in various masking noise conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19894854      PMCID: PMC2787082          DOI: 10.1121/1.3224707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

Review 1.  Neural basis of hearing in real-world situations.

Authors:  A S Feng; R Ratnam
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frog Hyla ebraccata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs.

Authors:  Johannes Schul; Sarah L Bush
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Polyploids with different origins and ancestors form a single sexual polyploid species.

Authors:  Alisha K Holloway; David C Cannatella; H Carl Gerhardt; David M Hillis
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.

Authors:  R Plomp; A M Mimpen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The neuroethology of frequency preferences in the spring peeper.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 7.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Finding a mate at a cocktail party: Spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Parallel female preferences for call duration in a diploid ancestor of an allotetraploid treefrog.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Hearing threshold and frequency discrimination in the purely aquatic frog Xenopus laevis (Pipidae): measurement by means of conditioning.

Authors:  A Elepfandt; I Eistetter; A Fleig; E Günther; M Hainich; S Hepperle; B Traub
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  26 in total

1.  Masking release in temporally fluctuating noise depends on comodulation and overall level in Cope's gray treefrog.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Alejandro Vélez
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Differential effects of sound level and temporal structure of calls on phonotaxis by female gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor.

Authors:  Kevin W Christie; Johannes Schul; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Sound transmission and the recognition of temporally degraded sexual advertisement signals in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Authors:  Michael C Kuczynski; Alejandro Vélez; Joshua J Schwartz; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 5.  Sound source perception in anuran amphibians.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: Signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Pulse-number discrimination by Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) in modulated and unmodulated noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Betsy Jo Linehan-Skillings; Yuwen Gu; Yuting Sun; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spatial hearing in Cope's gray treefrog: I. Open and closed loop experiments on sound localization in the presence and absence of noise.

Authors:  Michael S Caldwell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Gerlinde Höbel; Noah M Gordon; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.