OBJECTIVE: Autotitrating continuous positive airway pressure (auto-CPAP) devices now have a smart card (a pocket-sized card with embedded integrated circuits which records data from the CPAP machine such as CPAP usage, CPAP pressure, large leak, etc.) which can estimate the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) on therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of auto-CPAP in estimating the residual AHI in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who were treated with auto-CPAP without a CPAP titration study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 99 patients with OSA from April 2005 to May 2007 who underwent a repeat sleep study using auto-CPAP. The estimated AHI from auto-CPAP was compared with the AHI from an overnight polysomnogram (PSG) on auto-CPAP using Bland-Altman plot and likelihood ratio analyses. A PSG AHI cutoff of five events per hour was used to differentiate patients optimally treated with auto-CPAP from those with residual OSA on therapy. RESULTS: Bland and Altman analysis showed good agreement between auto-CPAP AHI and PSG AHI. There was no significant bias when smart card estimates of AHI at home were compared to smart card estimates obtained in the sleep laboratory. An auto-CPAP cutoff for the AHI of six events per hour was shown to be optimal for differentiating patients with and without residual OSA with a sensitivity of 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 0.98) and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.95) with a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 9.6 (95% CI 5.1 to 21.5) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.085 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.25). Auto-CPAP AHI of eight events per hour yielded the optimal sensitivity (0.94, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99) and specificity (0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95) with a positive LR of 9.6 (95% CI 5.23 to 20.31) and a negative LR of 0.065 (95% CI 0.004 to 0.279) to identify patients with a PSG AHI of > or = 10 events per hour. CONCLUSION: Auto-CPAP estimate of AHI may be used to estimate residual AHI in patients with OSA of varying severity treated with auto-CPAP.
OBJECTIVE: Autotitrating continuous positive airway pressure (auto-CPAP) devices now have a smart card (a pocket-sized card with embedded integrated circuits which records data from the CPAP machine such as CPAP usage, CPAP pressure, large leak, etc.) which can estimate the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) on therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of auto-CPAP in estimating the residual AHI in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who were treated with auto-CPAP without a CPAP titration study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 99 patients with OSA from April 2005 to May 2007 who underwent a repeat sleep study using auto-CPAP. The estimated AHI from auto-CPAP was compared with the AHI from an overnight polysomnogram (PSG) on auto-CPAP using Bland-Altman plot and likelihood ratio analyses. A PSG AHI cutoff of five events per hour was used to differentiate patients optimally treated with auto-CPAP from those with residual OSA on therapy. RESULTS: Bland and Altman analysis showed good agreement between auto-CPAP AHI and PSG AHI. There was no significant bias when smart card estimates of AHI at home were compared to smart card estimates obtained in the sleep laboratory. An auto-CPAP cutoff for the AHI of six events per hour was shown to be optimal for differentiating patients with and without residual OSA with a sensitivity of 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 0.98) and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.95) with a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 9.6 (95% CI 5.1 to 21.5) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.085 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.25). Auto-CPAP AHI of eight events per hour yielded the optimal sensitivity (0.94, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99) and specificity (0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95) with a positive LR of 9.6 (95% CI 5.23 to 20.31) and a negative LR of 0.065 (95% CI 0.004 to 0.279) to identify patients with a PSG AHI of > or = 10 events per hour. CONCLUSION: Auto-CPAP estimate of AHI may be used to estimate residual AHI in patients with OSA of varying severity treated with auto-CPAP.
Authors: Yüksel Peker; Jan Hedner; Jeanette Norum; Holger Kraiczi; Jan Carlson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Marcel A Baltzan; Ibrahim Kassissia; Osama Elkholi; Mark Palayew; Richard Dabrusin; Norman Wolkove Journal: Sleep Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Melanie D Cross; Marjorie Vennelle; Heather M Engleman; Sandra White; Thomas W Mackay; Sarah Twaddle; Neil J Douglas Journal: Sleep Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Stephen D Pittman; Giora Pillar; Richard B Berry; Atul Malhotra; Mary M MacDonald; David P White Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Clete A Kushida; Alejandro Chediak; Richard B Berry; Lee K Brown; David Gozal; Conrad Iber; Sairam Parthasarathy; Stuart F Quan; James A Rowley Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Clete A Kushida; Michael R Littner; Max Hirshkowitz; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Cathy A Alessi; Dennis Bailey; Brian Boehlecke; Terry M Brown; Jack Coleman; Leah Friedman; Sheldon Kapen; Vishesh K Kapur; Milton Kramer; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Judith Owens; Jeffrey P Pancer; Todd J Swick; Merrill S Wise Journal: Sleep Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Patrícia Caetano Mota; Marta Drummond; João Carlos Winck; Ana Cristina Santos; João Almeida; José Agostinho Marques Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Richard J Schwab; Safwan M Badr; Lawrence J Epstein; Peter C Gay; David Gozal; Malcolm Kohler; Patrick Lévy; Atul Malhotra; Barbara A Phillips; Ilene M Rosen; Kingman P Strohl; Patrick J Strollo; Edward M Weaver; Terri E Weaver Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Joel Reiter; Bashar Zleik; Mihaela Bazalakova; Pankaj Mehta; Robert Joseph Thomas Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Richard B Berry; Clete A Kushida; Meir H Kryger; Haideliza Soto-Calderon; Bethany Staley; Samuel T Kuna Journal: Sleep Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 5.849