Literature DB >> 19381620

Angular displacement perception modulated by force background.

James R Lackner1, Paul DiZio.   

Abstract

We had recumbent subjects (n = 7) indicate the amplitude of imposed, passive yaw-axis body rotations in the 0, 1, and 1.8 g background force levels generated during parabolic flight maneuvers. The blindfolded subject, restrained in a cradle, aligned a gravity-neutral pointer with the subjective vertical while in an initial position and then tried to keep it aligned with the same external direction during a body rotation, lasting less than 1.5 s about the z-axis 30 degrees, 60 degrees, or 120 degrees in amplitude. All the rotations were above semicircular threshold levels for eliciting perception of angular displacement under terrestrial test conditions. In 1 and 1.8 g test conditions, subjects were able to indicate both the subjective vertical and the amplitude of the body rotation reasonably accurately. By contrast in 0 g, when indicating the subjective vertical, they aligned the pointer with the body midline and kept it nearly aligned with their midline during the subsequent body tilts. They also reported feeling supine throughout the 0 g test periods. The attenuation of apparent self-displacement in 0 g is discussed in terms of (1) a possible failure of integration of semicircular canal velocity signals, (2) a contribution of somatosensory pressure and contact cues, and (3) gravicentric versus body-centric reference frames. The significance of the findings for predicting and preventing motion sickness and disorientation in orbital space flight and in rotating artificial gravity environments is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19381620     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1785-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  Head direction cells in the primate pre-subiculum.

Authors:  R G Robertson; E T Rolls; P Georges-François; S Panzeri
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Three-dimensional spatial selectivity of hippocampal neurons during space flight.

Authors:  J J Knierim; B L McNaughton; G R Poe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Oculogravic illusion.

Authors:  A GRAYBIEL
Journal:  AMA Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1952-11

4.  Mechanisms of human static spatial orientation.

Authors:  S B Bortolami; S Rocca; S Daros; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Vestibular thresholds for yaw rotation about an earth-vertical axis as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Luzia Grabherr; Keyvan Nicoucar; Fred W Mast; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of gravitoinertial force level on the subjective vertical during recumbent yaw axis body tilt.

Authors:  A S Bryan; S B Bortolami; J Ventura; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The effect of angular acceleration on sound localization; the audiogyral illusion.

Authors:  B CLARK; A GRAYBIEL
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  1949-07

8.  Coriolis cross-coupling effects: disorienting and nauseogenic or not?

Authors:  F E Guedry; A J Benson
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1978-01

Review 9.  Head direction cells and the neurophysiological basis for a sense of direction.

Authors:  J S Taube
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Head direction cell activity monitored in a novel environment and during a cue conflict situation.

Authors:  J S Taube; H L Burton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

1.  Motion sickness induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR).

Authors:  Mingjia Dai; Sofronis Sofroniou; Mikhail Kunin; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Direction of balance and perception of the upright are perceptually dissociable.

Authors:  Heather Panic; Alexander Sacha Panic; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Learning dynamic control of body yaw orientation.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Learning dynamic balancing in the roll plane with and without gravitational cues.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  The Importance of Being in Touch.

Authors:  James R Lackner
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.