Literature DB >> 25761954

Direction of balance and perception of the upright are perceptually dissociable.

Heather Panic1, Alexander Sacha Panic2, Paul DiZio3, James R Lackner3.   

Abstract

We examined whether the direction of balance rather than an otolith reference determines the perceived upright. Participants seated in a device that rotated around the roll axis used a joystick to control its motion. The direction of balance of the device, the location where it would not be accelerated to either side, could be offset from the gravitational vertical, a technique introduced by Riccio, Martin, and Stoffregen (J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18: 624-644, 1992). Participants used the joystick to align themselves in different trials with the gravitational vertical, the direction of balance, the upright, or the direction that minimized oscillations. They pressed the joystick trigger whenever they thought they were at the instructed orientation. Achieved angles for the "align with gravity" and "align with the upright" conditions were not different from each other and were significantly displaced past the gravitational vertical opposite from the direction of balance. Mean indicated angles for align with gravity and align with the upright coincided with the gravitational vertical. Both mean achieved and indicated angles for the "minimize oscillations" and "align with the direction of balance" conditions were significantly deviated toward the gravitational vertical. Three control experiments requiring self-settings to instructed orientations only, perceptual judgments only, and perceptual judgments during passive exposure to dynamic roll profiles confirmed that perception of the upright is determined by gravity, not by the direction of balance.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  balance; gravity; inverted pendulum; orientation; otoliths; vehicle control

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25761954      PMCID: PMC4461880          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00737.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  26 in total

1.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. I. Influence of the semicircular canals following post-rotatory tilt.

Authors:  L H Zupan; R J Peterka; D M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing.

Authors:  William H Gage; David A Winter; James S Frank; Allan L Adkin
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  The role of balance dynamics in the active perception of orientation.

Authors:  G E Riccio; E J Martin; T A Stoffregen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Interaction of semicircular canals and otoliths in the processing structure of the subjective zenith.

Authors:  S Glasauer
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-05-22       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Multimodal integration of self-motion cues in the vestibular system: active versus passive translations.

Authors:  Jerome Carriot; Jessica X Brooks; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Gravitoinertial force versus the direction of balance in the perception and control of orientation.

Authors:  G E Riccio; T A Stoffregen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  A balanced view of otolithic function: comment on Stoffregen and Riccio (1988)

Authors:  I S Curthoys; N J Wade
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  An ecological theory of orientation and the vestibular system.

Authors:  T A Stoffregen; G E Riccio
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  A model of the nystagmus induced by off vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  T C Hain
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Linear acceleration perception in the roll plane before and after unilateral vestibular neurectomy.

Authors:  M J Dai; I S Curthoys; G M Halmagyi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  10 in total

1.  Learning dynamic control of body yaw orientation.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning dynamic balancing in the roll plane with and without gravitational cues.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cerebellar Prediction of the Dynamic Sensory Consequences of Gravity.

Authors:  Isabelle Mackrous; Jerome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Learning dynamic control of body roll orientation.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Human manual control precision depends on vestibular sensory precision and gravitational magnitude.

Authors:  Marissa J Rosenberg; Raquel C Galvan-Garza; Torin K Clark; David P Sherwood; Laurence R Young; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Learning and long-term retention of dynamic self-stabilization skills.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  The Importance of Being in Touch.

Authors:  James R Lackner
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Individual motion perception parameters and motion sickness frequency sensitivity in fore-aft motion.

Authors:  Tugrul Irmak; Ksander N de Winkel; Daan M Pool; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Riender Happee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Challenges to the Vestibular System in Space: How the Brain Responds and Adapts to Microgravity.

Authors:  Jérome Carriot; Isabelle Mackrous; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Crash Prediction Using Deep Learning in a Disorienting Spaceflight Analog Balancing Task.

Authors:  Yonglin Wang; Jie Tang; Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; James R Lackner; Paul DiZio; Pengyu Hong
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.566

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.