Literature DB >> 28849394

Learning dynamic balancing in the roll plane with and without gravitational cues.

Vivekanand Pandey Vimal1,2, Paul DiZio3,4,5, James R Lackner3,4,5.   

Abstract

We determined the relative contributions of gravity-dependent positional cues and motion cues to the learning of roll balance control. We hypothesized that gravity-dependent otolith and somatosensory shear forces related to body orientation would yield better initial performance, more rapid learning, and better retention. Blindfolded subjects rode in a device programmed to roll with inverted pendulum dynamics in a vertical (UPRIGHT) or horizontal plane (SUPINE), and used a joystick to align themselves with the direction of balance. Each subject completed five blocks of four 100 s long trials on two consecutive days in one of four groups (n = 10 per group): Group 1, UPRIGHT balancing both days; Group 2, SUPINE both days; Group 3, UPRIGHT then SUPINE; and Group 4, SUPINE then UPRIGHT. On Day 1, UPRIGHT subjects showed better initial performance and greater improvement in performance than SUPINE subjects, who showed improvements only in having fewer deviations exceeding ±60 deg from the direction of balance. Subjects tested UPRIGHT on both days showed full retention of learning across days and additional Day 2 learning, but subjects tested SUPINE on both days showed partial retention of their marginal learning from Day 1 and little improvement on Day 2. Subjects tested SUPINE on Day 2 after being tested UPRIGHT on Day 1 showed no better performance than subjects tested SUPINE on Day 1. By contrast, there was transfer from SUPINE on Day 1 to UPRIGHT on Day 2. We conclude that absence of gravitationally dependent otolith and somatosensory cues degrades balance performance.

Keywords:  Dynamic balance; Orientation; Phase portraits; Somatosensation; Stabilogram diffusion function; Vehicle control; Vestibular system

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28849394     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5068-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  12 in total

1.  Upright, correlated random walks: A statistical-biomechanics approach to the human postural control system.

Authors:  J. J. Collins; C. J. De Luca
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.642

2.  Angular displacement perception modulated by force background.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Rolling into spatial disorientation: simulator demonstration of the post-roll (Gillingham) illusion.

Authors:  Suzanne A E Nooij; Eric L Groen
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2011-05

4.  Direction of balance and perception of the upright are perceptually dissociable.

Authors:  Heather Panic; Alexander Sacha Panic; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Components of postural dyscontrol in the elderly: a review.

Authors:  F B Horak; C L Shupert; A Mirka
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Use of triangular waveforms of angular velocity in the study of vestibulbar function.

Authors:  F E Guedry; C W Stockwell; J W Norman; G G Owens
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Gravitational and Somatosensory Influences on Control and Perception of Roll Balance.

Authors:  Alexander Sacha Panic; Heather Panic; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Aerosp Med Hum Perform       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 1.053

8.  Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories.

Authors:  J J Collins; C J De Luca
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Learning dynamic control of body roll orientation.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Increase above the Age of 40.

Authors:  María Carolina Bermúdez Rey; Torin K Clark; Wei Wang; Tania Leeder; Yong Bian; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  8 in total

1.  Learning dynamic control of body yaw orientation.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Gravity modulates behaviour control strategy.

Authors:  Maria Gallagher; Iqra Arshad; Elisa Raffaella Ferrè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Learning and long-term retention of dynamic self-stabilization skills.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The Importance of Being in Touch.

Authors:  James R Lackner
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Effects of white Gaussian noise on dynamic balance in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Ziyou Zhou; Can Wu; Zhen Hu; Yujuan Chai; Kai Chen; Tetsuya Asakawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Crash Prediction Using Deep Learning in a Disorienting Spaceflight Analog Balancing Task.

Authors:  Yonglin Wang; Jie Tang; Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; James R Lackner; Paul DiZio; Pengyu Hong
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Where is my hand in space? The internal model of gravity influences proprioception.

Authors:  Maria Gallagher; Breanne Kearney; Elisa Raffaella Ferrè
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.812

8.  Roll tilt self-motion direction discrimination training: First evidence for perceptual learning.

Authors:  Manuel P Klaus; C G Schöne; M Hartmann; D M Merfeld; M C Schubert; F W Mast
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.