Literature DB >> 16628400

Mechanisms of human static spatial orientation.

S B Bortolami1, S Rocca, S Daros, P DiZio, J R Lackner.   

Abstract

We have developed a tri-axial model of spatial orientation applicable to static 1g and non-1g environments. The model attempts to capture the mechanics of otolith organ transduction of static linear forces and the perceptual computations performed on these sensor signals to yield subjective orientation of the vertical direction relative to the head. Our model differs from other treatments that involve computing the gravitoinertial force (GIF) vector in three independent dimensions. The perceptual component of our model embodies the idea that the central nervous system processes utricular and saccular stimuli as if they were produced by a GIF vector equal to 1g, even when it differs in magnitude, because in the course of evolution living creatures have always experienced gravity as a constant. We determine just two independent angles of head orientation relative to the vertical that are GIF dependent, the third angle being derived from the first two and being GIF independent. Somatosensory stimulation is used to resolve our vestibular model's ambiguity of the up-down directions. Our otolith mechanical model takes into account recently established non-linear behavior of the force-displacement relationship of the otoconia, and possible otoconial deflections that are not co-linear with the direction of the input force (cross-talk). The free parameters of our model relate entirely to the mechanical otolith model. They were determined by fitting the integrated mechanical/perceptual model to subjective indications of the vertical obtained during pitch and roll body tilts in 1g and 2g force backgrounds and during recumbent yaw tilts in 1g. The complete data set was fit with very little residual error. A novel prediction of the model is that background force magnitude either lower or higher than 1g will not affect subjective vertical judgments during recumbent yaw tilt. These predictions have been confirmed in recent parabolic flight experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16628400     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0387-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates.

Authors:  A D Van Beuzekom; J A Van Gisbergen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Interpretation of a discontinuity in the sense of verticality at large body tilt.

Authors:  Ronald G Kaptein; Jan A M Van Gisbergen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Computation of inertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information.

Authors:  D E Angelaki; M Q McHenry; J D Dickman; S D Newlands; B J Hess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The effect of water immersion on postural and visual orientation.

Authors:  T Jarchow; F W Mast
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1999-09

5.  Visual horizontal-perception in relation to otolith-function.

Authors:  E F Miller; A R Fregly; A Graybiel
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1968-12

Review 6.  Otolith-organ mechanics: lumped parameter model and dynamic response.

Authors:  W Grant; W Best
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1987-10

7.  Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L Zupan; R J Peterka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt.

Authors:  D M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L H Zupan; C A Gifford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  16 in total

1.  Localization of the subjective vertical during roll, pitch, and recumbent yaw body tilt.

Authors:  Simone B Bortolami; Alberto Pierobon; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of gravitoinertial force level on the subjective vertical during recumbent yaw axis body tilt.

Authors:  A S Bryan; S B Bortolami; J Ventura; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Angular displacement perception modulated by force background.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Computational approaches to spatial orientation: from transfer functions to dynamic Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Narayan Ganesan; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Symmetries of a generic utricular projection: neural connectivity and the distribution of utricular information.

Authors:  Thomas Chartrand; Gin McCollum; Douglas A Hanes; Richard D Boyle
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Direction of balance and perception of the upright are perceptually dissociable.

Authors:  Heather Panic; Alexander Sacha Panic; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Weightlessness alters up/down asymmetries in the perception of self-motion.

Authors:  Caty De Saedeleer; Manuel Vidal; Mark Lipshits; Ana Bengoetxea; Ana Maria Cebolla; Alain Berthoz; Guy Cheron; Joseph McIntyre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Egocentric and allocentric reference frames for catching a falling object.

Authors:  Anne Brec'hed Le Séac'h; Patrice Senot; Joseph McIntyre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Influence of multisensory graviceptive information on the apparent zenith.

Authors:  J Carriot; C Cian; A Paillard; P Denise; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Postural sway reduction in aging men and women: relation to brain structure, cognitive status, and stabilizing factors.

Authors:  Edith V Sullivan; Jessica Rose; Torsten Rohlfing; Adolf Pfefferbaum
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.