Literature DB >> 8592189

Head direction cell activity monitored in a novel environment and during a cue conflict situation.

J S Taube1, H L Burton.   

Abstract

1. Recent conceptualizations of the neural systems used during navigation have classified two types of sensory information used by animals: landmark cues and internally based (idiothetic; e.g., vestibular, kinesthetic) sensory cues. Previous studies have identified neurons in the postsubiculum and the anterior thalamic nuclei that discharge as a function of the animal's head direction in the horizontal plane. The present study was designed to determine how animals use head direction (HD) cells for spatial orientation and the types of sensory cues involved. 2. HD cell activity was monitored in the postsubiculum and anterior thalamic nucleus of rats in a dual-chamber apparatus in an experiment that consisted of two phases. In the first phase, HD cell activity was monitored as an animal moved from a familiar environment to a novel environment. It was hypothesized that if HD cells were capable of using idiothetic sensory information, then the direction of maximal discharge should remain relatively unchanged as the animal moved into an environment where it was unfamiliar with the landmark cues. In the second phase, HD cells were monitored under conditions in which a conflict situation was introduced between the established landmark cues and the animal's internally generated sensory cues. 3. HD cells were initially recorded in a cylinder containing a single orientation cue (familiar environment). A door was then opened, and the rat entered a U-shaped passageway leading to a rectangular chamber containing a different prominent cue (novel environment). For most HD cells, the preferred direction remained relatively constant between the cylinder and passageway/rectangle, although many cells showed a small (6-30 degrees) shift in their preferred direction in the novel environment. This directional shift was maintained across different episodes in the passageway/rectangle. 4. Before the next session, the orientation cue in the cylinder was rotated 90 degrees, and the animal returned to the cylinder. The cell's preferred direction usually shifted between 45 and 90 degrees in the same direction. 5. The rat was then permitted to walk back through the passageway into the now-familiar rectangle. Immediately upon entering the passageway, the preferred direction returned to its original (prerotation) orientation and remained at this value while the rat was in the rectangle. When the rat was allowed to walk back into the cylinder, one of three outcomes occurred: 1) the cell's preferred direction shifted, such that it remained linked to the cylinder's rotated cue card; 2) the cell's preferred direction remained unchanged from its orientation in the rectangle; or 3) the cell's preferred direction shifted to a new value that lay between the preferred directions for the rotated cylinder condition and rectangle. 6. There was little change in the HD cell's background firing rate, peak firing rate, or directional firing range for both the novel and cue-conflict situations. 7. Simultaneous recordings from multiple cells in different sessions showed that the preferred directions remained "in register" with one another. Thus, when one HD cell shifted its preferred direction a specific amount, the other HD cell also shifted its preferred direction the same amount. 8. Results across different series within the same animal showed that the amount the preferred direction shifted in the first Novel series was about the same amount as the shifts observed in subsequent Novel series. In contrast, as the animal experienced more Conflict series, HD cells tended to use the cylinder's cue card less as an orientation cue when the animal returned to the rotated cylinder condition from the rectangle. 9. These results suggest that HD cells in the postsubiculum and anterior thalamic nuclei receive information from both landmark and idiothetic sensory cues, and when both types of cues are available, HD cells preferentially use the landmark cues as long as they are perceived

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8592189     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.5.1953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  78 in total

Review 1.  A neural systems analysis of adaptive navigation.

Authors:  S J Mizumori; B G Cooper; S Leutgeb; W E Pratt
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2000 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Head direction cells in rats with hippocampal or overlying neocortical lesions: evidence for impaired angular path integration.

Authors:  E J Golob; J S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Path integration absent in scent-tracking fimbria-fornix rats: evidence for hippocampal involvement in "sense of direction" and "sense of distance" using self-movement cues.

Authors:  I Q Whishaw; B Gorny
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Hippocampal spatial representations require vestibular input.

Authors:  Robert W Stackman; Ann S Clark; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  Coupling between place cells and head direction cells during relative translations and rotations of distal landmarks.

Authors:  D Yoganarasimha; James J Knierim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A role for terrain slope in orienting hippocampal place fields.

Authors:  Kathryn J Jeffery; Rakesh L Anand; Michael I Anderson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Head direction cell representations maintain internal coherence during conflicting proximal and distal cue rotations: comparison with hippocampal place cells.

Authors:  D Yoganarasimha; Xintian Yu; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Acetylcholine contributes to the integration of self-movement cues in head direction cells.

Authors:  Ryan M Yoder; Jeremy H M Chan; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Angular displacement perception modulated by force background.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Head direction cell instability in the anterior dorsal thalamus after lesions of the interpeduncular nucleus.

Authors:  Benjamin J Clark; Asha Sarma; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.