BACKGROUND: The prognostic meaning of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen (USPSA) level after prostatectomy remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an undetectable USPSA level obtained after surgery is a predictor of biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From the Urologic Oncology Database at the University of California San Francisco, 525 men were identified who had a USPSA measurement 1-3 mo postoperatively with at least 2 yr of follow-up. All preoperative and pathologic criteria were recorded. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were stratified based on their initial USPSA level. We defined an undetectable USPSA level at ≤0.05 ng/ml. Recurrence was defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ≥0.2 ng/ml or secondary treatment. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We found that 456 patients (87%) had undetectable USPSA and 69 patients (13%) had detectable USPSA immediately postprostatectomy. A 5-yr recurrence-free rate of 86% was found in the undetectable USPSA group compared with 67% in the detectable USPSA group (p<0.01). For patients with pT3 disease, men with an undetectable USPSA had a 5-yr BCR-free survival rate of 78% compared with 40% for men with a detectable USPSA (p<0.01). A multivariable analysis confirmed that patients with an undetectable USPSA were 67% less likely to recur (hazard ratio: 0.33; 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.55). As the detection level of PSA is lowered, the false-positive rate of BCR necessarily increases. A limitation of the study is its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: An undetectable USPSA after radical prostatectomy is a prognostic indicator of BCR-free survival at 5 yr and may aid in predicting outcome in higher risk patients.
BACKGROUND: The prognostic meaning of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen (USPSA) level after prostatectomy remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an undetectable USPSA level obtained after surgery is a predictor of biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From the Urologic Oncology Database at the University of California San Francisco, 525 men were identified who had a USPSA measurement 1-3 mo postoperatively with at least 2 yr of follow-up. All preoperative and pathologic criteria were recorded. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were stratified based on their initial USPSA level. We defined an undetectable USPSA level at ≤0.05 ng/ml. Recurrence was defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ≥0.2 ng/ml or secondary treatment. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We found that 456 patients (87%) had undetectable USPSA and 69 patients (13%) had detectable USPSA immediately postprostatectomy. A 5-yr recurrence-free rate of 86% was found in the undetectable USPSA group compared with 67% in the detectable USPSA group (p<0.01). For patients with pT3 disease, men with an undetectable USPSA had a 5-yr BCR-free survival rate of 78% compared with 40% for men with a detectable USPSA (p<0.01). A multivariable analysis confirmed that patients with an undetectable USPSA were 67% less likely to recur (hazard ratio: 0.33; 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.55). As the detection level of PSA is lowered, the false-positive rate of BCR necessarily increases. A limitation of the study is its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: An undetectable USPSA after radical prostatectomy is a prognostic indicator of BCR-free survival at 5 yr and may aid in predicting outcome in higher risk patients.
Authors: G D Grossfeld; J J Chang; J M Broering; D P Miller; J Yu; S C Flanders; J M Henning; D M Stier; P R Carroll Journal: J Urol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: C S Killian; L J Emrich; F P Vargas; N Yang; M C Wang; R L Priore; G P Murphy; T M Chu Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1986-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ofer Yossepowitch; Anders Bjartell; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Bertrand D Guillonneau; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Rodolfo Montironi; Franceso Montorsi Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: François Audenet; Elise Seringe; Sarah J Drouin; Eva Comperat; Olivier Cussenot; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-06-03 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Anup Kumar; Srinivas Samavedi; Vladimir Mouraviev; Anthony S Bates; Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Vipul R Patel Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2016-05-31
Authors: David M Rissin; David R Fournier; Tomasz Piech; Cheuk W Kan; Todd G Campbell; Linan Song; Lei Chang; Andrew J Rivnak; Purvish P Patel; Gail K Provuncher; Evan P Ferrell; Stuart C Howes; Brian A Pink; Kaitlin A Minnehan; David H Wilson; David C Duffy Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Stepan Vesely; Ladislav Jarolim; Marek Schmidt; Ivo Minarik; Pavel Dusek; Marko Babjuk Journal: World J Urol Date: 2012-06-10 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Tammy Ho; Leah Gerber; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Joseph C Presti; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: S García-Barreras; F Rozet; I Nunes-Silva; V Srougi; R Sanchez-Salas; E Barret; M Galiano; X Cathelineau Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 3.405