OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic factors of biochemical recurrence in patients who failed to achieve an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed data on 240 men who underwent RP as first-line treatment and who had a PSA assay available at 6 weeks after surgery. Persistent detectable PSA was defined as a PSA level ≥ 0.1 ng/ml at 6 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 83 men presented persistently elevated PSA after RP and 81 had a biochemical recurrence. Median follow-up was 44 months. In univariate analysis, these factors were associated with biochemical recurrence: preoperative PSA level (P < 0.0001), biopsy and pathologic Gleason score (P < 0.001), capsular involvement (P = 0.0001), positive surgical margins (P < 0.0001), pathological stage ≥ T3 (P = 0.0001), and detectable post-operative PSA ≥ 0.1 ng/ml (P = 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, only the detectable post-operative PSA level ≥ 0.1 ng/mL (P = 0.001), positive surgical margins (P = 0.002), and pathological stage ≥ T3 (P < 0.001) were significant. The individual, five-year, PSA-free survival rate for men with post-operative PSA <0.1 ng/ml and ≥ 0.1 ng/ml were 59 and 42%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients who failed to achieve an undetectable PSA after surgery had a subsequent biochemical recurrence in the outcome. A systematic PSA assay 6 weeks after RP could be useful to early identify patients who are likely to recur.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic factors of biochemical recurrence in patients who failed to achieve an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed data on 240 men who underwent RP as first-line treatment and who had a PSA assay available at 6 weeks after surgery. Persistent detectable PSA was defined as a PSA level ≥ 0.1 ng/ml at 6 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 83 men presented persistently elevated PSA after RP and 81 had a biochemical recurrence. Median follow-up was 44 months. In univariate analysis, these factors were associated with biochemical recurrence: preoperative PSA level (P < 0.0001), biopsy and pathologic Gleason score (P < 0.001), capsular involvement (P = 0.0001), positive surgical margins (P < 0.0001), pathological stage ≥ T3 (P = 0.0001), and detectable post-operative PSA ≥ 0.1 ng/ml (P = 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, only the detectable post-operative PSA level ≥ 0.1 ng/mL (P = 0.001), positive surgical margins (P = 0.002), and pathological stage ≥ T3 (P < 0.001) were significant. The individual, five-year, PSA-free survival rate for men with post-operative PSA <0.1 ng/ml and ≥ 0.1 ng/ml were 59 and 42%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients who failed to achieve an undetectable PSA after surgery had a subsequent biochemical recurrence in the outcome. A systematic PSA assay 6 weeks after RP could be useful to early identify patients who are likely to recur.
Authors: Rex Cheung; Ashish M Kamat; Renaud de Crevoisier; Pamela K Allen; Andrew K Lee; Susan L Tucker; Louis Pisters; Richard J Babaian; Deborah Kuban Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Sarah J Drouin; Christophe Vaessen; Vincent Hupertan; Eva Comperat; Vincent Misraï; Alain Haertig; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; François Richard; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: World J Urol Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-07-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Peter Swindle; James A Eastham; Makoto Ohori; Michael W Kattan; Thomas Wheeler; Norio Maru; Kevin Slawin; Peter T Scardino Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Anup Kumar; Srinivas Samavedi; Vladimir Mouraviev; Anthony S Bates; Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Vipul R Patel Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2016-05-31
Authors: Dimple Chakravarty; Parita Ratnani; Li Huang; Zachary Dovey; Stanislaw Sobotka; Roy Berryhill; Harri Merisaari; Majd Al Shaarani; Richa Rai; Ivan Jambor; Kamlesh K Yadav; Sandeep Mittan; Sneha Parekh; Julia Kodysh; Vinayak Wagaskar; Rachel Brody; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Dmitry Rykunov; Boris Reva; Elai Davicioni; Peter Wiklund; Nina Bhardwaj; Sujit S Nair; Ashutosh K Tewari Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: S García-Barreras; F Rozet; I Nunes-Silva; V Srougi; R Sanchez-Salas; E Barret; M Galiano; X Cathelineau Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Jee Soo Park; Kyo Chul Koo; In Young Choi; Ji Youl Lee; Jun Hyuk Hong; Choung-Soo Kim; Hyun Moo Lee; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Koon Ho Rha; Byung Ha Chung; Kwang Suk Lee Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 1.817