Literature DB >> 27245233

Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Anup Kumar1, Srinivas Samavedi2, Vladimir Mouraviev2, Anthony S Bates2, Rafael F Coelho2, Bernardo Rocco2, Vipul R Patel2.   

Abstract

Our aim was to evaluate factors associated with persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and biochemical recurrence following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The study population (N = 5300) consisted of consecutive patients who underwent RARP for localized prostate cancer by a single surgeon (VP) from January 2008 through July 2013. A query of our Institutional Review Board-approved registry identified 162 men with persistently elevated PSA (group A), defined as PSA level ≥0.1 ng/ml at 6 weeks after surgery, who were compared with rest of the cohort group having undetectable PSA, group B (<0.1 ng/ml). A univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the significant association between various variables and the following: (1) persistently elevated PSA, (2) BCR (PSA value ≥0.2 ng/ml) on follow-up in the persistent PSA group. On multivariate analysis, only the following parameters were significantly associated with persistent PSA after RARP-preoperative [PSA >10 ng/ml (p = 0.01), Gleason Score ≥8 (p = 0.001) and clinical stage(p = 0.001)]; postoperative [pathologic stage (p = 0.001), extraprostatic extension (EPE, p = 0.01), lymph node positivity (p = 0.001), positive surgical margin (PSM, p = 0.02), Gleason score (p = 0.01) and tumor volume percent (p < 0.001)]. The mean follow-up was 38.1 months. The BCR was significantly higher in group A as compared to group B(52.47 vs 7.9 %) respectively; p = 0.01). The mean time to BCR was significantly lesser in group A as compared to group B(8.9 vs 21.1 months respectively; p = 0.01). The BCR-free survival rates at 1 year and 3 years were significantly lower statistically in the persistent PSA group in comparison to other groups (69.7 vs 97.3 % and 48.5 vs 92.1 %, respectively; p = 0.01). On multivariate logistic regression analysis in patients with persistent PSA on follow-up, preoperative PSA >10 ng/ml, postoperative Gleason score ≥8, postoperative stage ≥pT3, positive pelvic lymph nodes, PSM >3 mm and post-RARP PSA doubling time (DT) <10 months (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with BCR. In patients after RARP, factors associated with aggressive disease (high preoperative PSA, Gleason score ≥8, stage ≥T3, PSM, high tumor volume percent and EPE) predict PSA persistence. Although these patients with persistent PSA after RARP are more likely to have BCR and that too earlier than those patients with undetectable PSA after RARP, a significant proportion of these patients (47.53 %) remain free of BCR. This subset of patients is associated with these favorable parameters (preoperative PSA <10 ng/ml, post-RARP PSA DT ≥10 months, postoperative Gleason score <8, pathologic stage <pT3, PSM <3 mm and no lymph node involvement), thus potentially not requiring any adjuvant treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oncologic outcome; Predictive factors; Prostate-specific antigen; Prostatectomy; Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27245233     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0606-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  36 in total

1.  Deaths: preliminary data for 2000.

Authors:  A M Minino; B L Smith
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2001-10-09

Review 2.  Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Stefano Cavalleri; Giacomo Novara; Maurizio Aragona; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Andrea Cestari; Antonio Galfano; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul Patel; Jens Rassweiler; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  M Han; A W Partin; C R Pound; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Continence, potency and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: early trifecta results of a high-volume surgeon.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Rafael F Coelho; Sanket Chauhan; Marcelo A Orvieto; Kenneth J Palmer; Bernardo Rocco; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Geoff Coughlin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Rafael F Coelho; Sanket Chauhan; Kenneth J Palmer; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ignacio Camacho; Geoff Coughlin; Bernardo Rocco
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Sanket Chauhan; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Kenneth J Palmer; Geoff Coughlin; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery?

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Rafael F Coelho; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Oscar Schatloff; Sanket Chauhan; Haidar M Abdul-Muhsin; Rair Jose Valero Carrion; Kenneth J Palmer; Jun Cheon; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Anne-Michelle Noone; Angela B Mariotto; Edgar P Simard; Francis P Boscoe; S Jane Henley; Ahmedin Jemal; Hyunsoon Cho; Robert N Anderson; Betsy A Kohler; Christie R Eheman; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Epidemiology of prostate cancer.

Authors:  E David Crawford
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  8 in total

1.  Benefits of early salvage therapy on oncological outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer with persistent PSA after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  D Milonas; A Laenen; Z Venclovas; L Jarusevicius; G Devos; S Joniau
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Predictive factors and the important role of detectable prostate-specific antigen for detection of clinical recurrence and cancer-specific mortality following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  S García-Barreras; F Rozet; I Nunes-Silva; V Srougi; R Sanchez-Salas; E Barret; M Galiano; X Cathelineau
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Validation of American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth staging system among prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-11-08

Review 4.  Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Lijin Zhang; Bin Wu; Zhenlei Zha; Hu Zhao; Yuefang Jiang; Jun Yuan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Factors affecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy in patients with positive and negative surgical margin.

Authors:  Serdar Celik; Anıl Eker; İbrahim Halil Bozkurt; Deniz Bolat; İsmail Basmacı; Ertuğrul Şefik; Tansu Değirmenci; Bülent Günlüsoy
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2020-09-17

6.  Reply to: Kumsar S. Re: Kupski T, Małek M, Mor I. The association of a risk group with positive margin in the intraoperative and final pathology examination after robotic radical prostatectomy. Cent European J Urol. 2021; 74: 491-495.

Authors:  Tomasz Kupski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2022-01-22

7.  The Significance of Prostate Specific Antigen Persistence in Prostate Cancer Risk Groups on Long-Term Oncological Outcomes.

Authors:  Daimantas Milonas; Zilvinas Venclovas; Gustas Sasnauskas; Tomas Ruzgas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Worth a local treatment? - Analysis of modern radiotherapy concepts for oligometastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Oertel; S Scobioala; K Kroeger; A Baehr; L Stegger; U Haverkamp; M Schäfers; H-T Eich
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.