PURPOSE: Contemporary tools estimating increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa) relapse after radical prostatectomy (RP) are far from perfect and there has been an intensive search for additional predictive variables. We aimed to explore whether the parameters of postoperative ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline provide additional information for predicting PCa progression. METHODS: A total of 319 consecutive men, with at least 2 years of follow-up after RP for clinically localized PCa were subjected to this study. Intensive postoperative measurements of ultrasensitive PSA resulted in total of 4028 PSA values available for statistical evaluation. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml. The accuracy of predictive models was quantified with the area under the curve. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 43 months (24-99 months), 107 patients (34%) experienced BCR after RP. In patients with BCR, significantly higher values of PSA nadir (p < 0.001) and a decreased time interval from surgery to reach PSA nadir (p < 0.001) were observed. A multivariable Cox regression model confirmed that PSA nadir >0.01 ng/ml (HR 6.01, 95% CI: 3.89-9.52) and time to PSA nadir <3 months (HR 2.86, 95% CI: 1.74-5.01) were independent predictors of BCR. The inclusion of PSA nadir and the time to PSA nadir into the model resulted in improvement of predictive accuracy by 16% over the model designed on the basis of established parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the level of PSA nadir and the time to PSA nadir determined by ultrasensitive assay significantly improve the identification of patients who are at high risk of disease recurrence after RP.
PURPOSE: Contemporary tools estimating increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa) relapse after radical prostatectomy (RP) are far from perfect and there has been an intensive search for additional predictive variables. We aimed to explore whether the parameters of postoperative ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline provide additional information for predicting PCa progression. METHODS: A total of 319 consecutive men, with at least 2 years of follow-up after RP for clinically localized PCa were subjected to this study. Intensive postoperative measurements of ultrasensitive PSA resulted in total of 4028 PSA values available for statistical evaluation. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml. The accuracy of predictive models was quantified with the area under the curve. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 43 months (24-99 months), 107 patients (34%) experienced BCR after RP. In patients with BCR, significantly higher values of PSA nadir (p < 0.001) and a decreased time interval from surgery to reach PSA nadir (p < 0.001) were observed. A multivariable Cox regression model confirmed that PSA nadir >0.01 ng/ml (HR 6.01, 95% CI: 3.89-9.52) and time to PSA nadir <3 months (HR 2.86, 95% CI: 1.74-5.01) were independent predictors of BCR. The inclusion of PSA nadir and the time to PSA nadir into the model resulted in improvement of predictive accuracy by 16% over the model designed on the basis of established parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the level of PSA nadir and the time to PSA nadir determined by ultrasensitive assay significantly improve the identification of patients who are at high risk of disease recurrence after RP.
Authors: Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-07-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Felix K-H Chun; Markus Graefen; Mario Zacharias; Alexander Haese; Thomas Steuber; Thorsten Schlomm; Jochen Walz; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Hartwig Huland Journal: World J Urol Date: 2006-02-28 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Shahrokh F Shariat; Jose A Karam; Jochen Walz; Claus G Roehrborn; Francesco Montorsi; Vitaly Margulis; Fred Saad; Kevin M Slawin; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stephanie L Skove; Lauren E Howard; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Matthew R Cooperberg; Daniel M Moreira; Stephen J Freedland Journal: Urology Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Alexander W Pastuszak; Amy M Pearlman; Win Shun Lai; Guilherme Godoy; Kumaran Sathyamoorthy; Joceline S Liu; Brian J Miles; Larry I Lipshultz; Mohit Khera Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 7.450