S Richner-Wunderlin1, A F Mannion2, A Vila-Casademunt3, F Pellise3, M Serra-Burriel3, B Seifert4, E Aghayev2, E Acaroglu5, A Alanay6, F J S Pérez-Grueso7, I Obeid8, F Kleinstück2. 1. Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland. Sarah.Richner-Wunderlin@kws.ch. 2. Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 5. Ankara Spine Center, Ankara, Turkey. 6. Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey. 7. Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain. 8. Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate factors that distinguish between patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) with and without an indication for surgery, irrespective of their final treatment. METHODS: Baseline variables (demographics, medical history, outcome measures, coronal, sagittal and neurologic parameters) were evaluated in a multicentre, prospective cohort of patients with ASD. Multivariable analyses were carried out for idiopathic and degenerative patients separately with the dependent variable being "indication for surgery" and baseline parameters as independent variables. RESULTS: In total, 342 patients with degenerative ASD and 624 patients with idiopathic ASD were included in the multivariable models. In patients with degenerative ASD, the parameters associated with having an indication for surgery were greater self-rated disability on the Oswestry Disability Index [odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.07] and a lower thoracic kyphosis (OR 0.97 95% CI 0.95-0.99), whereas in patients with idiopathic ASD, it was lower (worse) SRS self-image scores (OR 0.45 95% CI 0.32-0.64), a higher value for the major Cobb angle (OR 1.03 95% CI 1.01-1.05), lower age (OR 0.96 95% CI 0.95-0.98), prior decompression (OR 3.76 95% CI 1.00-14.08), prior infiltration (OR 2.23 95% CI 1.12-4.43), and the presence of rotatory subluxation (OR 1.98 95% CI 1.11-3.54) and sagittal subluxation (OR 4.38 95% CI 1.61-11.95). CONCLUSION: Specific sets of variables were found to be associated with an indication for surgery in patients with ASD. These should be investigated in relation to patient outcomes for their potential to guide the future development of decision aids in the treatment of ASD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate factors that distinguish between patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) with and without an indication for surgery, irrespective of their final treatment. METHODS: Baseline variables (demographics, medical history, outcome measures, coronal, sagittal and neurologic parameters) were evaluated in a multicentre, prospective cohort of patients with ASD. Multivariable analyses were carried out for idiopathic and degenerative patients separately with the dependent variable being "indication for surgery" and baseline parameters as independent variables. RESULTS: In total, 342 patients with degenerative ASD and 624 patients with idiopathic ASD were included in the multivariable models. In patients with degenerative ASD, the parameters associated with having an indication for surgery were greater self-rated disability on the Oswestry Disability Index [odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.07] and a lower thoracic kyphosis (OR 0.97 95% CI 0.95-0.99), whereas in patients with idiopathic ASD, it was lower (worse) SRS self-image scores (OR 0.45 95% CI 0.32-0.64), a higher value for the major Cobb angle (OR 1.03 95% CI 1.01-1.05), lower age (OR 0.96 95% CI 0.95-0.98), prior decompression (OR 3.76 95% CI 1.00-14.08), prior infiltration (OR 2.23 95% CI 1.12-4.43), and the presence of rotatory subluxation (OR 1.98 95% CI 1.11-3.54) and sagittal subluxation (OR 4.38 95% CI 1.61-11.95). CONCLUSION: Specific sets of variables were found to be associated with an indication for surgery in patients with ASD. These should be investigated in relation to patient outcomes for their potential to guide the future development of decision aids in the treatment of ASD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Authors: Christine Baldus; Keith Bridwell; John Harrast; Christopher Shaffrey; Stephen Ondra; Lawrence Lenke; Frank Schwab; Steven Mardjetko; Steven Glassman; Charles Edwards; Thomas Lowe; William Horton; David Polly Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Steven D Glassman; Frank J Schwab; Keith H Bridwell; Stephen L Ondra; Sigurd Berven; Lawrence G Lenke Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-01-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: John K Birknes; Andrew P White; Todd J Albert; Christopher I Shaffrey; James S Harrop Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Javier Pizones; Mar Pérez Martin-Buitrago; Francisco Javier Sánchez Perez-Grueso; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid; Frank Kleinstück; Emre R Acaroglu; Ferran Pellisé Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Takashi Fujishiro; Louis Boissière; Derek Thomas Cawley; Daniel Larrieu; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre Acaroglu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Kenny Yat Hong Kwan; J Naresh-Babu; Wilco Jacobs; Marinus de Kleuver; David W Polly; Caglar Yilgor; Yabin Wu; Jong-Beom Park; Manabu Ito; Miranda L van Hooff Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 4.654