Literature DB >> 30847705

Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score : Part 1: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients below 40 years with adult spinal deformity.

Takashi Fujishiro1,2, Louis Boissière3, Derek Thomas Cawley3, Daniel Larrieu3, Olivier Gille3, Jean-Marc Vital3, Ferran Pellisé4, Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso5, Frank Kleinstück6, Emre Acaroglu7, Ahmet Alanay8, Ibrahim Obeid3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to develop and internally validate a simple scoring system: the adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgical decision-making (ASD-SDM) score, which is specific to the decision-making process for ASD patients aged below 40 years.
METHODS: A multicentre prospective ASD database was retrospectively reviewed. The scoring system was developed using data from a derivation cohort and was internally validated in a validation cohort. The accuracy of the ASD-SDM score was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: A total of 316 patients were randomly divided into derivation (253 patients, 80%) and validation (63 patients, 20%) cohorts. A 10-point scoring system was created from four variables: self-image score in the Scoliosis Research Society-22 score, coronal Cobb angle, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch, and relative spinopelvic alignment, and the surgical indication was graded into low (score 0-4), moderate (score 5-7), and high (score 8-10) surgical indication groups. In the validation cohort, the AUC for selecting surgical management according to the ASD-SDM score was 0.789 (SE 0.057, P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.655-0.880). The percentage of patients treated surgically were 21.1%, 55.0%, and 80.0% in the low, moderate, and high surgical indication groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The ASD-SDM score, to the best of our knowledge, is the first algorithm to guide the decision-making process for the ASD population and could be one of the indices for aiding the selection of treatment for ASD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Decision-making process; Scoliosis; Scoring system; Surgical indication

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30847705     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-05932-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

Review 1.  Adult scoliosis: surgical indications, operative management, complications, and outcomes.

Authors:  D S Bradford; B K Tay; S S Hu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The SRS classification for adult spinal deformity: building on the King/Moe and Lenke classification systems.

Authors:  Thomas Lowe; Sigurd H Berven; Frank J Schwab; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability.

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell; William Cats-Baril; John Harrast; Sigurd Berven; Steven Glassman; Jean-Pierre Farcy; William C Horton; Lawrence G Lenke; Christine Baldus; Terri Radake
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Nonsurgical resource utilization in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Sigurd Berven; John Kostuik; John R Dimar; William C Horton; Keith Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  The adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The selection of operative versus nonoperative treatment in patients with adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Frank J Schwab; Keith H Bridwell; Stephen L Ondra; Sigurd Berven; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients.

Authors:  T R Haher; J M Gorup; T M Shin; P Homel; A A Merola; D P Grogan; L Pugh; T G Lowe; M Murray
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery?

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell; Sigurd Berven; Steven Glassman; Christopher Hamill; William C Horton; Lawrence G Lenke; Frank Schwab; Christine Baldus; Michael Shainline
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Classification systems for adolescent and adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Charles Kuntz; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Studies in the modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity.

Authors:  Sigurd Berven; Vedat Deviren; Sibel Demir-Deviren; Serena S Hu; David S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Takashi Fujishiro; Louis Boissière; Derek Thomas Cawley; Daniel Larrieu; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre Acaroglu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Impact of radiologic variables on item responses of ODI, SRS22 and SF-36. in adult spinal deformity patients: differential item functioning (DIF) analysis results from a multi-center database.

Authors:  D C Kieser; S Yuksel; L Boissiere; C Yilgor; D T Cawley; K Hayashi; A Alanay; F S Kleinstueck; F Pellise; F J S Perez-Grueso; Vital Jean-Marc; A Bourghli; E R Acaroglu; I Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  Impact of COVID-19 on the pain and disability of patients with adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  D C Kieser; A Bourghli; D Larrieu; D T Cawley; K Hayashi; S Jakinapally; J Pizones; L Boissiere; I Obeid
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-03-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.