Literature DB >> 25657104

Patients with spinal deformity over the age of 75: a retrospective analysis of operative versus non-operative management.

Daniel M Sciubba1, Justin K Scheer2, Alp Yurter3, Justin S Smith4, Virginie Lafage5, Eric Klineberg6, Munish Gupta6, Robert Eastlack7, Gregory M Mundis7, Themistocles S Protopsaltis5, Donald Blaskiewicz8, Han Jo Kim9, Tyler Koski2, Khaled Kebaish10, Christopher I Shaffrey4, Shay Bess11, Robert A Hart12, Frank Schwab5, Christopher P Ames13.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of the present study was to compare the outcomes of operative and non-operative patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) over 75 years of age.
METHODS: A retrospective review of a multicenter prospective adult spinal deformity database was conducted examining patients with ASD over the age of 75 years. Demographics, comorbidities, operation-related variables, complications, radiographs, and Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures collected included Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form-36, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years later. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated and also compared.
RESULTS: 27 patients (12 operative, 15 non-operative) were studied. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between operative and non-operative patients for age, body mass-index, and comorbidities, but operative patients had worse baseline HRQOL than non-operative patients. Operative patients had a significant improvement in radiographic parameters in 2-year HRQOL, whereas non-operative patients did not (p > 0.05). Operative patients were significantly more likely to reach MCID (range 41.7-81.8 vs. 0-33.3 %, p < 0.05). In the surgical group, 9 (75 %) patients had at least 1 complication (24 total complications).
CONCLUSIONS: In the largest series to date comparing operative and non-operative management of adult spinal deformity in elderly patients greater than 75 years of age, reconstructive surgery provides significant improvements in pain and disability over a 2-year period. Furthermore, operative patients were more likely to reach MCID than non-operative patients. When counseling elderly patients with ASD, such data may be helpful in the decision-making process regarding treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  75 years; Adult spinal deformity; Complications; Elderly; HRQOL; MCID; Non-operative; Scoliosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25657104     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3759-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  36 in total

1.  Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Benjamin Ungar; Benjamin Blondel; Jacob Buchowski; Jeffrey Coe; Donald Deinlein; Christopher DeWald; Hossein Mehdian; Christopher Shaffrey; Clifford Tribus; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Shian Liu; Frank Schwab; Justin S Smith; Eric Klineberg; Christopher P Ames; Gregory Mundis; Richard Hostin; Khaled Kebaish; Vedat Deviren; Munish Gupta; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Robert A Hart; Shay Bess; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

3.  Predicting morbidity and mortality of lumbar spine arthrodesis in patients in their ninth decade.

Authors:  Christopher S Raffo; William C Lauerman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies.

Authors:  S Champain; K Benchikh; A Nogier; C Mazel; J De Guise; W Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  The adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Sigurd Berven; Steven Glassman; Christopher Hamill; William Horton; Stephen Ondra; Frank Schwab; Michael Shainline; Kai-Ming Fu; Keith Bridwell
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  The factors that play a role in the decision-making process of adult deformity patients.

Authors:  Murat Pekmezci; Sigurd H Berven; Serena S Hu; Vedat Deviren
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Three-column osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformity in adult patients 60 years old and older: outcome and complications.

Authors:  Hamid Hassanzadeh; Amit Jain; Mostafa H El Dafrawy; Michael C Ain; Addisu Mesfin; Richard L Skolasky; Khaled M Kebaish
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Pre- and post-operative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; Hubert Labelle; Jihane Rouissi; Arnaud Bodin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adults: an age-related analysis of outcome.

Authors:  Shinobu Takahashi; Joël Delécrin; Norbert Passuti
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2016.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2016.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Health-Related Quality of Life Scores Underestimate the Impact of Major Complications in Lumbar Degenerative Scoliosis Surgery.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Keith H Bridwell; Christopher I Shaffrey; Charles C Edwards; Jon D Lurie; Christine R Baldus; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2018-01

5.  Adult spine deformity surgery in elderly patients: are outcomes worse in patients 75 years and older?

Authors:  Zachary R Lovato; David G Deckey; Andrew S Chung; Dennis G Crandall; Jan Revella; Michael S Chang
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-07-21

6.  Adult Spinal Deformity Over 70 Years of Age: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Cem Karabulut; Selim Ayhan; Selcen Yuksel; Vugar Nabiyev; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Ferran Pellise; Ahmet Alanay; Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstuck; Ibrahim Obeid; Emre Acaroglu
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-08-31

7.  Inpatient morbidity after spinal deformity surgery in patients with movement disorders.

Authors:  Rafael De la Garza Ramos; C Rory Goodwin; Amit Jain; Daniel Martinez-Ramirez; Isaac O Karikari; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

8.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Primary and Revision Surgery Using a Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach in Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity and Sagittal Imbalance.

Authors:  Whoan Jeang Kim; Hyun Min Shin; Dae Geon Song; Jae Won Lee; Kun Young Park; Shann Haw Chang; Jin Hyun Bae; Won Sik Choy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-04-23

9.  Correlation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters on full-length spine radiographs compared with dedicated cervical radiographs.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Casey L Smith; John R Dimar; Steven D Glassman
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2016-04-07

10.  Risk Factors for Delirium After Spine Surgery in Extremely Elderly Patients Aged 80 Years or Older and Review of the Literature: Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with Ambition Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Shiro Imagama; Kei Ando; Naoki Ishiguro; Masaomi Yamashita; Yawara Eguchi; Morio Matsumoto; Ken Ishii; Tomohiro Hikata; Shoji Seki; Hidetomi Terai; Akinobu Suzuki; Koji Tamai; Masaaki Aramomi; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Atsushi Kimura; Hirokazu Inoue; Gen Inoue; Masayuki Miyagi; Wataru Saito; Kei Yamada; Michio Hongo; Yuji Matsuoka; Hidekazu Suzuki; Atsushi Nakano; Kazuyuki Watanabe; Hirotaka Chikuda; Junichi Ohya; Yasuchika Aoki; Masayuki Shimizu; Toshimasa Futatsugi; Keijiro Mukaiyama; Masaichi Hasegawa; Katsuhito Kiyasu; Haku Iizuka; Yoichi Iizuka; Ryoichi Kobayashi; Kotaro Nishida; Kenichiro Kakutani; Hideaki Nakajima; Hideki Murakami; Satoru Demura; Satoshi Kato; Katsuhito Yoshioka; Takashi Namikawa; Kei Watanabe; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Mitsunori Yoshimoto; Hiroyasu Fujiwara; Norihiro Nishida; Yasuaki Imajo; Masashi Yamazaki; Masataka Sakane; Tetsuya Abe; Kengo Fujii; Takashi Kaito; Takeo Furuya; Sumihisa Orita; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.