Literature DB >> 2791850

ERG electrode in pediatric patients: comparison of DTL fiber, PVA-gel, and non-corneal skin electrodes.

S G Coupland1, M Janaky.   

Abstract

Hard contact lens electrodes have been the type most frequently used in pediatric electroretinography but they are not well-tolerated by patients. The Dawson Trick Litzkow fiber electrode is better tolerated but it is fragile and difficult to sterilize. A new electrode made from anomalous polyvinyl alcohol gel is inexpensive, has stable electrical recording properties, and can be discarded after use. Dermal electrodes have been used for electroretinogram recording for some time; however, there are few reports that directly compare their performance against standard contact lens assemblies. We compared the DTL and the polyvinyl gel electrodes in the same group of subjects and investigated their recording characteristics along with non corneal skin electrodes placed on the infraorbital ridge. Signal-averaged electroretinogram were obtained under both scotopic and photopic stimulation conditions and the implicit time and amplitudes of the a- and b-waves were determined. Overall, dermal recordings generally had shorter implicit times and lower amplitudes than with the fiber or gel electrodes. The dermal electrodes were best tolerated and outlasted the corneal in repeated use. Since amplitude characteristics of the dermal electrodes were generally about 50% of that obtained with corneal electrodes, we feel that under standardized conditions they are acceptable for most clinical recording situations in infants and young children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2791850     DOI: 10.1007/bf00152771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  5 in total

1.  A speculum contact lens electrode for electroretinography.

Authors:  H M BURIAN; L ALLEN
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1954-08

2.  Effect of scleral recording location on ERG amplitude.

Authors:  S J Cringle; V A Alder; M J Brown; D Y Yu
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.424

3.  New disposable ERG electrode made of anomalous polyvinyl alcohol gel.

Authors:  Y Honda; N Naoi; S Y Kim; E Sakaue; M Nambu
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-07-15       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Electroretinography with noncorneal and corneal electrodes.

Authors:  J F Giltrow-Tyler; S J Crews; N Drasdo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Improved electrode for electroretinography.

Authors:  W W Dawson; G L Trick; C A Litzkow
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.799

  5 in total
  15 in total

1.  Normative data for a user-friendly paradigm for pattern electroretinogram recording.

Authors:  Vittorio Porciatti; Lori M Ventura
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  New noncorneal HK-loop electrode for clinical electroretinography.

Authors:  M Hawlina; B Konec
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Dark-adapted luminance-response functions with skin and corneal electrodes.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Pattern electroretinogram to detect glaucoma: comparing the PERGLA and the PERG Ratio protocols.

Authors:  Michael Bach; Anke Ramharter-Sereinig
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Multi-centre variability of ISCEV standard ERGs in two normal adults.

Authors:  R Hamilton; A Al Abdlseaed; J Healey; M M Neveu; L Brown; D Keating; V A McBain; D Sculfor; D A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  The DTL ERG electrode comes in different shapes and sizes: Are they all good?

Authors:  Jungeun Woo; Suna Jung; Mathieu Gauvin; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Recording the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram with the DTL electrode.

Authors:  P Lachapelle; J Benoit; J M Little; B Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes.

Authors:  Katharine E Mortlock; Alison M Binns; Yousef H Aldebasi; Rachel V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Electrophysiologic alterations in patients with optic nerve hypoplasia.

Authors:  M Janáky; A Deák; Z Pelle; G Benedek
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Flash electroretinography: normative values with surface skin electrodes and no pupil dilation using a standard stimulation protocol.

Authors:  Eleftherios S Papathanasiou; Savvas S Papacostas
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.