Literature DB >> 30929109

ISCEV extended protocol for the stimulus-response series for the dark-adapted full-field ERG b-wave.

Mary A Johnson1, Brett G Jeffrey2, André M V Messias3, Anthony G Robson4,5.   

Abstract

The International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) standard for full-field electroretinography (ERG) describes a minimum protocol for clinical testing but encourages more extensive testing where appropriate. This ISCEV extended protocol describes an extension of the ISCEV full-field ERG standard, in which methods to record and evaluate the growth of the dark-adapted (DA) ERG b-wave with increasing stimulus energy are described. The flashes span a range that includes the weakest flash required to generate a reliable DA ERG b-wave and that required to generate a maximal b-wave amplitude. The DA ERG b-wave stimulus-response series (also known historically as the "intensity-response" or "luminance-response" series) can more comprehensively characterize generalized rod system function than the ISCEV standard ERG protocol and may be of diagnostic or prognostic value in disorders that cause generalized rod system dysfunction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical standards; Electroretinogram (ERG); Intensity–response; International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV); Naka–Rushton; Retinopathy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30929109     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-019-09687-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  62 in total

1.  The luminance-response function of the dark-adapted human electroretinogram.

Authors:  N S Peachey; K R Alexander; G A Fishman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The relationship between rod perimetric thresholds and full-field rod ERGs in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  D G Birch; W K Herman; J M deFaller; D T Disbrow; E E Birch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Long-term observation of retinal electrical activity in dialyzed and renal transplantation patients.

Authors:  J Svĕrák; J Peregrin; D Hejcmanová; J Erben
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.094

4.  The photomyoclonic reflex: an artefact in the clinical electroretinogram.

Authors:  M A Johnson; R W Massof
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Rod visual fields in cone-rod degeneration. Comparisons to retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  D G Birch; J L Anderson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Comparison of ERGs recorded with skin and corneal-contact electrodes in normal children and adults.

Authors:  Keith Bradshaw; Ronald Hansen; Anne Fulton
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Electroretinographic findings in iris neovascularization due to acute central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  M A Johnson; T J McPhee
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06

8.  "Cone dystrophy with supernormal rod electroretinogram": a comprehensive genotype/phenotype study including fundus autofluorescence and extensive electrophysiology.

Authors:  Anthony G Robson; Andrew R Webster; Michel Michaelides; Susan M Downes; Jill A Cowing; David M Hunt; Anthony T Moore; Graham E Holder
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Electrophysiological evidence suggesting a seasonal modulation of retinal sensitivity in subsyndromal winter depression.

Authors:  Marc Hébert; Marie Dumont; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Rod ERGs in children with hereditary retinal degeneration.

Authors:  D G Birch; G E Fish
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  6 in total

1.  Use of extended protocols with nonstandard stimuli to characterize rod and cone contributions to the canine electroretinogram.

Authors:  Nate Pasmanter; Laurence M Occelli; András M Komáromy; Simon M Petersen-Jones
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Full-Field Electroretinography, Pupillometry, and Luminance Thresholds in X-Linked Retinoschisis.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park; Gerald A Fishman; Frederick T Collison
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2021 update).

Authors:  Michael B Hoffmann; Michael Bach; Mineo Kondo; Shiying Li; Sinead Walker; Karen Holopigian; Suresh Viswanathan; Anthony G Robson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2022 update).

Authors:  Anthony G Robson; Laura J Frishman; John Grigg; Ruth Hamilton; Brett G Jeffrey; Mineo Kondo; Shiying Li; Daphne L McCulloch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Prevalence of electronegative electroretinograms in a healthy adult cohort.

Authors:  Xiaofan Jiang; Taha Bhatti; Ambreen Tariq; Katie M Williams; Isabelle Chow; Talib Dar; Andrew R Webster; Pirro G Hysi; Christopher J Hammond; Omar A Mahroo
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.