Literature DB >> 19351984

The impact of treatment couch modelling on RapidArc.

Eugenio Vanetti1, Giorgia Nicolini, Alessandro Clivio, Antonella Fogliata, Luca Cozzi.   

Abstract

A planning and dosimetric study was carried out on a cohort of six CT datasets from patients treated for prostate cancer to assess the impact of couch modelling on the accuracy of dose calculation for the volumetric modulated arc technique RapidArc. For each patient, RapidArc plans were optimized using the couch while final dose calculation was performed with different conditions (thin, medium, thick and no couch). Analysis was performed in terms of dose volume histograms, dose difference histograms and 3D-gamma tests. Pre-treatment verification measurements were performed using the PTW-729 array in conjunction with the Octavius phantom (PTW, Freiburg); similarly, HU characterization of couch was performed with the same phantom and ion chamber measurements comparing calculations and experimental data. A set of Hounsfield Units (HU) valid for low and high energy and the entire couch length was found as internal structure HU = -960, surface shell HU = -700. Analysis of dose plans showed that differences larger than 1.5 Gy for a 70 Gy prescription might be observed on significant fractions of PTVs. Smaller differences are visible in the medium low-dose regions. Pre-treatment verification on composite delivery confirmed these observations and, at the same time, showed good accuracy of dose calculations in the presence of couch modelling compared to delivery in the same conditions (GAI ranging from 95% to 100%). Results confirmed the reliability of the geometrical model build in the planning system Eclipse, and (i) there is no measurable effect if the wrong segment of the couch is used in the calculations; (ii) there are significant discrepancies of potential clinical impact at the level of the target volumes if calculations are performed without couch and delivery is performed with couch, and (iii) the effect is particularly relevant at low energy (6 MV in this case) that is the configuration clinically used by most of the centres adopting technologies based on intensity-modulated arcs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19351984     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/N03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  25 in total

1.  Treatment planning and dosimetric comparison study on two different volumetric modulated arc therapy delivery techniques.

Authors:  S A Syam Kumar; Raghavendra Holla; Prabakar Sukumar; Sriram Padmanaban; Nagarajan Vivekanandan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-08-09

2.  The clinical impact of the couch top and rails on IMRT and arc therapy.

Authors:  Kiley B Pulliam; Rebecca M Howell; David Followill; Dershan Luo; R Allen White; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Dosimetry Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Rapid Arcand Fixed Field Dynamic IMRT for Local-Regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bao-Min Zheng; Xiao-Xia Dong; Hao Wu; Shu-Kui Han; Yan Sun
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  The effect of bladder contrast on dose calculation in volumetric modulated arc therapy planning in patients treated for postoperative prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tülay Ercan; Şefik İğdem; Gül Alço
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  A validation of carbon fiber imaging couch top modeling in two radiation therapy treatment planning systems: Philips Pinnacle3 and BrainLAB iPlan RT Dose.

Authors:  Christopher F Njeh; Jason Parker; Joseph Spurgin; Elizabeth Rhoe
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Two years experience with quality assurance protocol for patient related Rapid Arc treatment plan verification using a two dimensional ionization chamber array.

Authors:  Daniela Wagner; Hilke Vorwerk
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Increased beam attenuation and surface dose by different couch inserts of treatment tables used in megavoltage radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jan K H Seppälä; Jarmo A J Kulmala
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Characterization of dose impact on IMRT and VMAT from couch attenuation for two Varian couches.

Authors:  Heng Li; Andrew K Lee; Jennifer L Johnson; Ronald X Zhu; Rajat J Kudchadker
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Assessment and management of radiotherapy beam intersections with the treatment couch.

Authors:  Monique Van Prooijen; Thilakshan Kanesalingam; Mohammad K Islam; Robert K Heaton
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Shimohigashi; Fujio Araki; Hirofumi Tominaga; Junichi Sakata; Keiichi Kawasaki; Nagisa Kanetake; Yuki Iwashita; Saori Yoshimura; Tamami Kawakami; Terunobu Ishihara; Tomoko Okuda; Kasei Kogo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.