Literature DB >> 19350244

The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?

Ayano Akita1, Akihiro Tanimoto, Hiromitsu Jinno, Kaori Kameyama, Sachio Kuribayashi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of bilateral breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) in patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography and negative ultrasound findings. Fifty patients underwent MRI before stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVAB). MR findings were classified into five types for interpretation, and types 4 and 5 were considered malignant. SVAB revealed 13 carcinomas and 37 benign lesions. Malignant lesions were more frequently found in cases of positive MRI diagnoses than in negative MRI diagnoses (P < 0.001). Mammography had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 24% and an accuracy of 44%, whereas mammography plus MRI had a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 100% and an accuracy of 96%. In the evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications, bilateral breast MRI is of good diagnostic value and may alter the indications for SVAB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19350244     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1396-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  BI-RADS-MRI: a primer.

Authors:  Basak Erguvan-Dogan; Gary J Whitman; Anne C Kushwaha; Michael J Phelps; Peter J Dempsey
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value?

Authors:  J P Westerhof; U Fischer; J D Moritz; J W Oestmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani; Pietro Panizza; Chiara Del Frate; Franca Soldano; Miriam Isola; Francesco Sardanelli; Gian Marco Giuseppetti; Giovanni Simonetti; Vincenzo Lattanzio; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Three-dimensional MR imaging of mammographically detected suspicious microcalcifications.

Authors:  H Nakahara; K Namba; A Fukami; R Watanabe; Y Maeda; H Furusawa; T Matsu; F Akiyama; H Nakagawa; H Ifuku; M Nakahara; S Tamura
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.239

5.  Nonenhancing breast malignancies on MRI: sonographic and pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Sandeep Ghai; Derek Muradali; Karina Bukhanov; Supriya Kulkarni
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations.

Authors:  Ute Kettritz; Günter Morack; Thomas Decker
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2004-12-13       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  R Gilles; B Zafrani; J M Guinebretière; M Meunier; O Lucidarme; A A Tardivon; F Rochard; D Vanel; S Neuenschwander; R Arriagada
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value.

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; Melissa Joo-Young Lee; Jennifer B Kaplan; Linda R LaTrenta; Jennifer H Menell; Andrea F Abramson; Stephen M Dashnaw; Douglas J Ballon; D David Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in high-risk women.

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; Catherine L Benton; Andrea F Abramson; D David Dershaw
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ute Kettritz; Kerstin Rotter; Ingrid Schreer; Margarete Murauer; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Daniela Peter; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  9 in total

1.  The essence of the Japan Radiological Society/Japanese College of Radiology Imaging Guideline.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Yamashita; Sadayuki Murayama; Masahiro Okada; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Masako Kataoka; Yasushi Kaji; Keiko Imamura; Yasuo Takehara; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Kazuko Ohno; Kazuo Awai; Toshinori Hirai; Kazuyuki Kojima; Shuji Sakai; Naofumi Matsunaga; Takamichi Murakami; Kengo Yoshimitsu; Toshifumi Gabata; Kenji Matsuzaki; Eriko Tohno; Yasuhiro Kawahara; Takeo Nakayama; Shuichi Monzawa; Satoru Takahashi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.

Authors:  B L Stehouwer; L G Merckel; H M Verkooijen; N H G M Peters; R M Mann; K M Duvivier; W P Th M Mali; P H M Peeters; W B Veldhuis; M A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ana Hrkac Pustahija; Gordana Ivanac; Boris Brkljacic
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Accuracy assessment and characterization of x-ray coded aperture coherent scatter spectral imaging for breast cancer classification.

Authors:  Manu N Lakshmanan; Joel A Greenberg; Ehsan Samei; Anuj J Kapadia
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-07

5.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in probably benign (BI-RADS category 3) microcalcifications of the breast.

Authors:  Anna Linda; Chiara Zuiani; Viviana Londero; Eleonora Di Gaetano; Anna Dal Col; Rossano Girometti; Massimo Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Breast magnetic resonance imaging as a problem-solving modality in mammographic BI-RADS 3 lesions.

Authors:  M D Dorrius; R M Pijnappel; M C Jansen-van der Weide; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  Phantom-based study exploring the effects of different scatter correction approaches on the reconstructed images generated by contrast-enhanced stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Connor Puett; Christina Inscoe; Yueh Z Lee; Otto Zhou; Jianping Lu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-01

8.  Breast 3 T-MR imaging: indication for stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  Nobuko Yamamoto; Takeshi Yoshizako; Kazuaki Yoshikawa; Masayuki Itakura; Riruke Maruyama; Hajime Kitagaki
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-08-28

9.  A comparative study of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging and mammography on patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.

Authors:  Erni Li; Jing Li; Ying Song; Mei Xue; Chunwu Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.