Literature DB >> 24078055

3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.

B L Stehouwer, L G Merckel, H M Verkooijen, N H G M Peters, R M Mann, K M Duvivier, W P Th M Mali, P H M Peeters, W B Veldhuis, M A A J van den Bosch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of 3-Tesla (T) breast MRI in patients presenting with microcalcifications on mammography.
METHODS: Between January 2006 and May 2009, 123 patients with mammographically detected BI-RADS 3–5 microcalcifications underwent 3-T breast MRI before undergoing breast biopsy. All MRIs of the histopathologically confirmed index lesions were reviewed by two breast radiologists. The detection rate of invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was evaluated, as well as the added diagnostic value of MRI over mammography and breast ultrasound.
RESULTS: At pathology, 40/123 (33%) lesions proved malignant; 28 (70%) DCIS and 12 (30%) invasive carcinoma. Both observers detected all invasive malignancies at MRI, as well as 79% (observer 1) and 86% (observer 2) of in situ lesions. MRI in addition to conventional imaging led to a significant increase in area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve from 0.67 (95% CI 0.56–0.79) to 0.79 (95% CI 0.70–0.88, observer 1) and to 0.80 (95% CI 0.71–0.89, observer 2), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: 3-T breast MRI was shown to add significant value to conventional imaging in patients presenting with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. KEY POINTS: • 3-T MRI is increasingly used for breast imaging in clinical practice. • On 3-T breast MRI up to 86% of DCIS lesions are detected. • 3-T MRI increases the diagnostic value in patients with mammographically detected microcalcifications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24078055     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-3029-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification.

Authors:  M J Bagnall; A J Evans; A R Wilson; S E Pinder; H Denley; J G Geraghty; I O Ellis
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Texture detection of simulated microcalcification susceptibility effects in magnetic resonance imaging of breasts.

Authors:  D James; B D Clymer; P Schmalbrock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  The BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexicon.

Authors:  Virginia Molleran; Mary C Mahoney
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  Consensus review: A method of assessment of calcifications that appropriately undergo a six-month follow-up.

Authors:  Cherie M Kuzmiak; Ria Dancel; Etta Pisano; Donglin Zeng; Elodia Cole; Marcia A Koomen; Robert McLelland
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features.

Authors:  Sughra Raza; Monica Vallejo; Sona A Chikarmane; Robyn L Birdwell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value?

Authors:  J P Westerhof; U Fischer; J D Moritz; J W Oestmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET - randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  N H G M Peters; S van Esser; M A A J van den Bosch; R K Storm; P W Plaisier; T van Dalen; S C E Diepstraten; T Weits; P J Westenend; G Stapper; M A Fernandez-Gallardo; I H M Borel Rinkes; R van Hillegersberg; W P Th M Mali; P H M Peeters
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Takayuki Yamada; Naoko Mori; Mika Watanabe; Izo Kimijima; Tadayuki Okumoto; Kazumasa Seiji; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Adriana M J Bluekens; Roland Holland; Nico Karssemeijer; Mireille J M Broeders; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  7 in total

1.  US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ana Hrkac Pustahija; Gordana Ivanac; Boris Brkljacic
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 2.  Microcalcification on mammography: approaches to interpretation and biopsy.

Authors:  Louise Wilkinson; Val Thomas; Nisha Sharma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  DCE-MRI of the breast in a stand-alone setting outside a complementary strategy - results of the TK-study.

Authors:  Clemens G Kaiser; C Reich; M Dietzel; P A T Baltzer; J Krammer; K Wasser; S O Schoenberg; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A comparative study of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging and mammography on patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.

Authors:  Erni Li; Jing Li; Ying Song; Mei Xue; Chunwu Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Multiparameter MRI Model With DCE-MRI, DWI, and Synthetic MRI Improves the Diagnostic Performance of BI-RADS 4 Lesions.

Authors:  Shi Yun Sun; Yingying Ding; Zhuolin Li; Lisha Nie; Chengde Liao; Yifan Liu; Jia Zhang; Dongxue Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  MRI for the assessment of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications.

Authors:  Barbara Bennani-Baiti; Matthias Dietzel; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A New Application of Multimodality Radiomics Improves Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in Patients with Microcalcifications-Only in Mammography.

Authors:  Shujun Chen; Xiaojun Guan; Zhenyu Shu; Yongfeng Li; Wenming Cao; Fei Dong; Minming Zhang; Guoliang Shao; Feng Shao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.