Literature DB >> 9609890

MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value?

J P Westerhof1, U Fischer, J D Moritz, J W Oestmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the value of dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with mammographically detected suspicious microcalcifications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients (age range, 31-84 years; mean age, 56 years) with mammographically suspicious clustered microcalcifications underwent dynamic MR imaging of the breast before surgical biopsy. MR imaging was performed with a 1.5-T unit and a two-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence with a flip angle of 80 degrees. Thirty-two axial sections, 4 mm thick and without interval gaps, were acquired before and five times after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (dose, 0.1 mmol per kilogram of bodyweight). Histologic findings were used as the standard of reference. Any effect of MR imaging on surgical management was noted.
RESULTS: Biopsy findings verified five patients with T1 invasive carcinomas, 33 with ductal carcinomas in situ, 13 with proliferative fibrocystic disease, eight with nonproliferative fibrocystic disease, and four with sclerosing adenosis. Contrast material-enhanced dynamic MR imaging had a sensitivity of 45%, a specificity of 72%, and an overall accuracy of 56% in differentiating benign from malignant microcalcifications. All invasive tumors were detected with MR imaging. In no case was surgical management altered by MR imaging findings.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging of the breast is not reliable in differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease in mammographically suspicious clustered microcalcifications and has no effect on treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9609890     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.207.3.9609890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  The essence of the Japan Radiological Society/Japanese College of Radiology Imaging Guideline.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Yamashita; Sadayuki Murayama; Masahiro Okada; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Masako Kataoka; Yasushi Kaji; Keiko Imamura; Yasuo Takehara; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Kazuko Ohno; Kazuo Awai; Toshinori Hirai; Kazuyuki Kojima; Shuji Sakai; Naofumi Matsunaga; Takamichi Murakami; Kengo Yoshimitsu; Toshifumi Gabata; Kenji Matsuzaki; Eriko Tohno; Yasuhiro Kawahara; Takeo Nakayama; Shuichi Monzawa; Satoru Takahashi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Cluster analysis of signal-intensity time course in dynamic breast MRI: does unsupervised vector quantization help to evaluate small mammographic lesions?

Authors:  Gerda Leinsinger; Thomas Schlossbauer; Michael Scherr; Oliver Lange; Maximilian Reiser; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: correlations between high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology.

Authors:  Yoshihide Kanemaki; Yasuyuki Kurihara; Kyoko Okamoto; Yasuo Nakajima; Mamoru Fukuda; Ichiro Maeda; Futoshi Akiyama
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-01-25

4.  The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?

Authors:  Ayano Akita; Akihiro Tanimoto; Hiromitsu Jinno; Kaori Kameyama; Sachio Kuribayashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.

Authors:  B L Stehouwer; L G Merckel; H M Verkooijen; N H G M Peters; R M Mann; K M Duvivier; W P Th M Mali; P H M Peeters; W B Veldhuis; M A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard?

Authors:  F Sardanelli; L Bacigalupo; L Carbonaro; A Esseridou; G M Giuseppetti; P Panizza; V Lattanzio; A Del Maschio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  P Viehweg; D Lampe; J Buchmann; S H Heywang-Köbrunner
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI.

Authors:  N Morakkabati-Spitz; C Leutner; H Schild; F Traeber; C Kuhl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The adjacent vessel sign on breast MRI: new data and a subgroup analysis for 1,084 histologically verified cases.

Authors:  Matthias Dietzel; Pascal A T Baltzer; Tibor Vag; Aimee Herzog; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: X-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model.

Authors:  Sanaz A Jansen; Tatjana Paunesku; Xiaobing Fan; Gayle E Woloschak; Stefan Vogt; Suzanne D Conzen; Thomas Krausz; Gillian M Newstead; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.