Literature DB >> 16037524

Nonenhancing breast malignancies on MRI: sonographic and pathologic correlation.

Sandeep Ghai1, Derek Muradali, Karina Bukhanov, Supriya Kulkarni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the sonographic appearance and histopathologic basis of those malignancies of the breast that show non-enhancement on MRI.
CONCLUSION: Breast malignancies with suspicious features on sonography may not be detected on MRI due to non-enhancement of the lesions. In such cases, we suggest the use of tissue sampling to differentiate between benign and malignant breast lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16037524     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.185.2.01850481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?

Authors:  Ayano Akita; Akihiro Tanimoto; Hiromitsu Jinno; Kaori Kameyama; Sachio Kuribayashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  VPAC1 receptors for imaging breast cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Mathew L Thakur; Kaijun Zhang; Adam Berger; Barbara Cavanaugh; Sung Kim; Chaitra Channappa; Andrea J Frangos; Eric Wickstrom; Charles M Intenzo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Computerized breast mass detection using multi-scale Hessian-based analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Yan-Hao Huang; Yeun-Chung Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP) receptor specific peptide analogues for PET imaging of breast cancer: In vitro/in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Kaijun Zhang; Mohan R Aruva; Nylla Shanthly; Christopher A Cardi; Chirag A Patel; Satish Rattan; Gregory Cesarone; Eric Wickstrom; Mathew L Thakur
Journal:  Regul Pept       Date:  2007-07-06

5.  Rare breast neoplasms: is there any peculiar feature on magnetic resonance mammography?

Authors:  A Linda; V Londero; F Mazzarella; C Zuiani; M Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  MR Imaging Features of Tubular Carcinoma: Preliminary Experience in Twelve Masses.

Authors:  Ravza Yılmaz; Zuhal Bayramoğlu; Selman Emirikçi; Semen Önder; Artur Salmaslıoğlu; Memduh Dursun; Gülden Acunaş; Vahit Özmen
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-01-01

7.  Breast 3 T-MR imaging: indication for stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  Nobuko Yamamoto; Takeshi Yoshizako; Kazuaki Yoshikawa; Masayuki Itakura; Riruke Maruyama; Hajime Kitagaki
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-08-28

8.  Which clinical, radiological, histological, and molecular parameters are associated with the absence of enhancement of known breast cancers with Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM)?

Authors:  Giulia Bicchierai; Francesco Amato; Bianca Vanzi; Diego De Benedetto; Cecilia Boeri; Ermanno Vanzi; Federica Di Naro; Simonetta Bianchi; Donatello Cirone; Diletta Cozzi; Vittorio Miele; Jacopo Nori
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Large Non-enhancing Breast Cancer on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Case Report.

Authors:  Johannes Peters; Wei Che Tsai; Gudrun Peters
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-03-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.