Literature DB >> 19298961

Activating event knowledge.

Mary Hare1, Michael Jones, Caroline Thomson, Sarah Kelly, Ken McRae.   

Abstract

An increasing number of results in sentence and discourse processing demonstrate that comprehension relies on rich pragmatic knowledge about real-world events, and that incoming words incrementally activate such knowledge. If so, then even outside of any larger context, nouns should activate knowledge of the generalized events that they denote or typically play a role in. We used short stimulus onset asynchrony priming to demonstrate that (1) event nouns prime people (sale-shopper) and objects (trip-luggage) commonly found at those events; (2) location nouns prime people/animals (hospital-doctor) and objects (barn-hay) commonly found at those locations; and (3) instrument nouns prime things on which those instruments are commonly used (key-door), but not the types of people who tend to use them (hose-gardener). The priming effects are not due to normative word association. On our account, facilitation results from event knowledge relating primes and targets. This has much in common with computational models like LSA or BEAGLE in which one word primes another if they frequently occur in similar contexts. LSA predicts priming for all six experiments, whereas BEAGLE correctly predicted that priming should not occur for the instrument-people relation but should occur for the other five. We conclude that event-based relations are encoded in semantic memory and computed as part of word meaning, and have a strong influence on language comprehension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19298961      PMCID: PMC2831639          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  29 in total

1.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.

Authors:  Jos J A Van Berkum; Colin M Brown; Pienie Zwitserlood; Valesca Kooijman; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon.

Authors:  Michael N Jones; Douglas J K Mewhort
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Contextual override of pragmatic anomalies: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Ruth Filik
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-23

4.  Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James S Magnuson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task.

Authors:  I Fischler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-05

6.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.

Authors:  G T Altmann; Y Kamide
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

7.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; A D Well
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Strategic factors in a lexical-decision task: evidence for automatic and attention-driven processes.

Authors:  K den Heyer; K Briand; G L Dannenbring
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-07

9.  Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400.

Authors:  J J van Berkum; P Hagoort; C M Brown
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns.

Authors:  Ken McRae; Mary Hare; Jeffrey L Elman; Todd Ferretti
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-10
View more
  33 in total

1.  Effects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments.

Authors:  Klinton Bicknell; Jeffrey L Elman; Mary Hare; Ken McRae; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain.

Authors:  Myrna F Schwartz; Daniel Y Kimberg; Grant M Walker; Adelyn Brecher; Olufunsho K Faseyitan; Gary S Dell; Daniel Mirman; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Jon-Frederick Landrigan; Allison E Britt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts.

Authors:  Solène Kalénine; Daniel Mirman; Erica L Middleton; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  In defense of abstract conceptual representations.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

6.  Individual differences in the strength of taxonomic versus thematic relations.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Kristen M Graziano
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-12-26

7.  A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Trevor Brothers; Edward W Wlotko
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Hemispheric asymmetry in event knowledge activation during incremental language comprehension: A visual half-field ERP study.

Authors:  Ross Metusalem; Marta Kutas; Thomas P Urbach; Jeffrey L Elman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Semantic memory for objects, actions, and events: A novel test of event-related conceptual semantic knowledge.

Authors:  Haley C Dresang; Michael Walsh Dickey; Tessa C Warren
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Ross Metusalem; Marta Kutas; Thomas P Urbach; Mary Hare; Ken McRae; Jeffrey L Elman
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.