Literature DB >> 19292617

Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry, and fracture incidence in the women's health initiative-observational study.

Thomas J Beck1, Moira A Petit, Guanglin Wu, Meryl S LeBoff, Jane A Cauley, Zhao Chen.   

Abstract

Heavier individuals have higher hip BMD and more robust femur geometry, but it is unclear whether values vary in proportion with body weight in obesity. We studied the variation of hip BMD and geometry across categories of body mass index (BMI) in a subset of postmenopausal non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Cohort (WHI-OS). The implications on fracture incidence were studied among NHWs in the entire WHI-OS. Baseline DXA scans of hip and total body from 4642 NHW women were divided into BMI (kg/m(2)) categories: underweight (<18.5), healthy weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9), and mild (30-34.9), moderate (35-39.9), and extreme obesity (>40). Femur BMD and indices of bone axial (cross-sectional area [CSA]) and bending strength (section modulus [SM]) were extracted from DXA scans using the hip structure analysis (HSA) method and compared among BMI categories after adjustment for height, age, hormone use, diabetes, activity level, femur neck-shaft angle, and neck length. The association between BMI and incident fracture was studied in 78,013 NHWs from the entire WHI-OS over 8.5 +/- 2.6 (SD) yr of follow-up. Fracture incidence (cases/1000 person-years) was compared among BMI categories for hip alone, central body (hip, pelvis, spine, ribs, and shoulder girdle), upper extremity (humerus and distal), and lower extremity (femur shaft and distal but not hip). Femur BMD, CSA, and SM were larger in women with higher BMI, but values scaled in proportion to lean and not to fat or total body mass. Women with highest BMI reported more falls in the 12 mo before enrollment, more prevalent fractures, and had lower measures of physical activity and function. Incidence of hip fractures and all central body fractures declined with BMI. Lower extremity fractures distal to the hip trended upward, and upper extremity incidence was independent of BMI. BMD, CSA, and SM vary in proportion to total body lean mass, supporting the view that bones adapt to prevalent muscle loads. Because lean mass is a progressively smaller fraction of total mass in obesity, femur BMD, CSA, and SM decline relative to body weight in higher BMI categories. Traumatic forces increase with body weight, but fracture rates at the hip and central body were less frequent with increasing BMI, possibly because of greater soft tissue padding. There was no evident protective effect in fracture rates at less padded distal extremity sites. Upper extremity fractures showed no variation with BMI, and lower extremity fracture rates were higher only in the overweight (BMI = 25-29.9 kg/m(2)).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19292617      PMCID: PMC2718796          DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.090307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  32 in total

1.  Body size, body shape, and long bone strength in modern humans.

Authors:  C B Ruff
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.895

2.  Non-invasive measurement of long bone cross-sectional moment of inertia by photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  R B Martin; D B Burr
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Structural adaptation to changing skeletal load in the progression toward hip fragility: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  T J Beck; T L Oreskovic; K L Stone; C B Ruff; K Ensrud; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density: the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; John Robbins; Zhao Chen; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca D Jackson; Andrea Z LaCroix; Meryl LeBoff; Cora E Lewis; Joan McGowan; Joan Neuner; Mary Pettinger; Marcia L Stefanick; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Femoral bone structural geometry adapts to mechanical loading and is influenced by sex steroids: the Penn State Young Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Moira A Petit; Thomas J Beck; Hung-Mo Lin; Christy Bentley; Richard S Legro; Tom Lloyd
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  The prevalence of obesity.

Authors:  Holly R Wyatt
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.907

7.  Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Stephen Kaptoge; Thomas J Beck; Jonathan Reeve; Katie L Stone; Teresa A Hillier; Jane A Cauley; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Patient-specific DXA bone mineral density inaccuracies: quantitative effects of nonuniform extraosseous fat distributions.

Authors:  H H Bolotin; H Sievänen; J L Grashuis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Structural and biomechanical basis of sexual dimorphism in femoral neck fragility has its origins in growth and aging.

Authors:  Yunbo Duan; Thomas J Beck; Xiao-Fang Wang; Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Validity of self-report for fractures among a multiethnic cohort of postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative observational study and clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Charles Kooperberg; Mary B Pettinger; Tamsen Bassford; Jane A Cauley; Andrea Z LaCroix; Cora E Lewis; Simon Kipersztok; Carolyn Borne; Rebecca D Jackson
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  108 in total

1.  Obesity alters cortical and trabecular bone density and geometry in women.

Authors:  D Sukumar; Y Schlussel; C S Riedt; C Gordon; T Stahl; S A Shapses
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bone and fat relationships in postadolescent black females: a pQCT study.

Authors:  N K Pollock; E M Laing; M W Hamrick; C A Baile; D B Hall; R D Lewis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Femoral neck geometry in overweight and normal weight adolescent girls.

Authors:  Rawad El Hage; Elie Moussa; Christophe Jacob
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Bone geometry and strength adaptations to physical constraints inherent in different sports: comparison between elite female soccer players and swimmers.

Authors:  Beatrice Ferry; Martine Duclos; Lauren Burt; Perrine Therre; Franck Le Gall; Christelle Jaffré; Daniel Courteix
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Body composition and skeletal health: too heavy? Too thin?

Authors:  Alexander Faje; Anne Klibanski
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Hip geometry in diabetic women: implications for fracture risk.

Authors:  Rajesh Garg; Zhao Chen; Thomas Beck; Jane A Cauley; Guanglin Wu; Dorothy Nelson; Beth Lewis; Andrea LaCroix; Meryl S LeBoff
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 7.  Examining the link between bariatric surgery, bone loss, and osteoporosis: a review of bone density studies.

Authors:  Lesley M Scibora; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Henry Buchwald; Moira A Petit
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women 50 to 64 years old: comparison of US Preventive Services Task Force strategy and two traditional strategies in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall; Joseph Larson; Margaret L Gourlay; Meghan G Donaldson; Andrea LaCroix; Jane A Cauley; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Margery L Gass; John A Robbins; Nelson B Watts; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Overweight/obesity and underweight are both risk factors for osteoporotic fractures at different sites in Japanese postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Tanaka; T Kuroda; M Saito; M Shiraki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  C-reactive protein, bone strength, and nine-year fracture risk: data from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Shinya Ishii; Jane A Cauley; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Michelle E Danielson; Yasuyoshi Ouchi; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.