Literature DB >> 14584886

Structural and biomechanical basis of sexual dimorphism in femoral neck fragility has its origins in growth and aging.

Yunbo Duan1, Thomas J Beck, Xiao-Fang Wang, Ego Seeman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The structural basis for sex differences in femoral neck (FN) fragility was studied in 1196 subjects and 307 patients with hip fracture. The absolute and relative patterns of modeling and remodeling on the periosteal and endocortical envelopes during growth and aging produce changes in FN geometry and structure that results in FN fragility in both sexes and sexual dimorphism in hip fracture risk in old age.
INTRODUCTION: Femoral neck (FN) fragility in old age is usually attributed to age-related bone loss, while the sex differences in hip fracture rate are attributed to less bone loss in men than in women. The purpose of this study was to define the structural and biomechanical basis underlying the increase in FN fragility in elderly men and women and the structural basis of sex differences in hip fracture incidence in old age.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured FN dimensions and areal bone mineral density in 1196 healthy subjects (801 females) 18-92 years of age and 307 patients (180 females) with hip fracture using DXA. We then used the DXA-derived FN areal bone mineral density (BMD) and measured periosteal diameter to estimate endocortical diameter, cortical thickness, section modulus (a measure of bending strength), and buckling ratio (indices for structural stability).
RESULTS: Neither FN cortical thickness nor volumetric density differed in young adult women and men after height and weight adjustment. The sex differences in geometry were confined to the further displacement of the cortex from the FN neutral axis in young men, which produced 13.4% greater bending strength than in young women. Aging amplified this geometric difference; widening of the periosteal and endocortical diameters continued in both sexes but was greater in men, shifting the cortex even further from the neutral axis maintaining bending strength in men, not in women. In both sexes, less age-related periosteal than endocortical widening produced cortical thinning increasing the risk for structural failure by local buckling of the enlarged thin walled FN. Relative to age-matched controls, women and men with hip fractures had reduced cortical thickness, but FN periosteal diameter was increased in women and reduced in men, differences are likely to be originated in growth.
CONCLUSIONS: The absolute and relative patterns of modeling and remodeling on the periosteal and endocortical envelopes during growth and aging produce changes in FN diameters, cortical thickness, and geometry that results in FN fragility in both sexes and sexual dimorphism in hip fracture risk in old age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14584886     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.10.1766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  91 in total

1.  Sexual dimorphism of femoral neck cross-sectional bone geometry in athletes and non-athletes: a hip structural analysis study.

Authors:  Karen Hind; Lisa Gannon; Emma Whatley; Carlton Cooke
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Whole bone mechanics and bone quality.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Cole; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Type 2 diabetes and bone fractures.

Authors:  Kendall F Moseley
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  Comparisons of trabecular and cortical bone in late adolescent black and white females.

Authors:  Norman K Pollock; Emma M Laing; Ruth G Taylor; Clifton A Baile; Mark W Hamrick; Daniel B Hall; Richard D Lewis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Dynamic bone quality: a noninvasive measure of bone's biomechanical property in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Amit Bhattacharya; Nelson B Watts; Kermit Davis; Susan Kotowski; Rakesh Shukla; Alok Kumar Dwivedi; Robert Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 6.  Functional interactions among morphologic and tissue quality traits define bone quality.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Femoral Neck External Size but not aBMD Predicts Structural and Mass Changes for Women Transitioning Through Menopause.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Andrew Kozminski; Erin Mr Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht; Robert W Goulet; Sioban D Harlow; Jane A Cauley; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierrez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Tibia and radius bone geometry and volumetric density in obese compared to non-obese adolescents.

Authors:  Mary B Leonard; Babette S Zemel; Brian H Wrotniak; Sarah B Klieger; Justine Shults; Virginia A Stallings; Nicolas Stettler
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry, and fracture incidence in the women's health initiative-observational study.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck; Moira A Petit; Guanglin Wu; Meryl S LeBoff; Jane A Cauley; Zhao Chen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Hormone therapy improves femur geometry among ethnically diverse postmenopausal participants in the Women's Health Initiative hormone intervention trials.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Thomas J Beck; Jane A Cauley; Cora E Lewis; Andrea LaCroix; Tamsen Bassford; Guanglin Wu; Duane Sherrill; Scott Going
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.