Literature DB >> 20364283

Femoral neck geometry in overweight and normal weight adolescent girls.

Rawad El Hage1, Elie Moussa, Christophe Jacob.   

Abstract

Being overweight is associated with increased bone mineral content, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone strength in adults. However, the effect of being overweight on bone strength during adolescence is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to compare femoral neck geometry in overweight and normal weight adolescent girls. This study included 22 overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m(2)) adolescent girls (15.4 +/- 2.4 years old) and 20 maturation-matched (15.2 +/- 1.9 years old) controls (BMI < 25 kg/m(2)). Body composition and BMD were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). To evaluate bone geometry, DXA scans were analyzed at the femoral neck by the hip structure analysis (HSA) program. Cross-sectional area (CSA), an index of axial compression strength, section modulus (Z), an index of bending strength, cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), cortical thickness (CT), and buckling ratio (BR) were measured from bone mass profiles. Lean mass, body weight, fat mass, and BMI were higher in overweight girls compared to controls (P < 0.001). CSA, Z, and CSMI were higher in overweight girls compared to controls (P < 0.05; P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). CT and BR were not significantly different between the two groups. After adjustment for body weight, lean mass, or fat mass, using a one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), there were no differences between the two groups (overweight and controls) regarding the HSA variables (CSA, Z, CSMI, CT, and BR). In conclusion, this study suggests that overweight adolescent girls have greater indices of bone axial and bending strength in comparison to controls at the femoral neck.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20364283     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-010-0176-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  29 in total

Review 1.  Measuring the structural strength of bones with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: principles, technical limitations, and future possibilities.

Authors:  Thomas Beck
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Proximal femur bone geometry is appropriately adapted to lean mass in overweight children and adolescents.

Authors:  Moira A Petit; Thomas J Beck; Justine Shults; Babette S Zemel; Bethany J Foster; Mary B Leonard
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  HSA: beyond BMD with DXA.

Authors:  Sydney Lou Bonnick
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Bone mineral density in childhood obesity.

Authors:  A Hasanoğlu; A Bideci; P Cinaz; L Tümer; S Unal
Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.634

5.  Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry, and fracture incidence in the women's health initiative-observational study.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck; Moira A Petit; Guanglin Wu; Meryl S LeBoff; Jane A Cauley; Zhao Chen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  A high body mass index protects against femoral neck osteoporosis in healthy elderly subjects.

Authors:  Gladys Barrera; Daniel Bunout; Vivien Gattás; María Pía de la Maza; Laura Leiva; Sandra Hirsch
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.008

7.  Sexual dimorphism of the femoral neck during the adolescent growth spurt: a structural analysis.

Authors:  Mark R Forwood; Donald A Bailey; Thomas J Beck; Robert L Mirwald; Adam D G Baxter-Jones; Kirsti Uusi-Rasi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Bone mineral density in prepubertal obese and control children: relation to body weight, lean mass, and fat mass.

Authors:  Emilie Rocher; Christine Chappard; Christelle Jaffre; Claude-Laurent Benhamou; Daniel Courteix
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Physical activity and femoral neck bone strength during childhood: the Iowa Bone Development Study.

Authors:  Kathleen F Janz; Julie M Eichenberger Gilmore; Steven M Levy; Elena M Letuchy; Trudy L Burns; Thomas J Beck
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Bone mineral mass in overweight and obese children: diminished or enhanced?

Authors:  K J Ellis; R J Shypailo; W W Wong; S A Abrams
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.280

View more
  5 in total

1.  Hip bone strength indices in overweight and control adolescent boys.

Authors:  Zaher El Hage; Denis Theunynck; Christophe Jacob; Elie Moussa; Rafic Baddoura; Pierre Kamlé; Rawad El Hage
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Association between weight changes and changes in hip geometric indices in the Japanese female population during 10-year follow-up: Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.

Authors:  N DongMei; M Iki; J Tamaki; Y Sato; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Geometric indices of hip bone strength in obese, overweight, and normal-weight adolescent boys.

Authors:  R El Hage
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Lean mass predicts hip geometry in men and women with non-insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Kendall F Moseley; Devon A Dobrosielski; Kerry J Stewart; Deborah E Sellmeyer; Suzanne M Jan De Beur
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Bone mineral density in healthy female adolescents according to age, bone age and pubertal breast stage.

Authors:  Maria Regina Moretto de Oliveria; Carla Cristiane da Silva; Cilmery Suemi Kurokawa; Cristina Maria Teixeira Fortes; Renata Campos Capela; Altamir Santos Teixeira; José Carlos Dalmas; Tamara Beres Lederer Goldberg
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-09-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.