Literature DB >> 19277785

Observer study for evaluating potential utility of a super-high-resolution LCD in the detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms.

Junji Shiraishi1, Hiroyuki Abe, Katsuhiro Ichikawa, Robert A Schmidt, Kunio Doi.   

Abstract

We evaluated the potential utility of a newly developed liquid-crystal display (LCD), which used an independent sub-pixel drive (ISD) technique for increasing the spatial resolution of a standard LCD three times in one direction, by use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and a two-alternative-forced-choice (2AFC) method to determine improvement in radiologists' accuracy in the detection of clustered microcalcifications (MCLs) on digital mammograms. We used a standard LCD without and with the ISD technique, which can increase the spatial resolution of the LCD three times in one direction from three mega- to nine megapixels without changes in the size of the display. We used 60 single views of digital mammograms (30 with and 30 without clustered MCLs) for ROC studies and 60 regions of interest (ROIs) with clustered MCLs for 2AFC studies. In the ROC study, seven radiologists attempted to detect clustered MCLs without and with the ISD on the same LCD. In the 2AFC study, the same observer group compared the visibility of MCLs by use of the LCD without and with the ISD. Our institutional review board approved the use of this database and the participation of radiologists in this study. The accuracy in detecting clustered MCLs in the ROC study was improved by use of the LCD with the ISD, but the improvement was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). However, the superiority of the LCD with the ISD was demonstrated as significant (p < 0.001) in the 2AFC study. An LCD with ISD can improve the visibility of clustered MCLs when high-resolution digital mammograms are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19277785      PMCID: PMC3043779          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-009-9192-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  17 in total

1.  "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Elodia B Cole; Emily O Kistner; Keith E Muller; Bradley M Hemminger; Mary L Brown; R Eugene Johnston; Cherie M Kuzmiak; M Patricia Braeuning; Rita I Freimanis; Mary Scott Soo; J A Baker; Ruth Walsh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Visual detection and localization of radiographic images.

Authors:  S J Starr; C E Metz; L B Lusted; D J Goodenough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Computer-aided diagnosis to distinguish benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules on radiographs: ROC analysis of radiologists' performance--initial experience.

Authors:  Junji Shiraishi; Hiroyuki Abe; Roger Engelmann; Masahito Aoyama; Heber MacMahon; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

6.  Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography.

Authors:  Robert S Saunders; Ehsan Samei; Jay Baker; David Delong; Mary Scott Soo; Ruth Walsh; Etta Pisano; Cherie M Kuzmiak; Dag Pavic
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Ananth Poolla; Michael J Ulissey; John M Lewin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings.

Authors:  Chisako Muramatsu; Qiang Li; Robert A Schmidt; Junji Shiraishi; Kenji Suzuki; Gillian M Newstead; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Observer performance in detecting multiple radiographic signals. Prediction and analysis using a generalized ROC approach.

Authors:  C E Metz; S J Starr; L B Lusted
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads.

Authors:  L N Loo; K Doi; C E Metz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effect of greyscale liquid crystal displays of different resolutions on observer performance during detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  J Yin; Q Guo; W Zhang; H Su; J Zhang; Y Yue; C Ding; A Lin; Y Wang; H Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Preliminary investigation of the clinical usefulness of super-high-resolution LCDs with 9 and 15 mega-sub-pixels: observation studies with phantoms.

Authors:  Aya Nishimura; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Yuko Mochiya; Ayumi Morishita; Hiroko Kawashima; Tomoyuki Yamamoto; Mikio Hasegawa; Naofumi Kimura; Shigeru Sanada
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2009-12-25

3.  Medical display application for degraded image sharpness restoration based on the modulation transfer function: initial assessment for a five-megapixel mammography display monitor.

Authors:  Shogo Tokurei; Yoichiro Ikushima; Kazuki Takegami; Munemasa Okada; Junji Morishita
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-05-17

4.  Blurred digital mammography images: an analysis of technical recall and observer detection performance.

Authors:  Wang Kei Ma; Rita Borgen; Judith Kelly; Sara Millington; Beverley Hilton; Rob Aspin; Carla Lança; Peter Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Multi-reader multi-case studies using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve as a measure of diagnostic accuracy: systematic review with a focus on quality of data reporting.

Authors:  Thaworn Dendumrongsup; Andrew A Plumb; Steve Halligan; Thomas R Fanshawe; Douglas G Altman; Susan Mallett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.