Literature DB >> 20821105

Preliminary investigation of the clinical usefulness of super-high-resolution LCDs with 9 and 15 mega-sub-pixels: observation studies with phantoms.

Aya Nishimura1, Katsuhiro Ichikawa, Yuko Mochiya, Ayumi Morishita, Hiroko Kawashima, Tomoyuki Yamamoto, Mikio Hasegawa, Naofumi Kimura, Shigeru Sanada.   

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the preliminary clinical efficacy of soft-copy reading of digital mammography, for a 15-mega-sub-pixel (MsP) and a 9-MsP super-high-resolution liquid-crystal display (SHR-LCD) by use of an independent sub-pixel driving technology. We performed three kinds of phantom observation studies by six radiological technologists. Detectability of a contrast-detail phantom and simulated small objects (SSOs) resembling microcalcifications (MCLs), and shape discrimination ability of SSOs with round and square shapes, were examined and compared with a 5-MP conventional LCD (5-MP LCD). In each study, four types of display magnification ratio were used. The detectability and the shape discrimination ability of the 15-MsP SHR-LCD were highest among the three LCDs of most of the display magnification ratios. The 9-MsP SHR-LCD indicated a higher or equal performance as compared with the 5-MP LCD in the SSO detection and shape studies. The results of our study demonstrated that the SHR-LCDs had good potential to detect MCLs and to evaluate the shape in high-resolution digital mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20821105     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-009-0079-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  13 in total

1.  Clustering of breast microcalcifications: revisited.

Authors:  J M Park; H K Choi; S J Bae; M S Lee; S H Ahn; G Gong
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Noise in flat-panel displays with subpixel structure.

Authors:  Aldo Badano; Robert M Gagne; Robert J Jennings; Sarah E Drilling; Benjamin R Imhoff; Edward Muka
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Contrast-detail phantom scoring methodology.

Authors:  Jerry A Thomas; Kish Chakrabarti; Richard Kaczmarek; Alexander Romanyukha
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Aldo Badano; Dev Chakraborty; Ken Compton; Craig Cornelius; Kevin Corrigan; Michael J Flynn; Bradley Hemminger; Nick Hangiandreou; Jeffrey Johnson; Donna M Moxley-Stevens; William Pavlicek; Hans Roehrig; Lois Rutz; Jeffrey Shepard; Robert A Uzenoff; Jihong Wang; Charles E Willis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.

Authors:  Klaus Bacher; Peter Smeets; An De Hauwere; Tony Voet; Philippe Duyck; Koenraad Verstraete; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography.

Authors:  Robert S Saunders; Ehsan Samei; Jay Baker; David Delong; Mary Scott Soo; Ruth Walsh; Etta Pisano; Cherie M Kuzmiak; Dag Pavic
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Ananth Poolla; Michael J Ulissey; John M Lewin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Observer study for evaluating potential utility of a super-high-resolution LCD in the detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms.

Authors:  Junji Shiraishi; Hiroyuki Abe; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Robert A Schmidt; Kunio Doi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study.

Authors:  Takeshi Kamitani; Hidetake Yabuuchi; Hiroyasu Soeda; Yoshio Matsuo; Takashi Okafuji; Shuji Sakai; Akio Furuya; Masamitsu Hatakenaka; Nobuhide Ishii; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Diagnostic performance of detecting breast cancer on computed radiographic (CR) mammograms: comparison of hard copy film, 3-megapixel liquid-crystal-display (LCD) monitor and 5-megapixel LCD monitor.

Authors:  Takayuki Yamada; Akihiko Suzuki; Nachiko Uchiyama; Noriaki Ohuchi; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

1.  Visual evaluation and usefulness of medical high-resolution liquid-crystal displays with use of independent sub-pixel driving technology.

Authors:  Seigo Yamada; Yoshiharu Hirata; Rie Ishii; Toshihide Ogawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-02-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.