Literature DB >> 14685097

A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Chris Collins1, Donal Maguire, Adrian Ireland, Edward Fitzgerald, Gerald C O'Sullivan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define the incidence of problematic common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In patients selected for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the true incidence of potentially problematic common bile duct calculi and their natural history has not been determined. We evaluated the incidence and early natural history of common bile duct calculi in all patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative and delayed postoperative cholangiography.
METHODS: Operative cholangiography was attempted in all patients. In those patients in whom a filling defect was noted in the bile duct, the fine bore cholangiogram catheter was left securely clipped in the cystic duct for repeated cholangiography at 48 hours and at approximately 6 weeks postoperatively.
RESULTS: Operative cholangiography was attempted in 997 consecutive patients and was accomplished in 962 patients (96%). Forty-six patients (4.6%) had at least one filling defect. Twelve of these had a normal cholangiogram at 48 hours (26% possible false-positive operative cholangiogram) and a further 12 at 6 weeks (26% spontaneous passage of calculi). Spontaneous passage was not determined by either the number or size of calculi or by the diameter of the bile duct. Only 22 patients (2.2% of total population) had persistent common bile duct calculi at 6 weeks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and retrieved by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
CONCLUSIONS: Choledocholithiasis occurs in 3.4% of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy but more than one third of these pass the calculi spontaneously within 6 weeks of operation and may be spared endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Treatment decisions based on assessment by operative cholangiography alone would result in unnecessary interventions in 50% of patients who had either false positive studies or subsequently passed the calculi. These data support a short-term expectant approach in the management of clinically silent choledocholithiasis in patients selected for LC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14685097      PMCID: PMC1356189          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103069.00170.9c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  30 in total

1.  Selective use of perioperative ERCP in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Daradkeh; M Shennak; M Abu-Khalaf
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

2.  Cost-effectiveness of operative cholangiography.

Authors:  J C Skillings; J S Williams; J R Hinshaw
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.

Authors:  Andrew C F Taylor; Andrew F Little; Oliver F Hennessy; Simon W Banting; Peter J Smith; Paul V Desmond
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Acute cholecystitis. Evaluation of factors influencing common duct exploration.

Authors:  J K Jacobs; R D Cebul; T E Adamson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography: adverse outcome or preventable error?

Authors:  D R Flum; T Koepsell; P Heagerty; M Sinanan; E P Dellinger
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-11

6.  Routine intravenous cholangiography, selective ERCP, and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L Sarli; N Pietra; A Franzé; G Colla; R Costi; S Gobbi; M Trivelli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Routine vs "on demand" postoperative ERCP for small bile duct calculi detected at intraoperative cholangiography. Clinical evaluation and cost analysis.

Authors:  B J Ammori; K Birbas; D Davides; A Vezakis; M Larvin; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Preoperative ERCP approach to common bile duct stones: results of a selective policy.

Authors:  H Rijna; W G Kemps; Q Eijsbouts; S G Meuwissen; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.588

9.  Ultrasound detection of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with ERCP in the postcholecystectomy patient.

Authors:  H J O'Connor; I Hamilton; W R Ellis; J Watters; D J Lintott; A T Axon
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1986

10.  Ultrasonic evaluation of common bile duct stones: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  B H Gross; L P Harter; R M Gore; P W Callen; R A Filly; H A Shapiro; H I Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  123 in total

Review 1.  Management of suspected stones in the common bile duct.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Jeffrey S Barkun; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Nicholas Alexakis; Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration using V-Loc suture with insertion of endobiliary stent.

Authors:  Jun Suh Lee; Young Chul Yoon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Authors:  D-F Hong; Y Xin; D-W Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Thirteen years' experience with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for stones. Effectiveness and long-term results.

Authors:  A M Paganini; M Guerrieri; J Sarnari; A De Sanctis; G D'Ambrosio; G Lezoche; S Perretta; E Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Dynamic analysis of commonly used biochemical parameters to predict common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Stéphane Bourgouin; Xavier Truchet; Gatien Lamblin; Jérôme De Roulhac; Jean-Philippe Platel; Paul Balandraud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Intraoperative cholangiography: past, present, and future.

Authors:  B V MacFadyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Role of routine intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ashwani Kumar; Upasna Kumar; Anand Munghate; Ashvind Bawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Clinical spotlight review for the management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Vimal K Narula; Eleanor C Fung; D Wayne Overby; William Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.