Literature DB >> 20354699

Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct with a rigid scope in patients with problematic choledocholithiasis.

Ahmet Tekin1, Zekai Ogetman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a minimally invasive approach to eliminate gallstones, in conjunction with increasingly sophisticated techniques for removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones by endoscopic sphincterotomy, has revolutionized the treatment of choledocholithiasis. We describe a new technical approach to laparoscopic exploration of the CBD after unsuccessful endoscopic stone extraction.
METHODS: Eleven patients were subjected to laparoscopic exploration of the CBD with choledochotomy using a rigid scope (24-Fr nephroscope) during the last 2 years. Of these patients, 10 had unsuccessful preoperative (7 cases) or intraoperative (3 cases) stone extraction, and 1 case had a single impacted stone 2.3 cm in diameter. Five patients had a single bile duct stone and 6 patients had multiple stones. The size of the stones ranged from 9.5 to 24 mm (mean = 12.6 +/- 4 mm).
RESULTS: Balloon dilation of the papilla of Vater was done in all patients. Most of the stones were fractured and pushed into the duodenum with rigid grasping forceps but a lithotripter was required in 2 patients. Stone clearance was 100%; complications related to the procedure were not observed. After CBD clearance, primary closure of the choledochotomy was achieved in 10 patients. In 1 patient who had CBD perforation during a previous procedure, choledochotomy was closed over a T-tube. The mean operative time was 124 +/- 26.7 min (range = 84-165 min) and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 4 +/- 1.7 days (range = 3-7 days).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic exploration of the CBD with a rigid scope is an efficacious procedure in dealing with unsuccessful endoscopic stone extraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20354699     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0534-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  18 in total

1.  Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience.

Authors:  L Enochsson; B Lindberg; F Swahn; U Arnelo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ.

Authors:  E S J Clayton; S Connor; N Alexakis; E Leandros
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after failed endoscopic stone extraction.

Authors:  Constantine Karaliotas; George Sgourakis; Constantine Goumas; Nickolaos Papaioannou; Constantine Lilis; Emmanouel Leandros
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Zhang; Gui-Fang Xu; Guo-Zhong Wu; Jie-Ming Li; Zhi-Tao Dong; Xiao-Dong Mo
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Reoperation of biliary tract by laparoscopy: experiences with 39 cases.

Authors:  Li-Bo Li; Xiu-Jun Cai; Yi-Ping Mou; Qi Wei
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Endoscopic balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for the removal of bile duct stones: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  P Vlavianos; K Chopra; S Mandalia; M Anderson; J Thompson; D Westaby
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Laparoendoscopic "rendezvous" versus laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Ahmet Tekin; Zekai Ogetman; Ekrem Altunel
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 8.  Choledocholithiasis, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Matthew Kroh; Bipan Chand
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Why is there recurrence after transcystic laparoscopic bile duct clearance? Risk factor analysis.

Authors:  A Bove; G Bongarzoni; G Palone; R M Di Renzo; E M Calisesi; L Corradetti; M Di Nicola; L Corbellini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  J A Williams; P J Treacy; P Sidey; C S Worthley; N C Townsend; E A Russell
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1994-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Surgical (Open and laparoscopic) management of large difficult CBD stones after different sessions of endoscopic failure: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emad Hamdy Gad; Hazem Zakaria; Yasmin Kamel; Ayman Alsebaey; Talat Zakareya; Mohamed Abbasy; Anwar Mohamed; Ali Nada; Mohammed Alsayed Abdelsamee; Mohamed Housseni
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-05-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.