Literature DB >> 30298446

Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: surgical indications and procedure strategies.

L Fang1, J Wang2, W C Dai3, B Liang4, H M Chen4, X W Fu4, B B Zheng4, J Lei4, C W Huang5, S B Zou4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: LTCBDE combined with or without modified techniques is safe and efficacious for the management of gallstones and concomitant, even large, common bile duct (CBD) stones.
METHODS: To describe the surgical indications and procedure strategies of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE), a retrospective analysis of 205 patients with concomitant gallstones and CBD stones treated using LTCBDE between June 2008 and June 2015 was performed. Clinical data on disease characteristics, methods for cystic duct incision and CBD stone extraction (with or without laser lithotripsy), and surgical outcomes were collected and reviewed.
RESULTS: CBD stones were successfully cleared in all patients. No patient was converted to choledochotomy or laparotomy. The cystic duct diameter ranged 3-8 mm, and 85 patients with cystic duct diameter ≥ 5 mm. The mean time for CBD stone extraction was 25.3 min, with the operative time ranged from 63 to 170 min. Lithotripsy was used in 74 (36.1%) patients among which 26 patients with cystic duct diameter ≥ 5 mm. Estimated blood loss during surgery was 10-120 ml per patient, and no intra-operative blood transfusions were needed. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.1 (range 3-7) days, and postoperative complications developed in seven patients. No bile duct injury, stricture, remnant, recurrent stones, or other adverse events were observed during the mean follow-up of 8 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on preoperative MRCP and intra-operative IOC findings about cystic duct diameter, the diameter of CBD, CBD stone size, we summarized and proposed the surgical indications and suitable techniques and strategies during LTCBDE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystic duct incision; Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration; Laser lithotripsy; Surgical strategy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30298446     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6195-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

1.  In vitro analysis of stone fragmentation ability of the FREDDY laser.

Authors:  Fernando C Delvecchio; Brian K Auge; Ricardo M Brizuela; Alon Z Weizer; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Thirteen years' experience with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for stones. Effectiveness and long-term results.

Authors:  A M Paganini; M Guerrieri; J Sarnari; A De Sanctis; G D'Ambrosio; G Lezoche; S Perretta; E Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  S Lyass; E H Phillips
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Stone clearance and risk factors for failure in laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  Cecilia Strömberg; Magnus Nilsson; Carl-Eric Leijonmarck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Efficacy and safety of endoscopic biliary lithotripsy using FREDDY laser with a radiopaque mark under fluoroscopic guidance.

Authors:  F Liu; Z D Jin; D W Zou; Z S Li
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Learning curve and outcome of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  J G Zhu; W Han; W Guo; W Su; Z G Bai; Z T Zhang
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Role of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Nikhil Gupta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-05-27

8.  All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  M H Thompson; S E Tranter
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Why is there recurrence after transcystic laparoscopic bile duct clearance? Risk factor analysis.

Authors:  A Bove; G Bongarzoni; G Palone; R M Di Renzo; E M Calisesi; L Corradetti; M Di Nicola; L Corbellini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic CBD exploration using a V-shaped choledochotomy.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Soo Ho Lee; Jun Suh Lee; Tae Ho Hong
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  4 in total

1.  Surgical methods of treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis: six years' experience of a single institution.

Authors:  Tong Guo; Lu Wang; Peng Xie; Zhiwei Zhang; Xiaorui Huang; Yahong Yu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Electrohydraulic lithotripsy and rendezvous nasal endoscopic cholangiography for common bile duct stone: A case report.

Authors:  Koichi Kimura; Kensuke Kudo; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Takeshi Kurihara; Shohei Yoshiya; Yohei Mano; Kazuki Takeishi; Shinji Itoh; Noboru Harada; Toru Ikegami; Tetsuo Ikeda
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Analysis of Laparoscopic Ultrathin Choledochoscope Curative Effect on Common Bile Duct Exploration and Choledocholithotomy in 47 Cases.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Tao Yang; Jia-Hong Liu; Xuan Meng; Hong-Tian Xia
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-31

4.  Management of Common Bile Duct Stones Encountered During Cholecystectomy in Patients With Previous Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Agnieszka Popowicz; Susanne Sanamrad; Bahman Darkahi; Rebecka Zacharias; Gabriel Sandblom
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.