Literature DB >> 28679844

Envelope contributions to the representation of interaural time difference in the forebrain of barn owls.

Philipp Tellers1, Jessica Lehmann2, Hartmut Führ2, Hermann Wagner3.   

Abstract

Birds and mammals use the interaural time difference (ITD) for azimuthal sound localization. While barn owls can use the ITD of the stimulus carrier frequency over nearly their entire hearing range, mammals have to utilize the ITD of the stimulus envelope to extend the upper frequency limit of ITD-based sound localization. ITD is computed and processed in a dedicated neural circuit that consists of two pathways. In the barn owl, ITD representation is more complex in the forebrain than in the midbrain pathway because of the combination of two inputs that represent different ITDs. We speculated that one of the two inputs includes an envelope contribution. To estimate the envelope contribution, we recorded ITD response functions for correlated and anticorrelated noise stimuli in the barn owl's auditory arcopallium. Our findings indicate that barn owls, like mammals, represent both carrier and envelope ITDs of overlapping frequency ranges, supporting the hypothesis that carrier and envelope ITD-based localization are complementary beyond a mere extension of the upper frequency limit.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The results presented in this study show for the first time that the barn owl is able to extract and represent the interaural time difference (ITD) information conveyed by the envelope of a broadband acoustic signal. Like mammals, the barn owl extracts the ITD of the envelope and the carrier of a signal from the same frequency range. These results are of general interest, since they reinforce a trend found in neural signal processing across different species.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory arcopallium; carrier; envelope; extracellular recordings; sound localization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28679844      PMCID: PMC5599666          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01166.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  62 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Stimulus-specific adaptations in the gaze control system of the barn owl.

Authors:  Amit Reches; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Tuning to interaural time difference and frequency differs between the auditory arcopallium and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Katrin Vonderschen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Disruption of auditory spatial working memory by inactivation of the forebrain archistriatum in barn owls.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; P F Knudsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Detecting interaural time differences and remodeling their representation.

Authors:  Katrin Vonderschen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Binaural tuning of auditory units in the forebrain archistriatal gaze fields of the barn owl: local organization but no space map.

Authors:  Y E Cohen; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences.

Authors:  P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Parallel pathways mediating both sound localization and gaze control in the forebrain and midbrain of the barn owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; P F Knudsen; T Masino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Low-frequency envelope sensitivity produces asymmetric binaural tuning curves.

Authors:  John P Agapiou; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.