Literature DB >> 19259108

Proteomic and metabolic prediction of response to therapy in gastrointestinal cancers.

Ken Herrmann1, Axel Walch, Benjamin Balluff, Marc Tänzer, Heinz Höfler, Bernd J Krause, Markus Schwaiger, Helmut Friess, Roland M Schmid, Matthias P A Ebert.   

Abstract

Despite substantial improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of many gastrointestinal cancers, particularly colorectal cancer, numerous patients are only diagnosed in advanced stages of disease, which can preclude curative treatment. Screening and early diagnosis of high-risk individuals might be the most promising approach to improve prognosis; however, molecular biomarkers for early diagnosis of most gastrointestinal cancers are not yet available. The prognosis of patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers has improved through the development of multimodal treatments and the introduction of targeted therapies. Nonetheless, not all patients benefit equally from these treatment approaches, and toxicity can be substantial. The ability to predict whether a patient will respond to therapy early in their treatment for gastrointestinal cancer may be of particular value to stratify and individualize patient treatment strategies. Despite improvement in the understanding of cancer pathogenesis and progression at the molecular level, the molecular changes that underlie treatment response and/or drug resistance are still largely unknown. PET is the first technique to show promise in prediction of response to therapy, and has resulted in promising advancements, particularly in esophageal and gastric cancers. Tissue-based and blood-based molecular biomarkers are still subject to validation. Prediction of response to treatment could ultimately lead to an overall improvement in prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19259108     DOI: 10.1038/ncpgasthep1366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1743-4378


  110 in total

Review 1.  Proteomics and disease--the challenges for technology and discovery.

Authors:  György Marko-Varga; Thomas E Fehniger
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Overexpression of cathepsin B in gastric cancer identified by proteome analysis.

Authors:  Matthias P A Ebert; Sabine Krüger; Marie-Laure Fogeron; Stephanie Lamer; Jie Chen; Matthias Pross; Hans-Ulrich Schulz; Hermann Lage; Steffen Heim; Albert Roessner; Peter Malfertheiner; Christoph Röcken
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 3.  Monitoring cancer treatment with PET/CT: does it make a difference?

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber; Robert Figlin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Preliminary study on proteomics of gastric carcinoma and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Hong-Gang Qian; Jing Shen; Hong Ma; Hua-Chong Ma; Ya-Hui Su; Chun-Yi Hao; Bao-Cai Xing; Xin-Fu Huang; Cheng-Chao Shou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  A serum proteomic pattern for the detection of colorectal adenocarcinoma using surface enhanced laser desorption and ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Xing-Pan Liu; Jing Shen; Zhen-Fu Li; Li Yan; Jin Gu
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 6.  CpG island methylator phenotype in cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Issa
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Chemotherapy response evaluation with FDG-PET in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L F de Geus-Oei; H W M van Laarhoven; E P Visser; R Hermsen; B A van Hoorn; Y J L Kamm; P F M Krabbe; F H M Corstens; C J A Punt; W J G Oyen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Extracellular matrix signature identifies breast cancer subgroups with different clinical outcome.

Authors:  A Bergamaschi; E Tagliabue; T Sørlie; B Naume; T Triulzi; R Orlandi; H G Russnes; J M Nesland; R Tammi; P Auvinen; V-M Kosma; S Ménard; A-L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  Sequential FDG-PET/CT reliably predicts response of locally advanced rectal cancer to neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy.

Authors:  Carlo Capirci; Lucia Rampin; Paola A Erba; Fabrizio Galeotti; Giorgio Crepaldi; Elena Banti; Marcello Gava; Stefano Fanti; Giuliano Mariani; Pier Carlo Muzzio; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Diagnostic application of serum proteomic patterns in gastric cancer patients by ProteinChip surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J Y Lim; J Y Cho; Y H Paik; Y S Chang; H G Kim
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.248

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: response assessment before surgery and how to predict response to chemoradiation before starting treatment.

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler; Arnulf H Hölscher; Matthias Schmidt; Ute Warnecke-Eberz
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  Proteomic and metabolic prediction of response to therapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Michaela Aichler; Birgit Luber; Florian Lordick; Axel Walch
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Heat shock protein: hard worker or bad offender for gastric diseases.

Authors:  Ho-Jae Lee; Chan Young Ock; Seong-Jin Kim; Ki-Baik Hahm
Journal:  Int J Proteomics       Date:  2010-09-29

4.  The proteomics of colorectal cancer: identification of a protein signature associated with prognosis.

Authors:  Donna O'Dwyer; Lynda D Ralton; Aisling O'Shea; Graeme I Murray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mining novel biomarkers for prognosis of gastric cancer with serum proteomics.

Authors:  Fu-Ming Qiu; Jie-Kai Yu; Yi-Ding Chen; Qi-Feng Jin; Mei-Hua Sui; Jian Huang
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-09

Review 6.  Relevance of Circulating Tumor Cells as Predictive Markers for Cancer Incidence and Relapse.

Authors:  Chaithanya Chelakkot; Hobin Yang; Young Kee Shin
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.