Literature DB >> 26157318

Neoadjuvant treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: response assessment before surgery and how to predict response to chemoradiation before starting treatment.

Elfriede Bollschweiler1, Arnulf H Hölscher1, Matthias Schmidt1, Ute Warnecke-Eberz1.   

Abstract

Patients with advanced esophageal cancer (T3-4, N) have a poor prognosis. Chemoradiation or chemotherapy before esophagectomy with adequate lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for patients with resectable advanced esophageal carcinoma. However, only patients with major histopathologic response (regression to less than 10% of the primary tumor) after preoperative treatment will have a prognostic benefit of preoperative chemoradiation. Using current therapy regimens about 40% to 50% of the patients show major histopathological response. The remaining cohort does not benefit from this neoadjuvant approach but might benefit from earlier surgical resection. Therefore, it is an aim to develop tools for response prediction before starting the treatment and for early response assessment identifying responders. The current review discusses the different imaging techniques and the most recent studies about molecular markers for early response prediction. The results show that [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has a good sensitivity but the specificity is not robust enough for routine clinical use. Newer positron emission tomography detector technology, the combination of FDG-PET with computed tomography, additional evaluation criteria and standardization of evaluation may improve the predictive value. There exist a great number of retrospective studies using molecular markers for prediction of response. Until now the clinical use is missing. But the results of first prospective studies are promising. A future perspective may be the combination of imaging technics and special molecular markers for individualized therapy. Another aspect is the response assessment after finishing neoadjuvant treatment protocol. The different clinical methods are discussed. The results show that until now no non-invasive method is valid enough to assess complete histopathological response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; adenocarcinoma; neoadjuvant chemoradiation; response assessment; response prediction; squamous cell carcinoma

Year:  2015        PMID: 26157318      PMCID: PMC4490195          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.04.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res        ISSN: 1000-9604            Impact factor:   5.087


  74 in total

Review 1.  Esophageal cancer: CT, endoscopic US, and FDG PET for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy--systematic review.

Authors:  Marinke Westerterp; Henderik L van Westreenen; Johannes B Reitsma; Otto S Hoekstra; Jaap Stoker; Paul Fockens; Pieter L Jager; Berthe L F Van Eck-Smit; John T M Plukker; J Jan B van Lanschot; Gerrit W Sloof
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  The importance of PET in the diagnosis and response evaluation of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  K Ott; W Weber; J-R Siewert
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for evaluating early response during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mark van Heijl; Jikke M Omloo; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Otto S Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard; Patrick M Bossuyt; Olivier R Busch; Hugo W Tilanus; Maarten C Hulshof; Ate van der Gaast; Grard A Nieuwenhuijzen; Han J Bonenkamp; John Th Plukker; Miguel A Cuesta; Fiebo J Ten Kate; Jan Pruim; Herman van Dekken; Jacques J Bergman; Gerrit W Sloof; J Jan van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response classification.

Authors:  Paul M Schneider; Stephan E Baldus; Ralf Metzger; Martin Kocher; Rudolf Bongartz; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Hartmut Schaefer; Juergen Thiele; Hans P Dienes; Rolf P Mueller; Arnulf H Hoelscher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Biomarkers of response to therapy in oesophago-gastric cancer.

Authors:  K R Fareed; P Kaye; I N Soomro; M Ilyas; S Martin; S L Parsons; S Madhusudan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Response evaluation by endoscopy, rebiopsy, and endoscopic ultrasound does not accurately predict histopathologic regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Paul M Schneider; Ralf Metzger; Hartmut Schaefer; Frank Baumgarten; Daniel Vallbohmer; Jan Brabender; Eva Wolfgarten; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Stephan E Baldus; Hans P Dienes; Arnulf H Hoelscher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  18F-fluorodeoxiglucose positron emission tomography for the evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy response in esophageal cancer: systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Angel C Rebollo Aguirre; Carlos Ramos-Font; Román Villegas Portero; Gary J R Cook; José M Llamas Elvira; Antonio Romero Tabares
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Histological type of esophageal cancer might affect response to neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy and subsequent prognosis.

Authors:  E Bollschweiler; R Metzger; U Drebber; S Baldus; D Vallböhmer; M Kocher; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in cT3 oesophageal cancer - A propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Arnulf H Hölscher; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Dean Bogoevski; Henner Schmidt; Robert Semrau; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 10.  Proteomic and metabolic prediction of response to therapy in gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Ken Herrmann; Axel Walch; Benjamin Balluff; Marc Tänzer; Heinz Höfler; Bernd J Krause; Markus Schwaiger; Helmut Friess; Roland M Schmid; Matthias P A Ebert
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  The Presence of Serum p53 Antibody Predicts the Pathological Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin and Fluorouracil (DCF) in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yukiharu Hiyoshi; Naoya Yoshida; Masayuki Watanabe; Junji Kurashige; Yoshifumi Baba; Yasuo Sakamoto; Hideo Baba
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for advanced esophageal cancer response assessment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Na-Na Sun; Chang Liu; Xiao-Lin Ge; Jie Wang
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Histogram analysis of DCE-MRI for chemoradiotherapy response evaluation in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Na-Na Sun; Xiao-Lin Ge; Xi-Sheng Liu; Lu-Lu Xu
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  A novel intraperitoneal metastatic xenograft mouse model for survival outcome assessment of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Md Sazzad Hassan; Niranjan Awasthi; Jun Li; Margaret A Schwarz; Roderich E Schwarz; Urs von Holzen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  PATHOLOGIC COMPLETE RESPONSE (YPT0 YPN0) AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIOTHERAPY NEOADJUVANT FOLLOWED BY ESOPHAGECTOMY IN THE SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS.

Authors:  Nelson Adami Andreollo; Giovanni de Carvalho Beraldo; Iuri Pedreira Filardi Alves; Valdir Tercioti-Junior; José Antonio Possato Ferrer; João de Souza Coelho-Neto; Luiz Roberto Lopes
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2018-12-06

6.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy for cancer: An initial experience.

Authors:  Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Sumanta Dey; Sandeep Sabnis; Raghavendra Gupta; Bharath Cumar; Saravana Kumar; Ramesh Natarajan; Parthasarathi Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Clonal Expansion of Tumor-Infiltrating T Cells and Analysis of the Tumor Microenvironment within Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Relapsed after Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy.

Authors:  Takahiro Mori; Kenichi Kumagai; Keisuke Nasu; Takamasa Yoshizawa; Koji Kuwano; Yoshiki Hamada; Hideki Kanazawa; Ryuji Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Prognostic Assessment of Interim F18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Esophageal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation With or Without Surgery.

Authors:  Sophie Lavertu; Maroie Barkati; Sylvain Beaulieu; Jocelyne Martin; Marie-Pierre Campeau; David Donath; David Roberge
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-12

9.  Superior Therapeutic Efficacy of Nanoparticle Albumin Bound Paclitaxel Over Cremophor-Bound Paclitaxel in Experimental Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Md Sazzad Hassan; Niranjan Awasthi; Jun Li; Fiona Williams; Margaret A Schwarz; Roderich E Schwarz; Urs von Holzen
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Addition of HER2 and CD44 to 18F-FDG PET-based clinico-radiomic models enhances prediction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Roelof J Beukinga; Da Wang; Arend Karrenbeld; Willemieke P M Dijksterhuis; Hette Faber; Johannes G M Burgerhof; Véronique E M Mul; Riemer H J A Slart; Robert P Coppes; John Th M Plukker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.