Literature DB >> 18044827

Extracellular matrix signature identifies breast cancer subgroups with different clinical outcome.

A Bergamaschi1, E Tagliabue, T Sørlie, B Naume, T Triulzi, R Orlandi, H G Russnes, J M Nesland, R Tammi, P Auvinen, V-M Kosma, S Ménard, A-L Børresen-Dale.   

Abstract

Prediction of the clinical outcome of breast cancer is multi-faceted and challenging. There is growing evidence that the complexity of the tumour micro-environment, consisting of several cell types and a complex mixture of proteins, plays an important role in development, progression, and response to therapy. In the current study, we investigated whether invasive breast tumours can be classified on the basis of the expression of extracellular matrix (ECM) components and whether such classification is representative of different clinical outcomes. We first examined the matrix composition of 28 primary breast carcinomas by morphology and gene expression profiling using 22K oligonucleotide Agilent microarrays. Hierarchical clustering of the gene expression profile of 278 ECM-related genes derived from the literature divided the tumours into four main groups (ECM1-4). A set of selected differentially expressed genes was validated by immunohistochemistry. The robustness of the ECM classification was confirmed by studying the four ECM groups in a previously published gene expression data set of 114 early-stage primary breast carcinomas profiled using cDNA arrays. Univariate survival analysis showed significant differences in clinical outcome among the various ECM subclasses. One set of tumours, designated ECM4, had a favourable outcome and was defined by the overexpression of a set of protease inhibitors belonging to the serpin family, while tumours with an ECM1 signature had a poorer prognosis and showed high expression of integrins and metallopeptidases, and low expression of several laminin chains. Furthermore, we identified three surrogate markers of ECM1 tumours: MARCO, PUNC, and SPARC, whose expression levels were associated with breast cancer survival and risk of recurrence. Our findings suggest that primary breast tumours can be classified based upon ECM composition and that this classification provides relevant information on the biology of breast carcinomas, further supporting the hypothesis that clinical outcome is strongly related to stromal characteristics. Copyright (c) 2007 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18044827     DOI: 10.1002/path.2278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  149 in total

1.  Endogenous versus tumor-specific host response to breast carcinoma: a study of stromal response in synchronous breast primaries and biopsy site changes.

Authors:  Julie M Wu; Andrew H Beck; Lisa L Pate; Daniela Witten; Shirley X Zhu; Kelli D Montgomery; Kimberly H Allison; Matt van de Rijn; Robert B West
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  The tumor microenvironment modulates tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer: a role for soluble stromal factors and fibronectin through β1 integrin.

Authors:  Osvaldo Pontiggia; Rocio Sampayo; Diego Raffo; Andrea Motter; Ren Xu; Mina J Bissell; Elisa Bal de Kier Joffé; Marina Simian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Biophysical control of invasive tumor cell behavior by extracellular matrix microarchitecture.

Authors:  Shawn P Carey; Casey M Kraning-Rush; Rebecca M Williams; Cynthia A Reinhart-King
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Cell-matrix interactions in mammary gland development and breast cancer.

Authors:  John Muschler; Charles H Streuli
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Inactivation of Rb in stromal fibroblasts promotes epithelial cell invasion.

Authors:  Adam Pickard; Ann-Christin Cichon; Anna Barry; Declan Kieran; Daksha Patel; Peter Hamilton; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Jacqueline James; Dennis J McCance
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Non-small cell lung cancer: identifying prognostic imaging biomarkers by leveraging public gene expression microarray data--methods and preliminary results.

Authors:  Olivier Gevaert; Jiajing Xu; Chuong D Hoang; Ann N Leung; Yue Xu; Andrew Quon; Daniel L Rubin; Sandy Napel; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Daniela F Quail; Johanna A Joyce
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  The process of macrophage migration promotes matrix metalloproteinase-independent invasion by tumor cells.

Authors:  Romain Guiet; Emeline Van Goethem; Céline Cougoule; Stéphanie Balor; Annie Valette; Talal Al Saati; Clifford A Lowell; Véronique Le Cabec; Isabelle Maridonneau-Parini
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  SPARCL1: a potential molecule associated with tumor diagnosis, progression and prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Emma Widegren; Da-Wei Wang; Xiao-Feng Sun
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-09-02

Review 10.  Unraveling the microenvironmental influences on the normal mammary gland and breast cancer.

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Mina J Bissell
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 15.707

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.