Literature DB >> 25320503

Proteomic and metabolic prediction of response to therapy in gastric cancer.

Michaela Aichler1, Birgit Luber1, Florian Lordick1, Axel Walch1.   

Abstract

Several new treatment options for gastric cancer have been introduced but the prognosis of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer is still poor. Disease prognosis could be improved for high-risk individuals by implementing earlier screenings. Because many patients are asymptomatic during the early stages of gastric cancer, the diagnosis is often delayed and patients present with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease. Cytotoxic treatment has been shown to prolong survival in general, but not all patients are responders. The application of targeted therapies and multimodal treatment has improved prognosis for those with advanced disease. However, these new therapeutic strategies do not uniformly benefit all patients. Predicting whether patients will respond to specific therapies would be of particular value and would allow for stratifying patients for personalized treatment strategies. Metabolic imaging by positron emission tomography was the first technique with the potential to predict the response of esophago-gastric cancer to neoadjuvant therapy. Exploring and validating tissue-based biomarkers are ongoing processes. In this review, we discuss the status of several targeted therapies for gastric cancer, as well as proteomic and metabolic methods for investigating biomarkers for therapy response prediction in gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization; Positron emission tomography; Response prediction; Therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25320503      PMCID: PMC4194549          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  79 in total

1.  On respiratory impairment in cancer cells.

Authors:  O WARBURG
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Monitoring cancer treatment with PET/CT: does it make a difference?

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber; Robert Figlin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Preliminary study on proteomics of gastric carcinoma and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Hong-Gang Qian; Jing Shen; Hong Ma; Hua-Chong Ma; Ya-Hui Su; Chun-Yi Hao; Bao-Cai Xing; Xin-Fu Huang; Cheng-Chao Shou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Proteomics-based identification of DEAD-box protein 48 as a novel autoantigen, a prospective serum marker for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Qing Xia; Xian-Tao Kong; Guo-An Zhang; Xiao-Jin Hou; Hua Qiang; Ren-Qian Zhong
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Lapatinib in Combination With Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Advanced or Metastatic Gastric, Esophageal, or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: TRIO-013/LOGiC--A Randomized Phase III Trial.

Authors:  J Randolph Hecht; Yung-Jue Bang; Shukui K Qin; Hyun C Chung; Jianming M Xu; Joon O Park; Krzysztof Jeziorski; Yaroslav Shparyk; Paulo M Hoff; Alberto Sobrero; Pamela Salman; Jin Li; Svetlana A Protsenko; Zev A Wainberg; Marc Buyse; Karen Afenjar; Vincent Houé; Agathe Garcia; Tomomi Kaneko; Yingjie Huang; Saba Khan-Wasti; Sergio Santillana; Michael F Press; Dennis Slamon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  HER2 in gastric cancer: a new prognostic factor and a novel therapeutic target.

Authors:  C Gravalos; A Jimeno
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  Analysis of tissue specimens by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry in biological and clinical research.

Authors:  Jeremy L Norris; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 8.  Proteomic and metabolic prediction of response to therapy in gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Ken Herrmann; Axel Walch; Benjamin Balluff; Marc Tänzer; Heinz Höfler; Bernd J Krause; Markus Schwaiger; Helmut Friess; Roland M Schmid; Matthias P A Ebert
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-03

Review 9.  Applications of mass spectrometry for quantitative protein analysis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  Carine Steiner; Axel Ducret; Jean-Christophe Tille; Marlene Thomas; Thomas A McKee; Laura Rubbia-Brandt; Alexander Scherl; Pierre Lescuyer; Paul Cutler
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  Diagnostic application of serum proteomic patterns in gastric cancer patients by ProteinChip surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J Y Lim; J Y Cho; Y H Paik; Y S Chang; H G Kim
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.248

View more
  8 in total

1.  LncRNA NEAT1 Promotes the Progression of Gastric Cancer Through Modifying the miR-1224-5p/RSF1 Signaling Axis.

Authors:  Luoluo Yang; Min Wang; Ping He
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 2.  Towards curative therapy in gastric cancer: Faraway, so close!

Authors:  Marília Cravo; Catarina Fidalgo; Rita Garrido; Tânia Rodrigues; Gonçalo Luz; Carolina Palmela; Marta Santos; Fábio Lopes; Rui Maio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Radiomic analysis using contrast-enhanced CT: predict treatment response to pulsed low dose rate radiotherapy in gastric carcinoma with abdominal cavity metastasis.

Authors:  Zhen Hou; Yang Yang; Shuangshuang Li; Jing Yan; Wei Ren; Juan Liu; Kangxin Wang; Baorui Liu; Suiren Wan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-05

Review 4.  Molecular Characterization of Gastric Carcinoma: Therapeutic Implications for Biomarkers and Targets.

Authors:  Lionel Kankeu Fonkoua; Nelson S Yee
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2018-03-09

Review 5.  Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionisation Mass Spectrometry Imaging in the Study of Gastric Cancer: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Andrew Smith; Isabella Piga; Manuel Galli; Martina Stella; Vanna Denti; Marina Del Puppo; Fulvio Magni
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Light sheet fluorescence microscopy guided MALDI-imaging mass spectrometry of cleared tissue samples.

Authors:  Andreas Blutke; Na Sun; Zhihao Xu; Achim Buck; Luke Harrison; Sonja C Schriever; Paul T Pfluger; David Wiles; Thomas Kunzke; Katharina Huber; Jürgen Schlegel; Michaela Aichler; Annette Feuchtinger; Kaspar Matiasek; Stefanie M Hauck; Axel Walch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Interpretation of the development of neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer based on the vicissitudes of the NCCN guidelines.

Authors:  Xian-Ze Wang; Zi-Yang Zeng; Xin Ye; Juan Sun; Zi-Mu Zhang; Wei-Ming Kang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-01-15

Review 8.  Exosomal non‑coding RNAs: Novel biomarkers with emerging clinical applications in gastric cancer (Review).

Authors:  Xu Lu; Yu Zhang; Guangfei Xie; Ye Ding; Hui Cong; Shihai Xuan
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.952

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.