Literature DB >> 16419150

Preliminary study on proteomics of gastric carcinoma and its clinical significance.

Hong-Gang Qian1, Jing Shen, Hong Ma, Hua-Chong Ma, Ya-Hui Su, Chun-Yi Hao, Bao-Cai Xing, Xin-Fu Huang, Cheng-Chao Shou.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore the preliminary identification of serum protein pattern models that may be novel potential biomarkers in the detection of gastric cancer.
METHODS: A total of 130 serum samples, including 70 from patients with gastric cancer and 60 from healthy adults, were detected by surface-enhanced laser desorption and ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS). The data of spectra were analyzed by Biomarker Patterns Software (BPS). Thirty serum samples of gastric cancer patients and 30 serum samples of healthy adults were grouped into the training group to build models, and the other 70 samples were used to test and evaluate the models. The samples of the test group were judged only with their peaks' height and were separated into cancer group or healthy control group by BPS automatically and the judgments were checked with the histopathologic diagnosis of the samples.
RESULTS: Sixteen mass peaks were found to be potential biomarkers with a significant level of P< 0.01. Among them, nine mass peaks showed increased expression in patients with gastric cancer. Analyzed by BPS, two peaks were chosen to build the model for gastric cancer detection. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the model were 90%, 36/40, 86.7%, 26/30, and 88.6%, 62/70, respectively, which were greatly higher than those of clinically used serum biomarkers CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen), CA19-9 and CA72-4. Stage I/II gastric cancer samples of the test group were all judged correctly.
CONCLUSION: The novel biomarkers in serum and the established model could be potentially used in the detection of gastric cancer. However, large-scale studies should be carried on to further explore the clinical impact on the model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16419150      PMCID: PMC4320325          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i40.6249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  32 in total

Review 1.  Proteomics: a new approach to the study of disease.

Authors:  G Chambers; L Lawrie; P Cash; G I Murray
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.996

2.  The SELDI-TOF MS approach to proteomics: protein profiling and biomarker identification.

Authors:  Haleem J Issaq; Timothy D Veenstra; Thomas P Conrads; Donna Felschow
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Urine protein profiling with surface-enhanced laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Stefan Schaub; John Wilkins; Tracey Weiler; Kevin Sangster; David Rush; Peter Nickerson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Methods for on-chip protein analysis.

Authors:  Emilia Caputo; Ramy Moharram; Brian M Martin
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  M J Gaspar; I Arribas; M C Coca; M Díez-Alonso
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

6.  Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study.

Authors:  C J Murray; A D Lopez
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Use of proteomic analysis to monitor responses to biological therapies.

Authors:  Virginia Espina; Kristine A Dettloff; Stacy Cowherd; Emanuel F Petricoin; Lance A Liotta
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.388

8.  Proteomics and bioinformatics approaches for identification of serum biomarkers to detect breast cancer.

Authors:  Jinong Li; Zhen Zhang; Jason Rosenzweig; Young Y Wang; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  SELDI-TOF-based serum proteomic pattern diagnostics for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  Emanuel F Petricoin; Lance A Liotta
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.740

10.  Proteomic profiling of urinary proteins in renal cancer by surface enhanced laser desorption ionization and neural-network analysis: identification of key issues affecting potential clinical utility.

Authors:  Mark A Rogers; Paul Clarke; Jason Noble; Nicholas P Munro; Alan Paul; Peter J Selby; Rosamonde E Banks
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Human body fluid proteome analysis.

Authors:  Shen Hu; Joseph A Loo; David T Wong
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 2.  Proteomic and metabolic prediction of response to therapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Michaela Aichler; Birgit Luber; Florian Lordick; Axel Walch
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Proteomic and metabolic prediction of response to therapy in gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Ken Herrmann; Axel Walch; Benjamin Balluff; Marc Tänzer; Heinz Höfler; Bernd J Krause; Markus Schwaiger; Helmut Friess; Roland M Schmid; Matthias P A Ebert
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-03

Review 4.  Emerging blood-based biomarkers for detection of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zane Kalniņa; Irēna Meistere; Ilze Kikuste; Ivars Tolmanis; Pawel Zayakin; Aija Linē
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Sample preparation for serum/plasma profiling and biomarker identification by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jose L Luque-Garcia; Thomas A Neubert
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  The distinctive gastric fluid proteome in gastric cancer reveals a multi-biomarker diagnostic profile.

Authors:  Oi Lian Kon; Tai-Tung Yip; Meng Fatt Ho; Weng Hoong Chan; Wai Keong Wong; Soo Yong Tan; Wai Har Ng; Siok Yuen Kam; Alvin Kh Eng; Patrick Ho; Rosa Viner; Hock Soo Ong; M Priyanthi Kumarasinghe
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 7.  Applications of SELDI-MS technology in oncology.

Authors:  L C Whelan; K A R Power; D T McDowell; J Kennedy; W M Gallagher
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 5.310

8.  Diagnostic and prognostic role of serum protein peak at 6449 m/z in gastric adenocarcinoma based on mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Dongjian Song; Lifang Yue; Hao Li; Junjie Zhang; Zechen Yan; Yingzhong Fan; Heying Yang; Qiuliang Liu; Da Zhang; Ziqiang Xia; Pan Qin; Jia Jia; Ming Yue; Jiekai Yu; Shu Zheng; Fuquan Yang; Jiaxiang Wang
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.