Literature DB >> 19242764

Differences between sagittal femoral mechanical and distal reference axes should be considered in navigated TKA.

Byung June Chung1, Yeon Gwi Kang, Chong Bum Chang, Sung Ju Kim, Tae Kyun Kim.   

Abstract

In computer-assisted TKA, surgeons determine positioning of the femoral component in the sagittal plane based on the sagittal mechanical axis identified by the navigation system. We hypothesized mechanical and distal femoral axes may differ on lateral views and these variations are influenced by anteroposterior bowing and length of the femur. We measured angles between the mechanical axis and distal femoral axis on 200 true lateral radiographs of the whole femur from 100 adults. We used multivariate linear regression to identify predictors of differences between the axes. Depending on the method used to define the two axes, the mean angular difference between the axes was as much as 3.8 degrees and as little as 0.0 degrees, with standard differences ranging from 1.7 degrees to 1.9 degrees. Variation between the two axes increased with increased femoral bowing and increased femoral length. Surgeons should consider differences between the mechanical axes and distal femoral axes when they set the sagittal plane position of a femoral component in navigated cases. Our findings also may be relevant when measuring rotation of the femoral component in the sagittal plane from postoperative radiographs or when interpreting femoral component sagittal rotation results reported in other studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19242764      PMCID: PMC2866923          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0762-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  36 in total

1.  Tibial post wear in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. An unrecognized source of polyethylene debris.

Authors:  S K Puloski; R W McCalden; S J MacDonald; C H Rorabeck; R B Bourne
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Sagittal bowing of the distal femur in Chinese patients who require total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  W M Tang; K Y Chiu; M F Y Kwan; T P Ng; W P Yau
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine?

Authors:  Markus Tingart; Christian Lüring; Holger Bäthis; Johannes Beckmann; Joachim Grifka; Lars Perlick
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Prevalence of fat embolism after total knee arthroplasty performed with or without computer navigation.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jun-Shik Kim; Ki-Sook Hong; Youn-Jin Kim; Jong-Hak Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ralf E Rosenberger; Christian Hoser; Sebastian Quirbach; Rene Attal; Alfred Hennerbichler; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The consequences of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty. A biomechanical study.

Authors:  M L Lesh; D J Schneider; G Deol; B Davis; C R Jacobs; V D Pellegrini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs?

Authors:  K E Swanson; G W Stocks; P D Warren; M R Hazel; H F Janssen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Variances in sagittal femoral shaft bowing in patients undergoing TKA.

Authors:  Tameem M Yehyawi; John J Callaghan; Douglas R Pedersen; Michael R O'Rourke; Steve S Liu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Andrew Quoc Dutton; Seng-Jin Yeo; Kuang-Ying Yang; Ngai-Nung Lo; Kui-Un Chia; Hwei-Chi Chong
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Y-H Kim; J-S Kim; S-H Yoon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-04
View more
  25 in total

1.  Increased flexion position of the femoral component reduces the flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georg Matziolis; Robert Hube; Carsten Perka; Doerte Matziolis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Femur bowing could be a risk factor for implant flexion in conventional total knee arthroplasty and notching in navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jae Han Ko; Chang Dong Han; Kyoo Ho Shin; Levis Nguku; Ick Hwan Yang; Woo Suk Lee; Kwang Il Kim; Kwan Kyu Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Clinical Faceoff: Do We Need Special Strategies for Asian Patients with TKA?

Authors:  Young Hoo Kim; Shuichi Matsuda; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Femoral curvature variability in modern humans using three-dimensional quadric surface fitting.

Authors:  Tara Chapman; Victor Sholukha; Patrick Semal; Stéphane Louryan; Marcel Rooze; Serge Van Sint Jan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishida; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Seiji Kubo; Atsushi Kitagawa; Takaaki Chin; Tetsuhiro Iguchi; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Radiographic Evaluation of Alignment Following Total Knee Arthroplasty - a Systematic Review. Part II.

Authors:  Bogdan Stefan Cretu; Calin Dragosloveanu; Serban Dragosloveanu; Stefan Cristea
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2018-06

Review 7.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Mofidi; Johannes F Plate; Bo Lu; Michael A Conditt; Jason E Lang; Gary G Poehling; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Current concepts and future perspectives in computer-assisted navigated total knee replacement.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Naoki Nakano; John E Lawrence; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Verification of in vivo accuracy of Trumatch™ patient-specific instrumentation in total knee replacement using pin-less computer navigation.

Authors:  Nikolai Briffa; Mohamed A Imam; Ravi Mallina; Ashraf Abdelkafy; Ajeya Adhikari
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.